Compositions of orthogonal lysyl-tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase pairs and uses thereof

ABSTRACT

Compositions and methods of producing components of protein biosynthetic machinery that include orthogonal lysyl-tRNAs, orthogonal lysyl-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, and orthogonal pairs of lysyl-tRNAs/synthetases, which incorporate homoglutamines into proteins are provided in response to a four base codon. Methods for identifying these orthogonal pairs are also provided along with methods of producing proteins with homoglutamines using these orthogonal pairs.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to and benefit of Provisional PatentApplication U.S. Ser. No. 60/485,451, filed Jul. 7, 2003; ProvisionalPatent Application U.S. Ser. No. 60/528,815, filed Dec. 10, 2003; andProvisional Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 60/537,149, filed Jan. 15,2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference intheir entirety for all purposes.

STATEMENT AS TO RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER FEDERALLY SPONSOREDRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with government support under GrantDE-FG0300ER45812 from the Department of Energy. The government may havecertain rights to this invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention is in the field of translation biochemistry. The inventionrelates to methods for producing and compositions of orthogonal tRNAs,orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, and pairs thereof, thatincorporate unnatural amino acids, e.g., homoglutamines, into proteinsin response to selector codons such as four base and stop selectorcodons. This includes the incorporation of multiple different unnaturalamino acids into a single protein chain in response to stop and fourbase selector codons. The invention also relates to methods of producingproteins in cells using such pairs and related compositions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Although, with few exceptions, the genetic codes of all known organismsencode the same twenty amino acids, all that is required to add a newamino acid to the repertoire of an organism is a uniquetRNA/aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase pair, a source of the amino acid, and aunique selector codon that specifies the amino acid (Furter (1998)Protein Sci., 7:419-426). Previously, we have shown that the ambernonsense codon, TAG, together with orthogonal M. jannaschii and E. colitRNA/synthetase pairs can be used to genetically encode a variety avariety of amino acids with novel properties in E. coli (Wang et al.,(2000) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122:5010-5011; Wanget al., (2001) Science,292:498-500; Wang et al., (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,100:56-61; Chin et al., (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,99:11020-11024), and yeast (Chin and Schultz, (2002) ChemBioChem,3:1135-1137), respectively. The limited number of noncoding tripletcodons, however, severely restricts the ultimate number of amino acidsencoded by any organism.

There are many examples of naturally occurring +1 frameshift suppressorsincluding UAGN suppressors derived from Su7 encoding glutamine(Maglieryet al., (2001) J. Mol. Biol., 307:755-769), sufJ-derivedsuppressors of ACCN codons encoding threonine (Anderson et al., (2002)Chem. Biol., 9:237-244) and CAAA suppressors derived from tRNA^(Lys) andtRNA^(Gln) (Anderson and Schultz, (2003) Biochemistry, 42(32):9598-608).Moreover, genetic selections have been used to identify efficient four-and five-base codon suppressor tRNAs from large libraries of mutanttRNAs, including an E. coli tRNA_(UCCU) ^(Ser) suppressor (Ibba et al.,(1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96:418-423; Kwok and Wong, (1980)Can. J. Biochem., 58:213-218). This natural phenomena has been extendedfor unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in vitro using chemicallyaminoacylated tRNAs. A variety of amino acids, includingfluorophore/quencher pairs (Terada et al., (2002) Nat. Struct. Biol.,9:257-262), have been incorporated into protein in response to AGGU andCGGG (Hou et al., (1992) Biochemistry, 31:4157-4160; Yarus et al.,(1986) J. Mol. Biol., 192:235-255; Miller, (1972) Experiments inmolecular genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor,N.Y.). To further expand the genetic code, there is a need to developimproved and/or additional components of the biosynthetic machinery,e.g., orthogonal tRNAs, orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and/orunique codons. This invention fulfills these and other needs, as will beapparent upon review of the following disclosure.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides novel translation systems that produceprotein products using orthogonal tRNA and orthogonal aminoacyl tRNAsynthetases. The invention relates to the assembled translation system,the methods for using the translation system, and the translationproducts produced by the system. This technology finds a number of usesas discussed herein, for example, but not limited to, the production oftherapeutic products, diagnostic reagents and industrial enzymes.

In one aspect, the invention provides a translation system that uses anorthogonal lysyl tRNA (lysyl O-tRNA) or a modified variant of thatO-tRNA and/or an orthogonal aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (O-RS) thatpreferentially charges an orthogonal lysyl tRNA with one or more aminoacid or a modified variant of that O-RS. In some embodiments, thetranslation system is in a cell, for example, an E. coli cell. The aminoacid optionally coupled to the O-tRNA is an unnatural amino acid, forexample homoglutamine.

In some embodiments of the translation system, the lysyl O-tRNA, thevariant of the O-tRNA, the O-RS, or both the O-tRNA and the O-RS, arederived from Pyrococcus horikoshii (PhKRS). Various O-RSs that find usewith the translation system, include PhKRS, E444G, PhΔAD, and an I41and/or S268 mutant of PhΔAD. In some embodiments, the Pyrococcushorikoshii O-RS, when expressed in an E. coli cell displays a toxicitythat is the same as or less than the toxicity of an I41 and/or S268mutant of PhΔAD.

The lysyl O-tRNA or the variant O-tRNA optionally includes a recognitionsequence for a four base codon or an amber codon. For example, the lysylO-tRNA or variant can include a recognition sequence for AGGA. Inrelated aspects of the translation system, the lysyl O-tRNA or variantuses an anti-codon loop with the sequence CU(X)_(n)XXXAA. In someembodiments of this aspect, the CU(X)_(n)XXXAA sequence can be CUCUAAAor CUUCCUAA. Examples include the lysyl O-tRNA or variant thereof thatincludes the sequences found in SEQ ID NO:24 or SEQ ID NO:26.

In some embodiments of the invention, the O-RS, the lysyl O-tRNA or thevariants are at least 50% as effective at suppressing a stop or frameshift selector codon as E444G, PhΔAD, or an I41 and/or S268 mutant ofPhΔAD, in combination with an O-tRNA of SEQ ID NO:24 or SEQ ID NO:26. Inother embodiments, the translation system uses an additional O-RS and anadditional O-tRNA, where these additional components suppress a frameshift selector codon that is different from a frame shift selector codonsuppressed by the lysyl O-tRNA or O-tRNA variant and the O-RS thatpreferentially charges the lysyl O-tRNA or O-tRNA variant. In otherembodiments, the translation system suppresses both a four base selectorcodon and a stop selector codon in a target nucleic acid that encodes atarget polypeptide. The four base selector codon optionally uses thesequence AGGA and the stop selector codon optionally uses the sequenceTAG or UAG. In some embodiments, the translation system includes atarget nucleic acid that comprises a four base selector codon. Thetranslation system optionally incorporates a protein encoded by thetarget nucleic acid. For example, this protein can incorporate ahomoglutamine residue.

The translation system optionally incorporates a target nucleic acidthat encodes a four base selector codon and a stop selector codon. Insome aspects, the translation system incorporates a protein encoded bythe target nucleic acid, where the protein includes at least twodifferent unnatural amino acids.

The invention provides, e.g., a translation system that uses a firstorthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA) that recognizes a four base selector codon, afirst orthogonal aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (O-RS) that preferentiallycharges the O-tRNA with a first unnatural amino acid, a second O-tRNAthat recongnizes a stop selector codon, and a second O-RS thatpreferentially charges the second O-tRNA with a second unnatural aminoacid. In one embodiment, the four base selector codon is AGGA, and thestop codon is UAG. Optionally, the translation system is in a cell.

In some embodiments of the translation system, the first or secondO-tRNA is an orthogonal lysyl tRNA (lysyl O-tRNA) or modified variant.Optionally, the first O-tRNA is an orthogonal lysyl tRNA (lysyl O-tRNA)or suitable variant and the second O-tRNA is an orthogonal tyrosyl tRNA(tyrosyl O-tRNA) or suitable variant. Optionally, the translation systemincorporates a nucleic acid encoding at least a four base selector codonand a stop selector codon. In these embodiments, the four base selectorcodon can be AGGA and the stop selector codon can be TAG or UAG, and thenucleic acid to be translated is typically an expressed RNA. In someembodiments, the protein encoded by the nucleic acid incorporates atleast two different unnatural amino acids, for example homoglutamine anda second unnatural amino acid, such as an electrophillic amino acid. Thetranslation system can include any of a variety of unnatural aminoacids, including, e.g., homoglutamine. In one example, the protein inthe translation system is homologous to myoglobin, but includes anunnatural amino acid such as homoglutamine.

The present invention provides compositions that incorporate, but arenot limited to, the amino acid sequences of PhKRS, E444G, PhΔAD, an I41and/or S268 mutant of PhΔAD, or a conservative variant of theseproteins. The invention similarly provides nucleic acids that encodePhKRS, E444G, PhΔAD, an I41 and/or S268 mutant of PhΔAD, and/or anyconservative variant of these sequences. The invention provides nucleicacids that incorporate in part or consist entirely of a tRNA thatcorresponds to SEQ ID NO:24 or SEQ ID NO:26, or any conservativevariants of these sequences.

In other aspects, the invention provides compositions that incorporate,but are not limited to, an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (O-RS),wherein the O-RS preferentially aminoacylates an O-tRNA with ahomoglutamine. This O-RS can include a mutation corresponding to an I41and/or S268 mutation of PhΔAD, or any conservative variant of thisprotein. In some embodiments, the O-RS preferentially aminoacylates theO-tRNA with an efficiency of at least 50% of the efficiency of an I41and/or S268 mutation of PhΔAD. In some embodiments, the O-RS is derivedfrom Pyrococcus horikoshii. In some embodiments where both the O-RS andO-tRNA are present in the composition, the O-tRNA recognizes a four baseselector codon, for example, an AGGA sequence.

In some embodiments where the above composition includes or is presentwithin a cell, the O-RS can be encoded by one or more nucleic acids inthe cell, which can be, for example, an E. coli cell. The compositioncan incorporate a translation system. In compositions that incorporate acell and where the O-RS is encoded by one or more nucleic acids in thecell, the cell can further include an orthogonal-tRNA (O-tRNA) thatrecognizes a first selector codon and a homoglutamine, e.g., where theO-RS preferentially aminoacylates the O-tRNA with the homoglutamine. Insome embodiments, the cell can include a target nucleic acid thatencodes a polypeptide of interest, where the target nucleic acid encodesa selector codon that is recognized by the O-tRNA.

The O-tRNA is optionally encoded entirely or partially by apolynucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:24 or SEQ ID NO:26, ora complementary polynucleotide sequence thereof, and the O-RSincorporates an amino acid sequence corresponding to E444G, PhΔAD, anI41 and/or S268 mutant of PhΔAD, or any conservative variant of thatsequence. It will be appreciated that any nucleic acid sequence hereincan be represented in an RNA or DNA form; thus, unless context dictatesotherwise, sequences such as SEQ ID NO: 24 or 25 optionally include RNAand/or DNA forms, whether expressly shown or not. In some embodiments,the O-RS and O-tRNA are at least 50% as effective at suppressing a stopor frame shift selector codon as E444G, PhΔAD, or an I41 and/or S268mutant of PhΔAD, in combination with an O-tRNA of SEQ ID NO:24 or SEQ IDNO:26. In embodiments where the composition incorporates a cell, thecell can be an E. coli cell. A cell of this composition can furtherinclude an additional different O-tRNA/O-RS pair and an additionaldifferent unnatural amino acid, where the O-tRNA recognizes a secondselector codon and the O-RS preferentially aminoacylates the O-tRNA withthe second unnatural amino acid. The cell can optionally further includea target nucleic acid that encodes the first and seccond selectorcodons. Furthermore still, a cell of this composition can include aprotein encoded by the target nucleic acid, where the proteinincorporates at least two different unnatural amino acids.

The invention also provides a protein that includes at least onehomoglutamine. In some embodiments, the protein includes an amino acidsequence that is at least 75% identical to a sequence of a wild-typetherapeutic protein, a diagnostic protein, an industrial enzyme, or anyportion of these proteins. Optionally, the protein exists in conjunctionwith a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

In another aspect, the invention provides methods for selecting anactive orthogonal-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (O-RS) that loads ahomoglutamine on an orthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA). These methods utilize afirst step of subjecting a population of cells to selection, where thecells collectively include, 1) the O-tRNA, where the O-tRNA isorthogonal to members of the population of cells that comprise theO-tRNA; 2) a plurality of O-RSs that have one or more active O-RSmembers that load the O-tRNA with a homoglutamine in one or more cellsof the population; 3) a polynucleotide that encodes a selectable marker,where the polynucleotide encodes at least one selector codon that isrecognized by the O-tRNA; and, 4) homoglutamine. In this selection, thetarget cell in the population that comprises the active O-RS isidentified by an enhanced suppression efficiency of the selectablemarker as compared to a suppression efficiency of a control cell lackingthe plurality of RSs but harboring the O-tRNA. The second step of themethod is the selection procedure that selects the target cell thatharbors an active O-RS. The invention further provides the orthogonalaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase identified by any of the selection methods.

In some embodiments of these methods, the cells are additionallyselected to eliminate cells that comprise a non-target O-RS that chargesthe O-tRNA with an amino acid other than homoglutamine. In someembodiments, the selection is a positive selection and the selectablemarker is a positive selection marker.

In various embodiments of these methods, the plurality of RSs can comefrom any of a variety of sources, including, but not limited to, mutantRSs, RSs derived from one or more species other than the first speciesor both mutant RSs and RSs derived from a species other than the firstspecies.

The invention also provides methods for producing a protein in a cellwith a homoglutamine at a specified position. The method includes thesteps of growing, in an appropriate medium, a cell that harbors anucleic acid that encodes at least one selector codon and encodes aprotein; e.g., where the cell further includes an orthogonal-tRNA(O-tRNA) that recognizes the selector codon and an orthogonalaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (O-RS) that preferentially aminoacylates theO-tRNA with homoglutamine; providing the homoglutamine; andincorporating the homoglutamine into the specified position in responseto the selector codon, thereby producing the protein. In one embodimentof this method, the amino acid sequence of the O-RS uses entirely, or inpart, the amino acid sequence of E444G, PhΔAD, an I41 and/or S268 mutantof PhΔAD, or a conservative variant thereof.

DEFINITIONS

Before describing the invention in detail, it is to be understood thatthis invention is not limited to particular biological systems, whichcan, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminologyused herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodimentsonly, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specificationand the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” includeplural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Thus,for example, reference to “a cell” includes a combination of two or morecells; reference to “bacteria” includes mixtures of bacteria, and thelike.

Unless defined herein and below in the reminder of the specification,all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning ascommonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which theinvention pertains.

Orthogonal lysyl-tRNA: As used herein, an orthogonal lysyl-tRNA(lysyl-O-tRNA) is a tRNA that is orthogonal to a translation system ofinterest, where the tRNA is: (1) identical or substantially similar to anaturally occurring lysyl tRNA, (2) derived from a naturally occurringlysyl tRNA by natural or artificial mutagenesis, (3) derived by anyprocess that takes a sequence of a wild-type or mutant lysyl tRNAsequence of (1) or (2) into account, (4) homologous to a wild-type ormutant lysyl tRNA; (5) homologous to any example tRNA that is designatedas a substrate for a lysyl tRNA synthetase in TABLE 1, or (6) aconservative variant of any example tRNA that is designated as asubstrate for a lysyl tRNA synthetase in TABLE 1. The lysyl tRNA canexist charged with an amino acid, or in an uncharged state. It is alsoto be understood that a “lysyl-O-tRNA” optionally is charged(aminoacylated) by a cognate synthetase with an amino acid other thanlysine, e.g., with the amino acid homoglutamine. Indeed, it will beappreciated that a lysyl-O-tRNA of the invention is advantageously usedto insert essentially any amino acid, whether natural or artificial,into a growing polypeptide, during translation, in response to aselector codon.

Orthogonal lysyl amino acid synthetase: As used herein, an orthogonallysyl amino acid synthetase (lysyl-O-RS) is an enzyme thatpreferentially aminoacylates the lysyl-O-tRNA with an amino acid in atranslation system of interest. The amino acid that the lysyl-O-RS loadsonto the lysyl-O-tRNA can be any amino acid, whether natural orartificial, and is not limited herein. The synthetase is optionally thesame as or homologous to a naturally occurring lysyl amino acidsynthetase, or the same as or homologous to a synthetase designated as alysyl-O-RS in TABLE 1. For example, the lysyl-O-RS can be a conservativevariant of a lysyl-O-RS of TABLE 1, and/or can be at least 50%, 60%,70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98%, 99% or more identical in sequence to alysyl-O-RS of TABLE 1.

Orthogonal: As used herein, the term “orthogonal” refers to a molecule(e.g., an orthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA) and/or an orthogonal aminoacyl tRNAsynthetase (O-RS)) that functions with endogenous components of a cellwith reduced efficiency as compared to a corresponding molecule that isendogenous to the cell or translation system, or that fails to functionwith endogenous components of the cell. In the context of tRNAs andaminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, orthogonal refers to an inability or reducedefficiency, e.g., less than 20% efficiency, less than 10% efficiency,less than 5% efficiency, or less than 1% efficiency, of an orthogonaltRNA to function with an endogenous tRNA synthetase compared to theability of an endogenous tRNA to function with the endogenous tRNAsynthetase; or of an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase to functionwith an endogenous tRNA compared to the ability of an endogenous tRNAsynthetase to function with the endogenous tRNA. The orthogonal moleculelacks a functionally normal endogenous complementary molecule in thecell. For example, an orthogonal tRNA in a cell is aminoacylated by anyendogenous RS of the cell with reduced or even undetectable efficiency,when compared to aminoacylation of an endogenous tRNA by the endogenousRS. In another example, an orthogonal RS aminoacylates any endogenoustRNA in a cell of interest with reduced or even undetectable efficiency,as compared to aminoacylation of the endogenous tRNA by an endogenousRS. A second orthogonal molecule can be introduced into the cell thatfunctions with the first orthogonal molecule. For example, an orthogonaltRNA/RS pair includes introduced complementary components that functiontogether in the cell with an efficiency (e.g., 45% efficiency, 50%efficiency, 60% efficiency, 70% efficiency, 75% efficiency, 80%efficiency, 90% efficiency, 95% efficiency, or 99% or more efficiency)as compared to that of a control, e.g., a corresponding tRNA/RSendogenous pair, or an active orthogonal pair (e.g., a tyrosylorthogonal tRNA/RS pair).

Cognate: The term “cognate” refers to components that function together,e.g., an orthogonal tRNA and an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetasethat preferentially aminoacylates the orthogonal tRNA. The componentscan also be referred to as being “complementary.”

Preferentially aminoacylates: The term “preferentially aminoacylates”indicates that an O-RS charges a particular tRNA with a given amino acidmore efficiently than it charges other tRNAs. For example, the O-RS cancharge a cognate O-tRNA with an efficiency (e.g., 70% efficiency, 75%efficiency, 85% efficiency, 90% efficiency, 95% efficiency, or 99% ormore efficiency), as compared to the O-RS aminoacylating a non-cognatetRNA (e.g., a tRNA used as a substrate for creating the cognate O-tRNA,e.g., via mutation).

Selector codon: The term “selector codon” refers to a codon recognizedby an O-tRNA in a translation process that is not typically recognizedby an endogenous tRNA. Typical examples include stop codons, codonscomprising 4 our more bases, and/or the like. An O-tRNA anticodon looprecognizes a selector codon, e.g., in an expressed RNA, e.g., an mRNA,and inserts its amino acid into a polypeptide being translated bytranslation system components. For example, in one embodiment herein,the O-tRNA recognizes a selector codon such as a four base codon andadds an unnatural amino acid, such as a homoglutamine, into apolypeptide being produced by the translation process. Selector codonscan include, e.g., nonsense codons, such as stop codons, e.g., amber,ochre, and opal codons; four or more base codons; rare codons; codonsderived from natural or unnatural base pairs and/or the like.

Suppressor tRNA: A suppressor tRNA is a tRNA that alters the reading ofa messenger RNA (mRNA) in a given translation system, e.g., by providinga mechanism for incorporating an amino acid into a polypeptide chain inresponse to a selector codon. For example, a suppressor tRNA can readthrough, e.g., a stop codon, a four base codon, a rare codon, etc.

Suppression activity: As used herein, the term “suppression activity”refers, in general, to the ability of a tRNA (e.g., a suppressor tRNA)to allow translational read-through of a codon (e.g. a selector codonthat is an amber codon or a 4-or-more base codon) that would otherwiseresult in the termination of translation or mistranslation (e.g.,frame-shifting). Suppression activity of a suppressor tRNA can beexpressed as a percentage of translational read-through activityobserved compared to a second suppressor tRNA, or as compared to acontrol system, e.g., a control system lacking an O-RS.

The present invention provides various means by which suppressionactivity can be quantitated. Percent suppression of a particular O-tRNAand ORS against a selector codon (e.g., an amber codon) of interestrefers to the percentage of activity of a given expressed test marker(e.g., LacZ), that includes a selector codon, in a nucleic acid encodingthe expressed test marker, in a translation system of interest, wherethe translation system of interest includes an O-RS and an O-tRNA, ascompared to a positive control construct, where the positive controllacks the O-tRNA, the O-RS and the selector codon. Thus, for example, ifan active positive control marker construct that lacks a selector codonhas an observed activity of X in a given translation system, in unitsrelevant to the marker assay at issue, then percent suppression of atest construct comprising the selector codon is the percentage of X thatthe test marker construct displays under essentially the sameenvironmental conditions as the positive control marker was expressedunder, except that the test marker construct is expressed in atranslation system that also includes the O-tRNA and the O-RS.Typically, the translation system expressing the test marker alsoincludes an amino acid that is recognized by the O-RS and O-tRNA.Optionally, the percent suppression measurement can be refined bycomparison of the test marker to a “background” or “negative” controlmarker construct, which includes the same selector codon as the testmarker, but in a system that does not include the O-tRNA, O-RS and/orrelevant amino acid recognized by the O-tRNA and/or O-RS. This negativecontrol is useful in normalizing percent suppression measurements toaccount for background signal effects from the marker in the translationsystem of interest.

Suppression efficiency can be determined by any of a number of assaysknown in the art. For example, a β-galactosidase reporter assay can beused, e.g., a derivatived lacZ plasmid (where the construct has aselector codon n the lacZ nucleic acid sequence) is introduced intocells from an appropriate organism (e.g., an organism where theorthogonal components can be used) along with plasmid comprising anO-tRNA of the invention. A cognate synthetase can also be introduced(either as a polypeptide or a polynucleotide that encodes the cognatesynthetase when expressed). The cells are grown in media to a desireddensity, e.g., to an OD₆₀₀ of about 0.5, and β-galactosidase assays areperformed, e.g., using the BetaFluor™ β-Galactosidase Assay Kit(Novagen). Percent suppression can be calculated as the percentage ofactivity for a sample relative to a comparable control, e.g., the valueobserved from the derivatized lacZ construct, where the construct has acorresponding sense codon at desired position rather than a selectorcodon.

Translation system: The term “translation system” refers to thecomponents that incorporate an amino acid into a growing polypeptidechain (protein). Components of a translation system can include, e.g.,ribosomes, tRNAs, synthetases, mRNA and the like. The O-tRNA and/or theO-RSs of the invention can be added to or be part of an in vitro or invivo translation system, e.g., in a non-eukaryotic cell, e.g., abacterium (such as E. coli), or in a eukaryotic cell, e.g., a yeastcell, a mammalian cell, a plant cell, an algae cell, a fungus cell, aninsect cell, and/or the like.

Unnatural amino acid: As used herein, the term “unnatural amino acid”refers to any amino acid, modified amino acid, and/or amino acidanalogue, such as a homoglutamine, that is not one of the 20 commonnaturally occurring amino acids or the rare natural amino acids selenocysteine or pyrrolysine.

Derived from: As used herein, the term “derived from” refers to acomponent that is isolated from or made using a specified molecule ororganism, or information from the specified molecule or organism.

Positive selection or screening marker: As used herein, the term“positive selection or screening marker” refers to a marker that whenpresent, e.g., expressed, activated, or the like, results inidentification of a cell that comprises a trait corresponding to themarker, e.g., cells with the positive selection marker, from thosewithout the trait.

Negative selection or screening marker: As used herein, the term“negative selection or screening marker” refers to a marker that, whenpresent, e.g., expressed, activated, or the like, allows identificationof a cell that does not comprise a selected property or trait (e.g., ascompared to a cell that does possess the property or trait).

Reporter: As used herein, the term “reporter” refers to a component thatcan be used to identify and/or select target components of a system ofinterest. For example, a reporter can include a protein, e.g., anenzyme, that confers antibiotic resistance or sensitivity (e.g.,β-lactamase, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), and the like), afluorescent screening marker (e.g., green fluorescent protein (e.g.,(GFP), YFP, EGFP, RFP, etc.), a luminescent marker (e.g., a fireflyluciferase protein), an affinity based screening marker, or positive ornegative selectable marker genes such as lacZ, β-gal/lacZ(β-galactosidase), Adh (alcohol dehydrogenase), his3, ura3, leu2, lys2,or the like.

Eukaryote: As used herein, the term “eukaryote” refers to organismsbelonging to the phylogenetic domain Eucarya, such as animals (e.g.,mammals, insects, reptiles, birds, etc.), ciliates, plants (e.g.,monocots, dicots, algae, etc.), fungi, yeasts, flagellates,microsporidia, protists, etc.

Non-eukaryote: As used herein, the term “non-eukaryote” refers tonon-eukaryotic organisms. For example, a non-eukaryotic organism canbelong to the Eubacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli, Thermus thermophilus,Bacillus stearothermophilus, etc.) phylogenetic domain, or the Archaea(e.g., Methanococcus jannaschii (Mj), Methanosarcina mazei (Mm),Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (Mt), Methanococcus maripaludis,Methanopyrus kandleri, Halobacterium such as Haloferax volcanii andHalobacterium species NRC-1, Archaeoglobus fu lgidus (Af), Pyrococcusfuriosus (Pf), Pyrococcus horikoshii (Ph), Pyrobaculum aerophilum,Pyrococcus abyssi, Sulfolobus solfataricus (Ss), Sulfolobus tokodaii,Aeuropyrum pernix (Ap), Thermoplasma acidophilum, Thermoplasmavolcanium, etc.) phylogenetic domains.

Conservative variant: As used herein, the term “conservative variant,”in the context of a translation component, refers to a translationcomponent, e.g., a conservative variant O-tRNA or a conservative variantO-RS, that functionally performs similar to a base component that theconservative variant is similar to, e.g., an O-tRNA or O-RS, havingvariations in the sequence as compared to a reference O-tRNA or O-RS.For example, an O-RS will aminoacylate a complementary O-tRNA or aconservative variant O-tRNA with an unnatural amino acid, e.g., ahomoglutamine, although the O-tRNA and the conservative variant O-tRNAdo not have the same sequence. The conservative variant can have, e.g.,one variation, two variations, three variations, four variations, orfive or more variations in sequence, as long as the conservative variantis complementary to the corresponding O-tRNA or O-RS.

Selection or screening agent: As used herein, the term “selection orscreening agent” refers to an agent that, when present, allows forselection/screening of certain components from a population. Forexample, a selection or screening agent can be, but is not limited to,e.g., a nutrient, an antibiotic, a wavelength of light, an antibody, anexpressed polynucleotide, or the like. The selection agent can bevaried, e.g., by concentration, intensity, etc.

In response to: As used herein, the term “in response to” refers to theprocess in which a tRNA of the invention recognizes a selector codon andincorporates a relevant amino acid, e.g., an unnatural amino acid suchas homoglutamine, which is carried by the tRNA, into the growingpolypeptide chain.

Encode: As used herein, the term “encode” refers to any process wherebythe information in a polymeric macromolecule or sequence string is usedto direct the production of a second molecule or sequence string that isdifferent from the first molecule or sequence string. As used herein,the term is used broadly, and can have a variety of applications. In oneaspect, the term “encode” describes the process of semi-conservative DNAreplication, where one strand of a double-stranded DNA molecule is usedas a template to encode a newly synthesized complementary sister strandby a DNA-dependent DNA polymerase.

In another aspect, the term “encode” refers to any process whereby theinformation in one molecule is used to direct the production of a secondmolecule that has a different chemical nature from the first molecule.For example, a DNA molecule can encode an RNA molecule (e.g., by theprocess of transcription incorporating a DNA-dependent RNA polymeraseenzyme). Also, an RNA molecule can encode a polypeptide, as in theprocess of translation. When used to describe the process oftranslation, the term “encode” also extends to the triplet codon thatencodes an amino acid. In some aspects, an RNA molecule can encode a DNAmolecule, e.g., by the process of reverse transcription incorporating anRNA-dependent DNA polymerase. In another aspect, a DNA molecule canencode a polypeptide, where it is understood that “encode” as used inthat case incorporates both the processes of transcription andtranslation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 provides a sequence alignment of archaeal tRNA^(Lys) sequences.Genomic sequences derived from Pa, Pyrococcus abyssi; Pf, Pyrococcusfuriosus; Ph, Pyrococcus horikoshii; Pya, Pyrobaculum aerophilum; Ta,Thermoplasma acidophilum; Tv, Thermoplasma volcanum; Af, Archaeoglobusfulgidus; Hh, Halobacterium sp. NRC-1; Mj, Methanococcus jannaschii; Mt,Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum; Mm, Methanosarcina mazei; St,Sulfolobus tokodaii; Ss, Sulfolobus solfataricus; Ap, Aeropyrum pernixwere aligned with the GCG program pileup and displayed with the programprettybox.

FIG. 2, Panels A and B provides histograms illustrating cross-speciesaminoacylation in vitro. (A) Aminoacylation of whole E. coli tRNA, or(B) whole halobacterial tRNA by EcKRS (□), PhKRS (▪), or no synthetase(▴). Assays were performed in 20 μL reactions containing 50 mM Tris-Cl,pH 7.5, 30 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl₂, 3 mM glutathione, 0.1 mg/mL BSA, 10 mMATP, 1 μM [3H] lysine (Amersham), 750 nM synthetase, and 0, 2, 10, or 40μM whole tRNA at 37° C. for 20 minutes.

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a consensus-derived amber suppressortRNA. The consensus for the family of archaeal tRNA^(Lys) sequences isrepresented in a cloverleaf configuration. The anticodon loop waschanged from the consensus to CUCUAAA to generate AK_(CUA).

FIG. 4 provides a histogram illustrating in vivo activity of theorthogonal synthetase-tRNA pair. β-Galactosidase activity was determinedin quadruplicate for GeneHogs cells (Invitrogen) transformed with theplasmids shown, or no plasmids. The E444G mutant of PhKRS was expressedfrom plasmid pKQ. Plasmid pKQ was used for samples containing nosynthetase. AK_(CUA) was expressed from plasmid pACGFP, and plasmidpACGFP was used for samples containing no tRNA. The lacZ reporter geneswere from plasmid pLASC-lacZ. Cells were grown in 2YT media with theappropriate antibiotics to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.5 then assayed by the methodsof Miller (Miller, (1972) Experiments in molecular genetics, Cold SpringHarbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.).

FIG. 5. Construction of amber and four-base suppressor tRNAs. An ambersuppressor tRNA was constructed from the multiple sequence alignments ofmany tRNA^(lys) sequences. An Orthogonal AGGA suppressor tRNA wasidentified by selection from an acceptor stem library.

FIGS. 6A and 6B. FIG. 6A shows the structure of the PhKRS active site.Residues E41 and Y268 make specific contacts with the lysine substrate.These residues were simultaneously randomized for the construction ofactive site libraries. FIG. 6B shows the structures of various aminoacids.

FIGS. 7A and 7B provide chemifluorescence phosphoimages illustratingexpression of myoglobin by AGGA suppression: FIG. 7A, the myoglobin genewith an AGGA codon at position G24 was expressed in the presence of theAK_(UCCU) tRNA and either PhΔAD, an hGln-specific variant, or JYRS.Expression of myoglobin by amber suppression at position S4 wassimilarly attempted with PhΔAD or JYRS. b, hGln was incorporated by AGGAsuppression at position 24 and AzPhe was incorporated by ambersuppression at position 75 in a single polypeptide.

FIG. 8. MALDI-TOF analysis of tryptic fragments containing homoglutamineor lysine.

FIG. 9. Electrospray MS analysis of full-length myglobin containinghomoglutamine at position 24 and O-methyl-tyrosine at position 75.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In order to add additional synthetic amino acids, such as ahomoglutamine, to the genetic code, in vivo, new orthogonal pairs of anaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and a tRNA are needed that can functionefficiently in the translational machinery, but that are “orthogonal,”to the translation system at issue, meaning that the pairs functionindependently of the synthetases and tRNAs endogenous to the translationsystem. Desired characteristics of the orthologous pair include tRNAthat decode or recognize only a specific new codon, e.g., a selectorcodon, that is not decoded by any endogenous tRNA, and aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetases that preferentially aminoacylate (or charge) its cognatetRNA with only a specific non-natural amino acid, e.g., a homoglutamine.The O-tRNA is also desireably not aminoacylated by endogenoussynthetases. For example, in E. coli, an orthogonal pair will include anaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that does not substantially aminoacylate anyof the endogenous tRNAs, e.g., of which there are 40 in E. coli, and anorthogonal tRNA that is not aminoacylated by any of the endogenoussynthetases, e.g., of which there are 21 in E. coli.

Here we report the generation of a new orthogonal synthetase/tRNA pairderived from archaeal tRNA^(Lys) sequences that efficiently andselectively incorporate the amino acid homoglutamine (hGln) intomyoglobin in response to the four-base selector codon AGGA. Frameshiftsuppression with hGln does not significantly affect protein yields orcell growth rates, and was shown to be mutually orthogonal withsuppression of TAG by a second O-tRNA-ORS pair. This work shows thatneither the number of available triplet codons, nor the translationalmachinery itself, represents a significant barrier to further expansionof the code.

In order to encode unnatural amino acids with quadruplet codons in vivo,one has to generate an orthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA) that uniquely recognizesthis codon and a corresponding synthetase that uniquely aminoacylatesonly this O-tRNA with an unnatural amino acid of interest. Because theanticodon loop of the previously generated orthogonal M. jannaschiiamber suppressor tRNA is a key recognition element for the cognatesynthetase, JYRS, it was difficult to extend this loop to decode afour-base codon. Although it may be possible to relax the anticodonbinding specificity of JYRS, it would likely be difficult to constructmutually orthogonal pairs that distinguish amber and four-basesuppressors using exclusively the anticodon sequence. Therefore, asystem that permits the simultaneous incorporation of two or moredifferent unnatural amino acids into a polypeptide in response to two ormore different selector codons are achieved herein using orthogonalpairs with different origins.

This invention provides compositions of and methods for identifying andproducing additional orthogonal tRNA-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase pairs,e.g., O-tRNA/O-RS pairs that can be used to incorporate unnatural aminoacids, e.g., homoglutamine. An example O-tRNA of the invention iscapable of mediating incorporation of a homoglutamine into a proteinthat is encoded by a polynucleotide, which comprises a selector codonthat is recognized by the O-tRNA, e.g., in vivo. The anticodon loop ofthe O-tRNA recognizes the selector codon on an mRNA and incorporates itsamino acid, e.g., a homoglutamine, at this site in the polypeptide. Anorthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase of the invention preferentiallyaminoacylates (or charges) its O-tRNA with only a specific unnaturalamino acid.

Orthogonal tRNA/Orthogonal Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and Pairs Thereof

Translation systems that are suitable for making proteins that includeone or more unnatural amino acids are described in InternationalPublication Numbers WO 2002/086075, entitled “METHODS AND COMPOSITIONFOR THE PRODUCTION OF ORTHOGANOL tRNA-AMINOACYL-tRNA SYNTHETASE PAIRS”and WO 2002/085923, entitled “IN VIVO INCORPORATION OF UNNATURAL AMINOACIDS.” In addition, see International Application NumberPCT/US2004/011786, filed Apr. 16, 2004. Each of these applications isincorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Such translationsystems generally comprise cells (which can be non-eukaryotic cells suchas E. coli, or eukaryotic cells such as yeast) that include anorthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA), an orthogonal aminoacyl tRNA synthetase(O-RS), and an unnatural amino acid (in the present invention,homoglutamine is an example of such an unnatural amino acod), where theO-RS aminoacylates the O-tRNA with the homoglutamine. An orthogonal pairof the invention includes an O-tRNA, e.g., a suppressor tRNA, aframeshift tRNA, or the like, and an O-RS. Individual components arealso provided in the invention.

In general, when an orthogonal pair recognizes a selector codon andloads an amino acid in response to the selector codon, the orthogonalpair is said to “suppress” the selector codon. That is, a selector codonthat is not recognized by the translation system's (e.g., cell's)endogenous machinery is not ordinarily translated, which can result inblocking production of a polypeptide that would otherwise be translatedfrom the nucleic acid. An O-tRNA of the invention recognizes a selectorcodon and includes at least about, e.g., a 45%, a 50%, a 60%, a 75%, a80%, or a 90% or more suppression efficiency in the presence of acognate synthetase in response to a selector codon as compared to anO-tRNA comprising or encoded by a polynucleotide sequence as set forthin the sequence listing herein. The O-RS aminoacylates the O-tRNA withan unnatural amino acid of interest, such as a homoglutamine. The celluses the O-tRNA/O-RS pair to incorporate the unnatural amino acid into agrowing polypeptide chain, e.g., via a nucleic acid that comprises apolynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide of interest, where thepolynucleotide comprises a selector codon that is recognized by theO-tRNA. In certain desireable aspects, the cell can include anadditional O-tRNA/O-RS pair, where the additional O-tRNA is loaded bythe additional O-RS with a different unnatural amino acid. For example,one of the O-tRNAs can recognize a four base codon and the other canrecognize a stop codon. Alternately, multiple different stop codons ormultiple different four base codons can specifically recognize differentselector codons.

In certain embodiments of the invention, a cell such as an E. coli cellthat includes an orthogonal tRNA-(O-tRNA), an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetase (O-RS), a homoglutamine and a nucleic acid that comprises apolynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide of interest, where thepolynucleotide comprises the selector codon that is recognized by theO-tRNA. The translation system can also be a cell-free system, e.g., anyof a variety of commercially available “in vitro”transcription/translation systems in combination with an O-tRNA/ORS pairand an unnatural amino acid as described herein.

In one embodiment, the suppression efficiency of the O-RS and the O-tRNAtogether is about, e.g., 5 fold, 10 fold, 15 fold, 20 fold, or 25 foldor more greater than the suppression efficiency of the O-tRNA lackingthe O-RS. In one aspect, the suppression efficiency of the O-RS and theO-tRNA together is at least about, e.g., 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 60%, 75%,80%, or 90% or more of the suppression efficiency of an orthogonalsynthetase pair as set forth in the sequence listings herein.

As noted, the invention optionally includes multiple O-tRNA/O-RS pairsin a cell or other translation system, which allows incorporation ofmore than one unnatural amino acid, e.g., a homoglutamine and anotherunnatural amino acid. For example, the cell can further include anadditional different O-tRNA/O-RS pair and a second unnatural amino acid,where this additional O-tRNA recognizes a second selector codon and thisadditional O-RS preferentially aminoacylates the O-tRNA with the secondunnatural amino acid. For example, a cell that includes an O-tRNA/O-RSpair (where the O-tRNA recognizes, e.g., an amber selector codon), canfurther comprise a second orthogonal pair, e.g., leucyl, lysyl,glutamyl, etc., (where the second O-tRNA recognizes a different selectorcodon, e.g., an opal, four-base codon, or the like). Desirably, thedifferent orthogonal pairs are derived from different sources, which canfacilitate recognition of different selector codons.

The O-tRNA and/or the O-RS can be naturally occurring or can be, e.g.,derived by mutation of a naturally occurring tRNA and/or RS, e.g., bygenerating libraries of tRNAs and/or libraries of RSs, from any of avariety of organisms and/or by using any of a variety of availablemutation strategies. For example, one strategy for producing anorthogonal tRNA/aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase pair involves importing aheterologous (to the host cell) tRNA/synthetase pair from, e.g., asource other than the host cell, or multiple sources, into the hostcell. The properties of the heterologous synthetase candidate include,e.g., that it does not charge any host cell tRNA, and the properties ofthe heterologous tRNA candidate include, e.g., that it is notaminoacylated by any host cell synthetase. In addition, the heterologoustRNA is orthogonal to all host cell synthetases.

A second strategy for generating an orthogonal pair involves generatingmutant libraries from which to screen and/or select an O-tRNA or O-RS.These strategies can also be combined.

Orthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA)

An orthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA) of the invention desireably mediatesincorporation of an unnatural amino acid, such as homoglutamine, into aprotein that is encoded by a polynucleotide that comprises a selectorcodon that is recognized by the O-tRNA, e.g., in vivo or in vitro. Incertain embodiments, an O-tRNA of the invention includes at least about,e.g., a 45%, a 50%, a 60%, a 75%, a 80%, or a 90% or more suppressionefficiency in the presence of a cognate synthetase in response to aselector codon as compared to an O-tRNA comprising or encoded by apolynucleotide sequence as set forth in the O-tRNA sequences in thesequence listing herein.

Suppression efficiency can be determined by any of a number of assaysknown in the art. For example, a β-galactosidase reporter assay can beused, e.g., a derivatized lacZ plasmid (where the construct has aselector codon n the lacZ nucleic acid sequence) is introduced intocells from an appropriate organism (e.g., an organism where theorthogonal components can be used) along with plasmid comprising anO-tRNA of the invention. A cognate synthetase can also be introduced(either as a polypeptide or a polynucleotide that encodes the cognatesynthetase when expressed). The cells are grown in media to a desireddensity, e.g., to an OD₆₀₀ of about 0.5, and β-galactosidase assays areperformed, e.g., using the BetaFluor™ β-Galactosidase Assay Kit(Novagen). Percent suppression can be calculated as the percentage ofactivity for a sample relative to a comparable control, e.g., the valueobserved from the derivatived lacZ construct, where the construct has acorresponding sense codon at desired position rather than a selectorcodon.

Examples of O-tRNAs of the invention are set forth in the sequencelisting herein. See also, the tables, examples and figures herein forsequences of exemplary O-tRNA and O-RS molecules. See also, the sectionentitled “Nucleic Acid and Polypeptide Sequence and Variants” herein. Inan RNA molecule, such as an O-RS mRNA, or O-tRNA molecule, Thymine (T)is replace with Uracil (U) relative to a given sequence (or vice versafor a coding DNA), or complement thereof. Additional modifications tothe bases can also be present.

The invention also includes conservative variations of O-tRNAscorresponding to particular O-tRNAs herein. For example, conservativevariations of O-tRNA include those molecules that function like theparticular O-tRNAs, e.g., as in the sequence listing herein and thatmaintain the tRNA L-shaped structure by virtue of appropriateself-complementarity, but that do not have a sequence identical tothose, e.g., in the sequence listing, figures or examples herein (and,desireably, are other than wild type tRNA molecules). See also, thesection herein entitled “Nucleic acids and Polypeptides Sequence andVariants.”

The composition comprising an O-tRNA can further include an orthogonalaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (O-RS), where the O-RS preferentiallyaminoacylates the O-tRNA with an unnatural amino acid such ashomoglutamine. In certain embodiments, a composition including an O-tRNAcan further include a translation system (e.g., in vitro or in vivo). Anucleic acid that comprises a polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptideof interest, where the polynucleotide comprises a selector codon that isrecognized by the O-tRNA, or a combination of one or more of these canalso be present in the cell. See also, the section herein entitled“Orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.”

Methods of producing an orthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA) are also a feature ofthe invention. An O-tRNA produced by the method is also a feature of theinvention. In certain embodiments of the invention, the O-tRNAs can beproduced by generating a library of mutants. The library of mutant tRNAscan be generated using various mutagenesis techniques known in the art.For example, the mutant tRNAs can be generated by site-specificmutations, random point mutations, homologous recombination, DNAshuffling or other recursive mutagenesis methods, chimeric constructionor any combination thereof.

Additional mutations can be introduced at a specific position(s), e.g.,at a nonconservative position(s), or at a conservative position, at arandomized position(s), or a combination of both in a desired loop orregion of a tRNA, e.g., an anticodon loop, the acceptor stem, D arm orloop, variable loop, TPC arm or loop, other regions of the tRNAmolecule, or a combination thereof. Typically, mutations in a tRNAinclude mutating the anticodon loop of each member of the library ofmutant tRNAs to allow recognition of a selector codon. The method canfurther include adding an additional sequence (CCA) to a terminus of theO-tRNA. Typically, an O-tRNA possesses an improvement of orthogonalityfor a desired organism compared to the starting material, e.g., theplurality of tRNA sequences, while preserving its affinity towards adesired RS.

The methods optionally include analyzing the similarity (and/or inferredhomology) of sequences of tRNAs and/or aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases todetermine potential candidates for an O-tRNA, O-RS and/or pairs thereof,that appear to be orthogonal for a specific organism. Computer programsknown in the art and described herein can be used for the analysis,e.g., BLAST and pileup programs can be used. In one example, to choosepotential orthogonal translational components for use in E. coli, aprokaryotic organism, a synthetase and/or a tRNA is chosen that does notdisplay close sequence similarity to prokaryotic organisms.

Typically, an O-tRNA is obtained by subjecting to, e.g., negativeselection, a population of cells of a first species, where the cellscomprise a member of the plurality of potential O-tRNAs. The negativeselection eliminates cells that comprise a member of the library ofpotential O-tRNAs that is aminoacylated by an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase(RS) that is endogenous to the cell. This provides a pool of tRNAs thatare orthogonal to the cell of the first species.

In certain embodiments, in the negative selection, a selector codon(s)is introduced into a polynucleotide that encodes a negative selectionmarker, e.g., an enzyme that confers antibiotic resistance, e.g.,β-lactamase, an enzyme that confers a detectable product, e.g.,β-galactosidase, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), e.g., a toxicproduct, such as barnase, at a nonessential position (e.g., stillproducing a functional barnase), etc. Screening/selection is optionallydone by growing the population of cells in the presence of a selectiveagent (e.g., an antibiotic, such as ampicillin). In one embodiment, theconcentration of the selection agent is varied.

For example, to measure the activity of suppressor tRNAs, a selectionsystem is used that is based on the in vivo suppression of selectorcodon, e.g., nonsense or frameshift mutations introduced into apolynucleotide that encodes a negative selection marker, e.g., a genefor β-lactamase (bla). For example, polynucleotide variants, e.g., blavariants, with a selector codon at a certain position (e.g., A184), areconstructed. Cells, e.g., bacteria, are transformed with thesepolynucleotides. In the case of an orthogonal tRNA, which cannot beefficiently charged by endogenous E. coli synthetases, antibioticresistance, e.g., ampicillin resistance, should be about or less thanthat for a bacteria transformed with no plasmid. If the tRNA is notorthogonal, or if a heterologous synthetase capable of charging the tRNAis co-expressed in the system, a higher level of antibiotic, e.g.,ampicillin, resistance is be observed. Cells, e.g., bacteria, are chosenthat are unable to grow on LB agar plates with antibiotic concentrationsabout equal to cells transformed with no plasmids.

In the case of a toxic product (e.g., ribonuclease or barnase), when amember of the plurality of potential tRNAs is aminoacylated byendogenous host, e.g., Escherichia coli synthetases (i.e., it is notorthogonal to the host, e.g., Escherichia coli synthetases), theselector codon is suppressed and the toxic polynucleotide productproduced leads to cell death. Cells harboring orthogonal tRNAs ornon-functional tRNAs survive.

In one embodiment, the pool of tRNAs that are orthogonal to a desiredorganism are then subjected to a positive selection in which a selectorcodon is placed in a positive selection marker, e.g., encoded by a drugresistance gene, such a β-lactamase gene. The positive selection isperformed on a cell comprising a polynucleotide encoding or comprising amember of the pool of tRNAs that are orthogonal to the cell, apolynucleotide encoding a positive selection marker, and apolynucleotide encoding a cognate RS. In certain embodiments, the secondpopulation of cells comprises cells that were not eliminated by thenegative selection. The polynucleotides are expressed in the cell andthe cell is grown in the presence of a selection agent, e.g.,ampicillin. tRNAs are then selected for their ability to beaminoacylated by the coexpressed cognate synthetase and to insert anamino acid in response to this selector codon. Typically, these cellsshow an enhancement in suppression efficiency compared to cellsharboring non-functional tRNA(s), or tRNAs that cannot efficiently berecognized by the synthetase of interest. The cell harboring thenon-functional tRNAs or tRNAs that are not efficiently recognized by thesynthetase of interest, are sensitive to the antibiotic. Therefore,tRNAs that: (i) are not substrates for endogenous host, e.g.,Escherichia coli, synthetases; (ii) can be aminoacylated by thesynthetase of interest; and (iii) are functional in translation, surviveboth selections.

Accordingly, the same marker can be either a positive or negativemarker, depending on the context in which it is screened. That is, themarker is a positive marker if it is screened for, but a negative markerif screened against.

The stringency of the selection, e.g., the positive selection, thenegative selection or both the positive and negative selection, in theabove described-methods, optionally includes varying the selectionstringency. For example, because barnase is an extremely toxic protein,the stringency of the negative selection can be controlled byintroducing different numbers of selector codons into the barnase geneand/or by using an inducible promoter. In another example, theconcentration of the selection or screening agent is varied (e.g.,ampicillin concentration). In one aspect of the invention, thestringency is varied because the desired activity can be low duringearly rounds. Thus, less stringent selection criteria are applied inearly rounds and more stringent criteria are applied in later rounds ofselection. In certain embodiments, the negative selection, the positiveselection or both the negative and positive selection can be repeatedmultiple times. Multiple different negative selection markers, positiveselection markers or both negative and positive selection markers can beused. In certain embodiments, the positive and negative selection markercan be the same.

Other types of selections/screening can be used in the invention forproducing orthogonal translational components, e.g., an O-tRNA, an O-RS,and an O-tRNA/O-RS pair that loads an unnatural amino acid such ashomoglutamine in response to a selector codon. For example, the negativeselection marker, the positive selection marker or both the positive andnegative selection markers can include a marker that fluoresces orcatalyzes a luminescent reaction in the presence of a suitable reactant.In another embodiment, a product of the marker is detected byfluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) or by luminescence.Optionally, the marker includes an affinity based screening marker. Seealso, Francisco, J. A., et al., (1993) Production andfluorescence-activated cell sorting of Escherichia coli expressing afunctional antibody fragment on the external surface. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA. 90:10444-8.

Additional methods for producing a recombinant orthogonal tRNA can befound, e.g., in International patent applications WO 2002/086075,entitled “Methods and compositions for the production of orthogonaltRNA-aminoacyltRNA synthetase pairs;” and, U.S. Ser. No. 60/479,931, and60/496,548 entitled “EXPANDING THE EUKARYOTIC GENETIC CODE.” See alsoForster et al., (2003) Programming peptidomimetic synthetases bytranslating genetic codes designed de novo PNAS 100(11):6353-6357; and,Feng et al., (2003), Expanding tRNA recognition of a tRNA synthetase bya single amino acid change, PNAS 100(10): 5676-5681.

Orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (O-RS)

An O-RS of the invention preferentially aminoacylates an O-tRNA with anunnatural amino acid such as homoglutamine in vitro or in vivo. An O-RSof the invention can be provided to the translation system, e.g., acell, by a polypeptide that includes an O-RS and/or by a polynucleotidethat encodes an O-RS or a portion thereof. For example, an example O-RScomprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in the sequence listingand examples herein, or a conservative variation thereof. In anotherexample, an O-RS, or a portion thereof, is encoded by a polynucleotidesequence that encodes an amino acid comprising sequence in the sequencelisting or examples herein, or a complementary polynucleotide sequencethereof. See, e.g., the tables and examples herein for sequences ofexemplary O-RS molecules. See also, the section entitled “Nucleic Acidand Polypeptide Sequence and Variants” herein.

Methods for identifying an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (O-RS),e.g., an O-RS, for use with an O-tRNA, are also a feature of theinvention. For example, a method includes subjecting to selection, e.g.,positive selection, a population of cells of a first species, where thecells individually comprise: 1) a member of a plurality ofaminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (RSs), (e.g., the plurality of RSs caninclude mutant RSs, RSs derived from a species other than the firstspecies or both mutant RSs and RSs derived from a species other than thefirst species); 2) the orthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA) (e.g., from one or morespecies); and 3) a polynucleotide that encodes an (e.g., positive)selection marker and comprises at least one selector codon. Cells areselected or screened for those that show an enhancement in suppressionefficiency compared to cells lacking or with a reduced amount of themember of the plurality of RSs. Suppression efficiency can be measuredby techniques known in the art and as described herein. Cells having anenhancement in suppression efficiency comprise an active RS thataminoacylates the O-tRNA. A level of aminoacylation (in vitro or invivo) by the active RS of a first set of tRNAs from the first species iscompared to the level of aminoacylation (in vitro or in vivo) by theactive RS of a second set of tRNAs from the second species. The level ofaminoacylation can be determined by a detectable substance (e.g., alabeled amino acid or unnatural amino acid, e.g., a labeledhomoglutamine). The active RS that more efficiently aminoacylates thesecond set of tRNAs compared to the first set of tRNAs is typicallyselected, thereby providing an efficient (optimized) orthogonalaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase for use with the O-tRNA. An O-RS, identifiedby the method, is also a feature of the invention.

Any of a number of assays can be used to determine aminoacylation. Theseassays can be performed in vitro or in vivo. For example, in vitroaminoacylation assays are described in, e.g., Hoben and Soll (1985)Methods Enzymol. 113:55-59. Aminoacylation can also be determined byusing a reporter along with orthogonal translation components anddetecting the reporter in a cell expressing a polynucleotide comprisingat least one selector codon that encodes a protein. See also, WO2002/085923, entitled “IN VIVO INCORPORATION OF UNNATURAL AMINO ACIDS;”and International Application Number PCT/US2004/011786, filed Apr. 16,2004.

Identified O-RS can be further manipulated to alter substratespecificity of the synthetase, so that only a desired unnatural aminoacid, e.g., a homoglutamine, but not any of the common 20 amino acids,are charged to the O-tRNA. Methods to generate an orthogonal aminoacyltRNA synthetase with a substrate specificity for an unnatural amino acidinclude mutating the synthetase, e.g., at the active site in thesynthetase, at the editing mechanism site in the synthetase, atdifferent sites by combining different domains of synthetases, or thelike, and applying a selection process. A strategy is used, which isbased on the combination of a positive selection followed by a negativeselection. In the positive selection, suppression of the selector codonintroduced at a nonessential position(s) of a positive marker allowscells to survive under positive selection pressure. In the presence ofboth natural and unnatural amino acids, survivors thus encode activesynthetases charging the orthogonal suppressor tRNA with either anatural or unnatural amino acid. In the negative selection, suppressionof a selector codon introduced at a nonessential position(s) of anegative marker removes synthetases with natural amino acidspecificities. Survivors of the negative and positive selection encodesynthetases that aminoacylate (charge) the orthogonal suppressor tRNAwith unnatural amino acids only. These synthetases can then be subjectedto further mutagenesis, e.g., DNA shuffling or other recursivemutagenesis methods.

A library of mutant O-RSs can be generated using various mutagenesistechniques known in the art. For example, the mutant RSs can begenerated by site-specific mutations, random point mutations, homologousrecombination, DNA shuffling or other recursive mutagenesis methods,chimeric construction or any combination thereof. For example, a libraryof mutant RSs can be produced from two or more other, e.g., smaller,less diverse “sub-libraries.” Chimeric libraries of RSs are alsoincluded in the invention. It should be noted that libraries of tRNAsynthetases from various organism (e.g., microorganisms such aseubacteria or archaebacteria) such as libraries that comprise naturaldiversity (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,238,884 to Short et al; U.S. Pat.No. 5,756,316 to Schallenberger et al; U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,431 toPetersen et al; U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,485 to Thompson et al; U.S. Pat. No.5,958,672 to Short et al), are optionally constructed and screened fororthogonal pairs.

Once the synthetases are subject to the positive and negativeselection/screening strategy, these synthetases can then be subjected tofurther mutagenesis. For example, a nucleic acid that encodes the O-RScan be isolated; a set of polynucleotides that encode mutated O-RSs(e.g., by random mutagenesis, site-specific mutagenesis, recombinationor any combination thereof) can be generated from the nucleic acid; and,these individual steps or a combination of these steps can be repeateduntil a mutated O-RS is obtained that preferentially aminoacylates theO-tRNA with the unnatural amino acid, e.g., a homoglutamine. In oneaspect of the invention, the steps are performed multiple times, e.g.,at least two times.

Additional levels of selection/screening stringency can also be used inthe methods of the invention, for producing O-tRNA, O-RS, or pairsthereof. The selection or screening stringency can be varied on one orboth steps of the method to produce an O-RS. This could include, e.g.,varying the amount of selection/screening agent that is used, etc.Additional rounds of positive and/or negative selections can also beperformed. Selecting or screening can also comprise one or more of achange in amino acid permeability, a change in translation efficiency, achange in translational fidelity, etc. Typically, the one or more changeis based upon a mutation in one or more gene in an organism in which anorthogonal tRNA-tRNA synthetase pair is used to produce protein.

Additional general details for producing O-RS, and altering thesubstrate specificity of the synthetase can be found in WO 2002/086075entitled “Methods and compositions for the production of orthogonaltRNA-aminoacyltRNA synthetase pairs;” and International ApplicationNumber PCT/US2004/011786, filed Apr. 16, 2004.

Source and Host Organisms

The translational components of the invention can be derived fromnon-eukaryotic organisms. For example, the orthogonal O-tRNA can bederived from a non-eukaryotic organism (or a combination of organisms),e.g., an archaebacterium, such as Methanococcus jannaschii,Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, Halobacterium such as Haloferaxvolcanii and Halobacterium species NRC-1, Archaeoglobus fulgidus,Pyrococcus furiosus, Pyrococcus horikoshii, Aeuropyrum pernix,Methanococcus maripaludis, Methanopyrus kandleri, Methanosarcina mazei(Mm), Pyrobaculum aerophilum, Pyrococcus abyssi, Sulfolobus solfataricus(Ss), Sulfolobus tokodaii, Thermoplasma acidophilum, Thermoplasmavolcanium, or the like, or a eubacterium, such as Escherichia coli,Thermus thermophilus, Bacillus stearothermphilus, or the like, while theorthogonal O-RS can be derived from a non-eukaryotic organism (or acombination of organisms), e.g., an archaebacterium, such asMethanococcus jannaschii, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum,Halobacterium such as Haloferax volcanii and Halobacterium speciesNRC-1, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Pyrococcus furiosus, Pyrococcushorikoshii, Aeuropyrum pernix, Methanococcus maripaludis, Methanopyruskandleri, Methanosarcina mazei, Pyrobaculum aerophilum, Pyrococcusabyssi, Sulfolobus solfataricus, Sulfolobus tokodaii, Thermoplasmaacidophilum, Thermoplasma volcanium, or the like, or a eubacterium, suchas Escherichia coli, Thermus thermophilus, Bacillus stearothermphilus,or the like. In one embodiment, eukaryotic sources, e.g., plants, algae,protists, fungi, yeasts, animals (e.g., mammals, insects, arthropods,etc.), or the like, can also be used as sources of O-tRNAs and O-RSs.

The individual components of an O-tRNA/O-RS pair can be derived from thesame organism or different organisms. In one embodiment, the O-tRNA/O-RSpair is from the same organism. Alternatively, the O-tRNA and the O-RSof the O-tRNA/O-RS pair are from different organisms. In one preferredexample embodiment, the lysyl synthetase/tRNA pair of the archaenPyrococcus horikoshii is used as an orthogonal pair, e.g., in an E.coli-based translation system. As described herein, this pair can bemodified to recognize a four base selector codon and can be modified tocharge the O-tRNA with an unnatural amino acid such as homoglutamine.This orthogonal pair (or modified forms thereof) can also be combinedwith previously described orthogonal pairs, e.g., those derived fromMethanococcus jannaschii, e.g., that are modified to recognize stopselector codons. This provides for production of proteins that comprisetwo different unnatural amino acids in a translation system of interestby including a coding nucleic acid for such proteins that include two ormore slector codons that are each recognized by an O-tRNA/O-RS pair.

The O-tRNA, O-RS or O-tRNA/O-RS pair can be selected or screened in vivoor in vitro and/or used in a cell, e.g., a non-eukaryotic cells, oreukaryotic cells, to produce a polypeptide with a homoglutamine or otherunnatural amino acid of interest. A non-eukaryotic cell can be from anyof a variety of sources, e.g., a eubacterium, such as Escherichia coli,Thermus thermophilus, Bacillus stearothermphilus, or the like, or anarchaebacterium, such as Methanococcus jannaschii, Methanobacteriumthermoautotrophicum, Halobacterium such as Haloferax volcanii andHalobacterium species NRC-1, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Pyrococcusfuriosus, Pyrococcus horikoshii, Aeuropyrum pernix, Methanococcusmaripaludis, Methanopyrus kandleri, Methanosarcina mazei (Mm),Pyrobaculum aerophilum, Pyrococcus abyssi, Sulfolobus solfataricus (Ss),Sulfolobus tokodaii, Thermoplasma acidophilum, Thermoplasma volcanium,or the like. A eukaryotic cell can be from any of a variety of sources,e.g., a plant (e.g., complex plant such as monocots, or dicots), analgae, a protist, a fungus, a yeast (e.g., Saccharomyces cerevisiae), ananimal (e.g., a mammal, an insect, an arthropod, etc.), or the like.Compositions of cells with translational components of the invention arealso a feature of the invention.

See also, International Application Number PCT/US2004/011786, filed Apr.16, 2004, for screening O-tRNA and/or O-RS in one species for use inanother species.

Selector Codons

Selector codons of the invention expand the genetic codon framework ofthe protein biosynthetic machinery. For example, a selector codonincludes, e.g., a unique three base codon, a nonsense codon, such as astop codon, e.g., an amber codon (UAG), or an opal codon (UGA), anunnatural codon, at least a four base codon (e.g., AGGA), a rare codon,or the like. A number of selector codons can be introduced into adesired gene, e.g., one or more, two or more, more than three, etc. Byusing different selector codons, multiple orthogonal tRNA/synthetasepairs can be used that allow the simultaneous site-specificincorporation of multiple different unnatural amino acids, using thesedifferent selector codons.

In one embodiment, the methods involve the use of a selector codon thatis a stop codon for the incorporation of a homoglutamine in vivo in acell. For example, an O-tRNA is produced that recognizes a four baseselector codon and is aminoacylated by an O-RS with a homoglutamine.This O-tRNA is not recognized by the translation system's endogenousaminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Conventional site-directed mutagenesis canbe used to introduce the selector codon at the site of interest in atarget polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide of interest. See also,e.g., Sayers, J. R., et al. (1988), “5′,3′ Exonuclease inphosphorothioate-based oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis.” NucleicAcids Res, 791-802. When the O-RS, O-tRNA and the nucleic acid thatencodes a polypeptide of interest are combined, e.g., in vivo, thehomoglutamine is incorporated in response to the selector codon to givea polypeptide containing the homoglutamine at the specified position.

The incorporation of unnatural amino acids such as homoglutamine, invivo, can be done without significant perturbation of the host cell. Forexample, in non-eukaryotic cells, such as Escherichia coli, because thesuppression efficiency of a stop selector codon, the UAG codon, dependsupon the competition between the O-tRNA, e.g., the amber suppressortRNA, and release factor 1 (RF1) (which binds to the UAG codon andinitiates release of the growing peptide from the ribosome), thesuppression efficiency can be modulated by, e.g., either increasing theexpression level of O-tRNA, e.g., the suppressor tRNA, or using an RF1deficient strain. In eukaryotic cells, because the suppressionefficiency for a UAG codon depends upon the competition between theO-tRNA, e.g., the amber suppressor tRNA, and a eukaryotic release factor(e.g., eRF) (which binds to a stop codon and initiates release of thegrowing peptide from the ribosome), the suppression efficiency can bemodulated by, e.g., increasing the expression level of O-tRNA, e.g., thesuppressor tRNA. In addition, additional compounds can also be presentthat modulate release factor action, e.g., reducing agents such asdithiothretiol (DTT).

Unnatural amino acids, including, e.g., homoglutamines can also beencoded with rare codons. For example, when the arginine concentrationin an in vitro protein synthesis reaction is reduced, the rare argininecodon, AGG, has proven to be efficient for insertion of Ala by asynthetic tRNA acylated with alanine. See, e.g., Ma et al.,Biochemistry, 32:7939 (1993). In this case, the synthetic tRNA competeswith the naturally occurring tRNA_(Arg), which exists as a minor speciesin Escherichia coli. In addition, some organisms do not use all tripletcodons. An unassigned codon AGA in Micrococcus luteus has been utilizedfor insertion of amino acids in an in vitro transcription/translationextract. See, e.g., Kowal and Oliver, Nucl. Acid. Res. 25:4685 (1997).Components of the invention can be generated to use these rare codons invivo.

Selector codons can also comprise extended codons, e.g., four or morebase codons, such as, four, five, six or more base codons. Examples offour base codons include, e.g., AGGA, CUAG, UAGA, CCCU, and the like.Examples of five base codons include, e.g., AGGAC, CCCCU, CCCUC, CUAGA,CUACU, UAGGC, and the like. Methods of the invention include usingextended codons based on frameshift suppression. Four or more basecodons can insert, e.g., one or multiple unnatural amino acids, such asa homoglutamine, into the same protein. In other embodiments, theanticodon loops can decode, e.g., at least a four-base codon, at least afive-base codon, or at least a six-base codon or more. Since there are256 possible four-base codons, multiple unnatural amino acids can beencoded in the same cell using a four or more base codon. See also,Anderson et al., (2002) Exploring the Limits of Codon and AnticodonSize, Chemistry and Biology, 9:237-244; and, Magliery, (2001) Expandingthe Genetic Code: Selection of Efficient Suppressors of Four-base Codonsand Identification of “Shifty” Four-base Codons with a Library Approachin Escherichia coli, J. Mol. Biol. 307: 755-769.

For example, four-base codons have been used to incorporate unnaturalamino acids into proteins using in vitro biosynthetic methods. See,e.g., Ma et al., (1993) Biochemistry, 32:7939; and Hohsaka et al.,(1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121:34. CGGG and AGGU were used tosimultaneously incorporate 2-naphthylalanine and an NBD derivative oflysine into streptavidin in vitro with two chemically acylatedframeshift suppressor tRNAs. See, e.g., Hohsaka et al., (1999) J. Am.Chem. Soc., 121:12194. In an in vivo study, Moore et al. examined theability of tRNA^(Leu) derivatives with NCUA anticodons to suppress UAGNcodons (N can be U, A, G, or C), and found that the quadruplet UAGA canbe decoded by a tRNA^(Leu) with a UCUA anticodon with an efficiency of13 to 26% with little decoding in the 0 or −1 frame. See Moore et al.,(2000) J. Mol. Biol. 298:195. In one embodiment, extended codons basedon rare codons or nonsense codons can be used in invention, which canreduce missense readthrough and frameshift suppression at other unwantedsites. In the examples herein, an orthogonal pair that recognizes anAGGA selector codon and that inserts a homoglutamine during proteintranslation is described.

For a given system, a selector codon can also include one of the naturalthree base codons, where the endogenous system does not use (or rarelyuses) the natural base codon. For example, this includes a system thatis lacking a tRNA that recognizes the natural three base codon, and/or asystem where the three base codon is a rare codon.

Selector codons optionally include unnatural base pairs. These unnaturalbase pairs further expand the existing genetic alphabet. One extra basepair increases the number of triplet codons from 64 to 125. Propertiesof third base pairs include stable and selective base pairing, efficientenzymatic incorporation into DNA with high fidelity by a polymerase, andthe efficient continued primer extension after synthesis of the nascentunnatural base pair. Descriptions of unnatural base pairs which can beadapted for methods and compositions include, e.g., Hirao, et al.,(2002) An unnatural base pair for incorporating amino acid analoguesinto protein, Nature Biotechnology, 20:177-182. See also Wu, Y., et al.,(2002) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:14626-14630. Other relevant publicationsare listed below.

For in vivo usage, the unnatural nucleoside is membrane permeable and isphosphorylated to form the corresponding triphosphate. In addition, theincreased genetic information is stable and not destroyed by cellularenzymes. Previous efforts by Benner and others took advantage ofhydrogen bonding patterns that are different from those in canonicalWatson-Crick pairs, the most noteworthy example of which is theiso-C:iso-G pair. See, e.g., Switzer et al., (1989) J. Am. Chem. Soc.,111:8322; and Piccirilli et al., (1990) Nature, 343:33; Kool, (2000)Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4:602. These bases in general mispair to somedegree with natural bases and cannot be enzymatically replicated. Kooland co-workers demonstrated that hydrophobic packing interactionsbetween bases can replace hydrogen bonding to drive the formation ofbase pair. See Kool, (2000) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4:602; and Guckianand Kool, (1998) Anzew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 36, 2825. In an effort todevelop an unnatural base pair satisfying all the above requirements,Schultz, Romesberg and co-workers have systematically synthesized andstudied a series of unnatural hydrophobic bases. A PI

S:PICS self-pair is found to be more stable than natural base pairs, andcan be efficiently incorporated into DNA by Klenow fragment ofEscherichia coli DNA polymerase I (KF). See, e.g., McMinn et al., (1999)J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121:11586; and Ogawa et al., (2000) J. Am. Chem.Soc., 122:3274. A 3MN:3MN self-pair can be synthesized by KF withefficiency and selectivity sufficient for biological function. See,e.g., Ogawa et al., (2000) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:8803. However, bothbases act as a chain terminator for further replication. A mutant DNApolymerase has been recently evolved that can be used to replicate thePICS self pair. In addition, a 7AI self pair can be replicated. See,e.g., Tae et al., (2001) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123:7439. A novelmetallobase pair, Dipic:Py, has also been developed, which forms astable pair upon binding Cu(II). See Meggers et al., (2000) J. Am. Chem.Soc. 122:10714. Because extended codons and unnatural codons areintrinsically orthogonal to natural codons, the methods of the inventioncan take advantage of this property to generate orthogonal tRNAs forthem.

A translational bypassing system can also be used to incorporate ahomoglutamine or other unnatural amino acid into a desired polypeptide.In a translational bypassing system, a large sequence is inserted into agene but is not translated into protein. The sequence contains astructure that serves as a cue to induce the ribosome to hop over thesequence and resume translation downstream of the insertion.

Unnatural Amino Acids

As used herein, an unnatural amino acid refers to any amino acid,modified amino acid, or amino acid analogue other than selenocysteineand/or pyrrolysine and the following twenty genetically encodedalpha-amino acids: alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid,cysteine, glutamine, glutamic acid, glycine, histidine, isoleucine,leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine,tryptophan, tyrosine, valine. The generic structure of an alpha-aminoacid is illustrated by Formula I:

An unnatural amino acid is typically any structure having Formula Iwherein the R group is any substituent other than one used in the twentynatural amino acids. See e.g., Biochemistry by L. Stryer, 3^(rd) ed.1988, Freeman and Company, New York, for structures of the twentynatural amino acids. Note that, the unnatural amino acids of theinvention can be naturally occurring compounds other than the twentyalpha-amino acids above (or, of course, artificially produced syntheticcompounds).

Because the unnatural amino acids of the invention typically differ fromthe natural amino acids in side chain, the unnatural amino acids formamide bonds with other amino acids, e.g., natural or unnatural, in thesame manner in which they are formed in naturally occurring proteins.However, the unnatural amino acids have side chain groups thatdistinguish them from the natural amino acids.

Of particular interest in incorporating unnatural amino acids intoproteins it to have the ability to incorporate a homoglutamine. In otherunnatural amino acids, for example, R in Formula I optionally comprisesan alkyl-, aryl-, acyl-, keto-, azido-, hydroxyl-, hydrazine, cyano-,halo-, hydrazide, alkenyl, alkynyl, ether, thiol, seleno-, sulfonyl-,borate, boronate, phospho, phosphono, phosphine, heterocyclic, enone,imine, aldehyde, ester, thioacid, hydroxylamine, amine, and the like, orany combination thereof. Other unnatural amino acids of interestinclude, but are not limited to, amino acids comprising aphotoactivatable cross-linker, spin-labeled amino acids, fluorescentamino acids, metal binding amino acids, metal-containing amino acids,radioactive-amino acids, amino acids with novel functional groups, aminoacids that covalently or noncovalently interact with other molecules,photocaged and/or photoisomerizable amino acids, biotin orbiotin-analogue containing amino acids, keto containing amino acids,glycosylated amino acids, amino acids comprising polyethylene glycol orpolyether, heavy atom substituted amino acids, chemically cleavable orphotocleavable amino acids, amino acids with an elongated side chain ascompared to natural amino acids (e.g., polyethers or long chainhydrocarbons, e.g., greater than about 5, greater than about 10 carbons,etc.), carbon-linked sugar-containing amino acids, redox-active aminoacids, amino thioacid containing amino acids, and amino acids containingone or more toxic moiety. In some embodiments, the unnatural amino acidshave a photoactivatable cross-linker. In one embodiment, the unnaturalamino acids have a saccharide moiety attached to the amino acid sidechain and/or other carbohydrate modification.

In addition to unnatural amino acids that contain novel side chains,unnatural amino acids also optionally comprise modified backbonestructures, e.g., as illustrated by the structures of Formula II andIII:

wherein Z typically comprises OH, NH₂, SH, NH—R′, or S—R′; X and Y,which can be the same or different, typically comprise S or O, and R andR′, which are optionally the same or different, are typically selectedfrom the same list of constituents for the R group described above forthe unnatural amino acids having Formula I as well as hydrogen. Forexample, unnatural amino acids of the invention optionally comprisesubstitutions in the amino or carboxyl group as illustrated by FormulasII and m. Unnatural amino acids of this type include, but are notlimited to, α-hydroxy acids, α-thioacids α-aminothiocarboxylates, e.g.,with side chains corresponding to the common twenty natural amino acidsor unnatural side chains. In addition, substitutions at the α-carbonoptionally include L, D, or α-α-disubstituted amino acids such asD-glutamate, D-alanine, D-methyl-O-tyrosine, aminobutyric acid, and thelike. Other structural alternatives include cyclic amino acids, such asproline analogues as well as 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 membered ring prolineanalogues, β and γ amino acids such as substituted β-alanine and γ-aminobutyric acid. Additional unnatural amino acid structures of theinvention include homo-beta-type structures, e.g., where there is, e.g.,a methylene or amino group sandwiched adjacent to the alpha carbon,e.g., isomers of homo-beta-tyrosine, alpha-hydrazino-tyrosine. See,e.g.,

Many unnatural amino acids are based on natural amino acids, such astyrosine, glutamine, phenylalanine, and the like. For example, tyrosineanalogs include para-substituted tyrosines, ortho-substituted tyrosines,and meta substituted tyrosines, wherein the substituted tyrosinecomprises an acetyl group, a benzoyl group, an amino group, a hydrazine,an hydroxyamine, a thiol group, a carboxy group, an isopropyl group, amethyl group, a C₆-C₂₀ straight chain or branched hydrocarbon, asaturated or unsaturated hydrocarbon, an O-methyl group, a polyethergroup, a nitro group, or the like. In addition, multiply substitutedaryl rings are also contemplated. Glutamine analogs of the inventioninclude, but are not limited to, α-hydroxy derivatives, γ-substitutedderivatives, cyclic derivatives, and amide substituted glutaminederivatives. Example phenylalanine analogs include, but are not limitedto, para-substituted phenylalanines, ortho-substituted phenyalanines,and meta-substituted phenylalanines, wherein the substituent comprises ahydroxy group, a methoxy group, a methyl group, an allyl group, analdehyde or keto group, or the like. Specific examples of unnaturalamino acids include, but are not limited to, homoglutamine, a3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine, a p-acetyl-L-phenylalanine, ap-propargyloxyphenylalanine, O-methyl-L-tyrosine, anL-3-(2-naphthyl)alanine, a 3-methyl-phenylalanine, anO-4-allyl-L-tyrosine, a 4-propyl-L-tyrosine, atri-O-acetyl-GlcNAcβ-serine, an L-Dopa, a fluorinated phenylalanine, anisopropyl-L-phenylalanine, a p-azido-L-phenylalanine, ap-acyl-L-phenylalanine, a p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine, an L-phosphoserine,a phosphonoserine, a phosphonotyrosine, a p-iodo-phenylalanine, ap-bromophenylalanine, a p-amino-L-phenylalanine, and anisopropyl-L-phenylalanine, and the like. The structures of a variety ofunnatural amino acids are provided in, for example, FIGS. 16, 17, 18,19, 26, and 29 of WO 2002/085923 entitled “In vivo incorporation ofunnatural amino acids.”

Chemical Synthesis of Unnatural Amino Acids

Many of the unnatural amino acids provided above are commerciallyavailable, e.g., from Sigma (USA) or Aldrich (Milwaukee, Wis., USA).Those that are not commercially available are optionally synthesized asprovided in various publications or using standard methods known tothose of skill in the art. For organic synthesis techniques, see, e.g.,Organic Chemistry by Fessendon and Fessendon, (1982, Second Edition,Willard Grant Press, Boston Mass.); Advanced Organic Chemistry by March(Third Edition, 1985, Wiley and Sons, New York); and Advanced OrganicChemistry by Carey and Sundberg Third Edition, Parts A and B, 1990,Plenum Press, New York). Additional publications describing thesynthesis of unnatural amino acids include, e.g., WO 2002/085923entitled “In vivo incorporation of Unnatural Amino Acids;” Matsoukas etal., (1995) J. Med. Chem., 38, 4660-4669; King, F. E. & Kidd, D. A. A.(1949) A New Synthesis of Glutamine and of Dipeptides of Glutamic Acidfrom Phthylated Intermediates. J. Chem. Soc., 3315-3319; Friedman, O. M.& Chattenji, R. (1959) Synthesis of Derivatives of Glutamine as ModelSubstrates for Anti-Tumor Agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 3750-3752;Craig, J. C. et al. (1988) Absolute Configuration of the Enantiomers of7-Chloro-4[[4-(diethylamino)-1-methylbutyl]amino]quinoline(Chloroquine). J. Org. Chem. 53, 1167-1170; Azoulay, M., Vilmont, M. &Frappier, F. (1991) Glutamine analogues as Potential Antimalarials, Eur.J. Med. Chem. 26, 201-5; Koskinen, A. M. P. & Rapoport, H. (1989)Synthesis of 4-Substituted Prolines as Conformationally ConstrainedAmino Acid Analogues. J. Org. Chem. 54, 1859-1866; Christie, B. D. &Rapoport, H. (1985) Synthesis of Optically Pure Pipecolates fromL-Asparagine. Application to the Total Synthesis of (+)-Apovincaminethrough Amino Acid Decarbonylation and Iminium Ion Cyclization. J. Org.Chem. 1989:1859-1866; Barton et al., (1987) Synthesis of Novelα-Amino-Acids and Derivatives Using Radical Chemistry: Synthesis ofL-and D-α-Amino-Adipic Acids, L-α-aminopimelic Acid and AppropriateUnsaturated Derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 43:4297-4308; and, Subasingheet al., (1992) Quisqualic acid analogues: synthesis of beta-heterocyclic2-aminopropanoic acid derivatives and their activity at a novelquisqualate-sensitized site. J. Med. Chem. 35:4602-7. See alsoInternational Application Number PCT/US03/41346, entitled “ProteinArrays,” filed on Dec. 22, 2003.

Cellular Uptake of Unnatural Amino Acids

Unnatural amino acid uptake by a cell is one issue that is typicallyconsidered when designing and selecting unnatural amino acids, e.g., forincorporation into a protein. For example, the high charge density ofα-amino acids suggests that these compounds are unlikely to be cellpermeable. Natural amino acids are taken up into the cell via acollection of protein-based transport systems often displaying varyingdegrees of amino acid specificity. A rapid screen can be done whichassesses which unnatural amino acids, if any, are taken up by cells.See, e.g., toxicity assays in, e.g., International Application NumberPCT/US03/41346, entitled “Protein Arrays,” filed on Dec. 22, 2003; andLu, D. R. & Schultz, P. G. (1999) Progress toward the evolution of anorganism with an expanded genetic code. PNAS United States 96:4780-4785.Although uptake is easily analyzed with various assays, an alternativeto designing unnatural amino acids that are amenable to cellular uptakepathways is to provide biosynthetic pathways to create amino acids invivo.

Biosynthesis of Unnatural Amino Acids

Many biosynthetic pathways already exist in cells for the production ofamino acids and other compounds. While a biosynthetic method for aparticular unnatural amino acid may not exist in nature, e.g., in acell, the invention provides such methods. For example, biosyntheticpathways for unnatural amino acids are optionally generated in host cellby adding new enzymes or modifying existing host cell pathways.Additional new enzymes are optionally naturally occurring enzymes orartificially evolved enzymes. For example, the biosynthesis ofp-aminophenylalanine (as presented in an example in WO 2002/085923,supra) relies on the addition of a combination of known enzymes fromother organisms. The genes for these enzymes can be introduced into acell by transforming the cell with a plasmid comprising the genes. Thegenes, when expressed in the cell, provide an enzymatic pathway tosynthesize the desired compound. Examples of the types of enzymes thatare optionally added are provided in the examples below. Additionalenzymes sequences are found, e.g., in Genbank. Artificially evolvedenzymes are also optionally added into a cell in the same manner. Inthis manner, the cellular machinery and resources of a cell aremanipulated to produce unnatural amino acids.

Indeed, any of a variety of methods can be used for producing novelenzymes for use in biosynthetic pathways, or for evolution of existingpathways, for the production of unnatural amino acids, in vitro or invivo. Many available methods of evolving enzymes and other biosyntheticpathway components can be applied to the present invention to produceunnatural amino acids (or, indeed, to evolve synthetases to have newsubstrate specificities or other activities of interest). For example,DNA shuffling is optionally used to develop novel enzymes and/orpathways of such enzymes for the production of unnatural amino acids (orproduction of new synthetases), in vitro or in vivo. See, e.g., Stemmer(1994), Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling, Nature370(4):389-391; and, Stemmer, (1994), DNA shuffling by randomfragmentation and reassembly: In vitro recombination for molecularevolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 91:10747-10751. A relatedapproach shuffles families of related (e.g., homologous) genes toquickly evolve enzymes with desired characteristics. An example of such“family gene shuffling” methods is found in Crameri et al. (1998) “DNAshuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directedevolution” Nature, 391(6664): 288-291. New enzymes (whether biosyntheticpathway components or synthetases) can also be generated using a DNArecombination procedure known as “incremental truncation for thecreation of hybrid enzymes” (“ITCHY”), e.g., as described in Ostermeieret al. (1999) “A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent ofDNA homology” Nature Biotech 17:1205. This approach can also be used togenerate a library of enzyme or other pathway variants which can serveas substrates for one or more in vitro or in vivo recombination methods.See, also, Ostermeier et al. (1999) “Combinatorial Protein Engineeringby Incremental Truncation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 3562-67, andOstermeier et al. (1999), “Incremental Truncation as a Strategy in theEngineering of Novel Biocatalysts,” Biological and Medicinal Chemistry,7: 2139-44. Another approach uses exponential ensemble mutagenesis toproduce libraries of enzyme or other pathway variants that are, e.g.,selected for an ability to catalyze a biosynthetic reaction relevant toproducing an unnatural amino acid (or a new synthetase). In thisapproach, small groups of residues in a sequence of interest arerandomized in parallel to identify, at each altered position, aminoacids which lead to functional proteins. Examples of such procedures,which can be adapted to the present invention to produce new enzymes forthe production of unnatural amino acids (or new synthetases) are foundin Delegrave & Youvan (1993) Biotechnology Research 11: 1548-1552. Inyet another approach, random or semi-random mutagenesis using doped ordegenerate oligonucleotides for enzyme and/or pathway componentengineering can be used, e.g., by using the general mutagenesis methodsof e.g., Arkin and Youvan (1992) “Optimizing nucleotide mixtures toencode specific subsets of amino acids for semi-random mutagenesis”Biotechnology 10:297-300; or Reidhaar-Olson et al. (1991) “Randommutagenesis of protein sequences using oligonucleotide cassettes”Methods Enzymol. 208:564-86. Yet another-approach, often termed a“non-stochastic” mutagenesis, which uses polynucleotide reassembly andsite-saturation mutagenesis can be used to produce enzymes and/orpathway components, which can then be screened for an ability to performone or more synthetase or biosynthetic pathway function (e.g., for theproduction of unnatural amino acids in vivo). See, e.g., Short“Non-Stochastic Generation of Genetic Vaccines and Enzymes” WO 00/46344.

An alternative to such mutational methods involves recombining entiregenomes of organisms and selecting resulting progeny for particularpathway functions (often referred to as “whole genome shuffling”). Thisapproach can be applied to the present invention, e.g., by genomicrecombination and selection of an organism (e.g., an E. coli or othercell) for an ability to produce an unnatural amino acid (or intermediatethereof). For example, methods taught in the following publications canbe applied to pathway design for the evolution of existing and/or newpathways in cells to produce unnatural amino acids in vivo: Patnaik etal. (2002) “Genome shuffling of lactobacillus for improved acidtolerance” Nature Biotechnology, 20(7): 707-712; and Zhang et al. (2002)“Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria”Nature, February 7, 415(6872): 644-646.

Other techniques for organism and metabolic pathway engineering, e.g.,for the production of desired compounds are also available and can alsobe applied to the production of unnatural amino acids. Examples ofpublications teaching useful pathway engineering approaches include:Nakamura and White (2003) “Metabolic engineering for the microbialproduction of 1,3 propanediol” Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14(5):454-9;Berry et al. (2002) “Application of Metabolic Engineering to improveboth the production and use of Biotech Indigo” J. IndustrialMicrobiology and Biotechnology 28:127-133; Banta et al. (2002)“Optimizing an artificial metabolic pathway: Engineering the cofactorspecificity of Corynebacterium 2,5-diketo-D-gluconic acid reductase foruse in vitamin C biosynthesis” Biochemistry, 41(20), 6226-36; Selivonovaet al. (2001) “Rapid Evolution of Novel Traits in Microorganisms”Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67:3645, and many others.

Regardless of the method used, typically, the unnatural amino acidproduced with an engineered biosynthetic pathway of the invention isproduced in a concentration sufficient for efficient proteinbiosynthesis, e.g., a natural cellular amount, but not to such a degreeas to significantly affect the concentration of other cellular aminoacids or to exhaust cellular resources. Typical concentrations producedin vivo in this manner are about 10 mM to about 0.05 mM. Once a cell isengineered to produce enzymes desired for a specific pathway and anunnatural amino acid is generated, in vivo selections are optionallyused to further optimize the production of the unnatural amino acid forboth ribosomal protein synthesis and cell growth.

Orthogonal Components for Incorporating Homoglutamine

The invention provides compositions and methods of producing orthogonalcomponents for incorporating a homoglutamine into a growing polypeptidechain in response to a selector codon, e.g., stop codon, a nonsensecodon, a four or more base codon, etc., e.g., in vivo. For example, theinvention provides orthogonal-tRNAs (O-tRNAs), orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetases (O-RSs) and pairs thereof. These pairs can be used toincorporate homoglutamines into growing polypeptide chains.

A composition of the invention includes an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetase (O-RS), where the O-RS preferentially aminoacylates an O-tRNAwith a homoglutamine. In certain embodiments, the O-RS comprises anamino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO.: 1, or a conservativevariation thereof. In certain embodiments of the invention, the O-RSpreferentially aminoacylates the O-tRNA with an efficiency of at least50% of the efficiency of a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequenceof SEQ ID NO.: 1.

A composition that includes an O-RS can optionally further include anorthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA), where the O-tRNA recognizes a selector codon.Typically, an O-tRNA of the invention includes at least about, e.g., a45%, a 50%, a 60%, a 75%, a 80%, or a 90% or more suppression efficiencyin the presence of a cognate synthetase in response to a selector codonas compared to the O-tRNA comprising or encoded by a polynucleotidesequence as set forth in the sequence listings and examples herein. Inone embodiment, the suppression efficiency of the O-RS and the O-tRNAtogether is, e.g., 5 fold, 10 fold, 15 fold, 20 fold, 25 fold or moregreater than the suppression efficiency of the O-tRNA lacking the O-RS.In one aspect, the suppression efficiency of the O-RS and the O-tRNAtogether is at least 45% of the suppression efficiency of an orthogonaltyrosyl-tRNA synthetase pair derived from Methanococcus jannaschii.

A composition that includes an O-tRNA can optionally include a cell(e.g., a non-eukaryotic cell, such as an E. coli cell and the like, or aeukaryotic cell), and/or a translation system.

A cell (e.g., a non-eukaryotic cell, or a eukaryotic cell) comprising atranslation system is also provided by the invention, where thetranslation system includes an orthogonal-tRNA (O-tRNA); an orthogonalaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (O-RS); and, a homoglutamine. Typically, theO-RS preferentially aminoacylates the O-tRNA with an efficiency of atleast 50% of the efficiency of a polypeptide comprising an amino acidsequence of SEQ ID NO.: 1. The O-tRNA recognizes the first selectorcodon, and the O-RS preferentially aminoacylates the O-tRNA with thehomoglutamine. In one embodiment, the O-tRNA comprises or is encoded bya polynucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO.: 2, or acomplementary polynucleotide sequence thereof. In one embodiment, theO-RS comprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in any one of SEQ IDNO.: 1, or a conservative variation thereof.

A cell of the invention can optionally further comprise an additionaldifferent O-tRNA/O-RS pair and a second unnatural amino acid, e.g.,where this O-tRNA recognizes a second selector codon and this O-RSpreferentially aminoacylates the O-tRNA with the second unnatural aminoacid amino acid. Optionally, a cell of the invention includes a nucleicacid that comprises a polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide ofinterest, where the polynucleotide comprises a selector codon that isrecognized by the O-tRNA.

In certain embodiments, a cell of the invention includes an E. coli cellthat includes an orthogonal-tRNA (O-tRNA), an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetase (O-RS), a homoglutamine, and a nucleic acid that comprises apolynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide of interest, where thepolynucleotide comprises the selector codon that is recognized by theO-tRNA. In certain embodiments of the invention, the O-RS preferentiallyaminoacylates the O-tRNA with an efficiency of at least 50% of theefficiency of a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence of anylisted O-RS sequence herein.

In certain embodiments of the invention, an O-tRNA of the inventioncomprises or is encoded by a polynucleotide sequence as set forth in thesequence listings or examples herein, or a complementary polynucleotidesequence thereof. In certain embodiments of the invention, an O-RScomprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in the sequence listings,or a conservative variation thereof. In one embodiment, the O-RS or aportion thereof is encoded by a polynucleotide sequence encoding anamino acid as set forth in the sequence listings or examples herein, ora complementary polynucleotide sequence thereof.

The O-tRNA and/or the O-RS of the invention can be derived from any of avariety of organisms (e.g., eukaryotic and/or non-eukaryotic organisms).

Polynucleotides are also a feature of the invention. A polynucleotide ofthe invention includes an artificial (e.g., man-made, and not naturallyoccurring) polynucleotide comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding apolypeptide as set forth in the sequence listings herein, and/or iscomplementary to or that polynucleotide sequence. A polynucleotide ofthe invention can also includes a nucleic acid that hybridizes to apolynucleotide described above, under highly stringent conditions, oversubstantially the entire length of the nucleic acid. A polynucleotide ofthe invention also includes a polynucleotide that is, e.g., at least75%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or moreidentical to that of a naturally occurring tRNA or corresponding codingnucleic acid (but a polynucleotide of the invention is other than anaturally occurring tRNA or corresponding coding nucleic acid), wherethe tRNA recognizes a selector codon, e.g., a four base codon.Artificial polynucleotides that are, e.g., at least 80%, at least 90%,at least 95%, at least 98% or more identical to any of the above and/ora polynucleotide comprising a conservative variation of any the above,are also included in polynucleotides of the invention.

Vectors comprising a polynucleotide of the invention are also a featureof the invention. For example, a vector of the invention can include aplasmid, a cosmid, a phage, a virus, an expression vector, and/or thelike. A cell comprising a vector of the invention is also a feature ofthe invention.

Methods of producing components of an O-tRNA/O-RS pair are also featuresof the invention. Components produced by these methods are also afeature of the invention. For example, methods of producing at least onetRNA that are orthogonal to a cell (O-tRNA) include generating a libraryof mutant tRNAs; mutating an anticodon loop of each member of thelibrary of mutant tRNAs to allow recognition of a selector codon,thereby providing a library of potential O-tRNAs, and subjecting tonegative selection a first population of cells of a first species, wherethe cells comprise a member of the library of potential O-tRNAs. Thenegative selection eliminates cells that comprise a member of thelibrary of potential O-tRNAs that is aminoacylated by an aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetase (RS) that is endogenous to the cell. This provides a pool oftRNAs that are orthogonal to the cell of the first species, therebyproviding at least one O-tRNA. An O-tRNA produced by the methods of theinvention is also provided.

In certain embodiments, the methods further comprise subjecting topositive selection a second population of cells of the first species,where the cells comprise a member of the pool of tRNAs that areorthogonal to the cell of the first species, a cognate aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetase, and a positive selection marker. Using the positiveselection, cells are selected or screened for those cells that comprisea member of the pool of tRNAs that is aminoacylated by the cognateaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and that shows a desired response in thepresence of the positive selection marker, thereby providing an O-tRNA.In certain embodiments, the second population of cells comprise cellsthat were not eliminated by the negative selection.

Methods for identifying an orthogonal-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase thatcharges a homoglutamine onto an O-tRNA are also provided. For example,methods include subjecting to selection a population of cells of a firstspecies, where the cells each comprise: 1) a member of a plurality ofaminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (RSs), (e.g., the plurality of RSs caninclude mutant RSs, RSs derived from a species other than a firstspecies or both mutant RSs and RSs derived from a species other than afirst species); 2) the orthogonal-tRNA (O-tRNA) (e.g., from one or morespecies); and 3) a polynucleotide that encodes a positive selectionmarker and comprises at least one selector codon.

Cells (e.g., a host cell) are selected or screened for those that showan enhancement in suppression efficiency compared to cells lacking orhaving a reduced amount of the member of the plurality of RSs. Theseselected/screened cells comprise an active RS that aminoacylates theO-tRNA. An orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase identified by the methodis also a feature of the invention.

Methods of producing a protein in a cell (e.g., a non-eukaryotic cell,such as an E. coli cell or the like, or a eukaryotic cell) with ahomoglutamine at a specified position are also a feature of theinvention. For example, a method includes growing, in an appropriatemedium, a cell, where the cell comprises a nucleic acid that comprisesat least one selector codon and encodes a protein, providing thehomoglutamine, and incorporating the homoglutamine into the specifiedposition in the protein during translation of the nucleic acid with theat least one selector codon, thereby producing the protein. The cellfurther comprises: an orthogonal-tRNA (O-tRNA) that functions in thecell and recognizes the selector codon; and, an orthogonalaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (O-RS) that preferentially aminoacylates theO-tRNA with the homoglutamine. A protein produced by this method is alsoa feature of the invention.

The invention also provides compositions that include proteins, wherethe proteins comprise, e.g., a homoglutamine. In certain embodiments,the protein comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 75%identical to that of a known protein, e.g., a therapeutic protein, adiagnostic protein, an industrial enzyme, or portion thereof.Optionally, the composition comprises a pharmaceutically acceptablecarrier.

Nucleic Acid and Polypeptide Sequence and Variants

As described above and below, the invention provides for nucleic acidpolynucleotide sequences, e.g., O-tRNAs and O-RSs, and polypeptide aminoacid sequences, e.g., O-RSs, and, e.g., compositions, systems andmethods comprising said sequences. Examples of said sequences, e.g.,O-tRNAs and O-RSs are disclosed herein (see the sequence listings andexamples herein). However, one of skill in the art will appreciate thatthe invention is not limited to those exact sequences, e.g., as in theExamples and listing. One of skill will appreciate that the inventionalso provides, e.g., many related and unrelated sequences with thefunctions described herein, e.g., encoding an appropriate O-tRNA or anO-RS.

The invention provides polypeptides (O-RSs) and polynucleotides, e.g.,O-tRNA, polynucleotides that encode O-RSs or portions thereof,oligonucleotides used to isolate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase clones, etc.Polynucleotides of the invention include those that encode proteins orpolypeptides of interest of the invention with one or more selectorcodon. In addition, polynucleotides of the invention include, e.g., apolynucleotide comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in thesequence listings; a polynucleotide that is complementary to or thatencodes a polynucleotide sequence thereof. A polynucleotide of theinvention also includes a polynucleotide that encodes an amino acidsequence comprising any of those in the sequence listings or examplesherein. A polynucleotide of the invention also includes a polynucleotidethat encodes a polypeptide of the invention. Similarly, an artificialnucleic acid that hybridizes to a polynucleotide indicated above underhighly stringent conditions over substantially the entire length of thenucleic acid (and is other than a naturally polynucleotide) is apolynucleotide of the invention. In one embodiment, a compositionincludes a polypeptide of the invention and an excipient (e.g., buffer,water, pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, etc.). The invention alsoprovides an antibody or antisera specifically immunoreactive with apolypeptide of the invention. An artificial polynucleotide is apolynucleotide that is man made and is not naturally occurring.

A polynucleotide of the invention also includes an artificialpolynucleotide that is, e.g., at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 90%,at least 95%, at least 98% or more identical to that of a naturallyoccurring tRNA, (but is other than a naturally occurring tRNA) or anytRNA or coding nucleic acid thereof in a listing or example herein. Apolynucleotide also includes an artificial polynucleotide that is, e.g.,at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% ormore identical to that of a naturally occurring tRNA.

In certain embodiments, a vector (e.g., a plasmid, a cosmid, a phage, avirus, etc.) comprises a polynucleotide of the invention. In oneembodiment, the vector is an expression vector. In another embodiment,the expression vector includes a promoter operably linked to one or moreof the polynucleotides of the invention. In another embodiment, a cellcomprises a vector that includes a polynucleotide of the invention.

One of skill will also appreciate that many variants of the disclosedsequences are included in the invention. For example, conservativevariations of the disclosed sequences that yield a functionally similarsequence are included in the invention. Variants of the nucleic acidpolynucleotide sequences, wherein the variants hybridize to at least onedisclosed sequence and recognize a selector codon, are considered to beincluded in the invention. Unique subsequences of the sequencesdisclosed herein, as determined by, e.g., standard sequence comparisontechniques, are also included in the invention.

Conservative Variations

Owing to the degeneracy of the genetic code, “silent substitutions”(i.e., substitutions in a nucleic acid sequence which do not result inan alteration in an encoded polypeptide) are an implied feature of everynucleic acid sequence which encodes an amino acid. Similarly,“conservative amino acid substitutions,” in one or a few amino acids inan amino acid sequence are substituted with different amino acids withhighly similar properties, are also readily identified as being highlysimilar to a disclosed construct. Such conservative variations of eachdisclosed sequence are a feature of the present invention.

“Conservative variations” of a particular nucleic acid sequence refersto those nucleic acids which encode identical or essentially identicalamino acid sequences, or, where the nucleic acid does not encode anamino acid sequence, to essentially identical sequences. One of skillwill recognize that individual substitutions, deletions or additionswhich alter, add or delete a single amino acid or a small percentage ofamino acids (typically less than 5%, more typically less than 4%, 2% or1%) in an encoded sequence are “conservatively modified variations”where the alterations result in the deletion of an amino acid, additionof an amino acid, or substitution of an amino acid with a chemicallysimilar amino acid. Thus, “conservative variations” of a listedpolypeptide sequence of the present invention include substitutions of asmall percentage, typically less than 5%, more typically less than 2% or1%, of the amino acids of the polypeptide sequence, with an amino acidof the same conservative substitution group. Finally, the addition ofsequences which do not alter the encoded activity of a nucleic acidmolecule, such as the addition of a non-functional sequence, is aconservative variation of the basic nucleic acid.

Conservative substitution tables providing functionally similar aminoacids are well known in the art, where one amino acid residue issubstituted for another amino acid residue having similar chemicalproperties (e.g., aromatic side chains or positively charged sidechains), and therefore does not substantially change the functionalproperties of the polypeptide molecule. The following sets forth examplegroups that contain natural amino acids of like chemical properties,where substitutions within a group is a “conservative substitution”.Nonpolar and/ Positively Negatively or Aliphatic Polar, Charged ChargedSide Uncharged Aromatic Side Side Chains Side Chains Side Chains ChainsChains Glycine Serine Phenylalanine Lysine Aspartate Alanine ThreonineTyrosine Arginine Glutamate Valine Cysteine Tryptophan Histidine LeucineMethionine Isoleucine Asparagine Proline Glutamine

Nucleic Acid Hybridization

Comparative hybridization can be used to identify nucleic acids of theinvention, such as those in the sequence listings herein, includingconservative variations of nucleic acids of the invention, and thiscomparative hybridization method is a one method of distinguishingnucleic acids of the invention from unrelated nucleic acids. Inaddition, target nucleic acids which hybridize to a nucleic acidrepresented by those of the sequence listing under high, ultra-high andultra-ultra high stringency conditions are a feature of the invention.Examples of such nucleic acids include those with one or a few silent orconservative nucleic acid substitutions as compared to a given nucleicacid sequence.

A test nucleic acid is said to specifically hybridize to a probe nucleicacid when it hybridizes at least ½ as well to the probe as to theperfectly matched complementary target, i.e., with a signal to noiseratio at least ½ as high as hybridization of the probe to the targetunder conditions in which the perfectly matched probe binds to theperfectly matched complementary target with a signal to noise ratio thatis at least about 5×-10× as high as that observed for hybridization toany of the unmatched target nucleic acids.

Nucleic acids “hybridize” when they associate, typically in solution.Nucleic acids hybridize due to a variety of well characterizedphysico-chemical forces, such as hydrogen bonding, solvent exclusion,base stacking and the like. An extensive guide to the hybridization ofnucleic acids is found in Tijssen (1993) Laboratory Techniques inBiochemistry and Molecular Biology—Hybridization with Nucleic AcidProbes part I chapter 2, “Overview of principles of hybridization andthe strategy of nucleic acid probe assays,” (Elsevier, New York), aswell as in Ausubel, supra. Hames and Higgins (1995) Gene Probes 1 IRLPress at Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, (Hames and Higgins 1)and Hames and Higgins (1995) Gene Probes 2 IRL Press at OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, England (Hames and Higgins 2) provide detailson the synthesis, labeling, detection and quantification of DNA and RNA,including oligonucleotides.

An example of stringent hybridization conditions for hybridization ofcomplementary nucleic acids which have more than 100 complementaryresidues on a filter in a Southern or northern blot is 50% formalin with1 mg of heparin at 42° C., with the hybridization being carried outovernight. An example of stringent wash conditions is a 0.2×SSC wash at65° C. for 15 minutes (see, Sambrook, supra for a description of SSCbuffer). Often the high stringency wash is preceded by a low stringencywash to remove background probe signal. An example low stringency washis 2×SSC at 40° C. for 15 minutes. In general, a signal to noise ratioof 5× (or higher) than that observed for an unrelated probe in theparticular hybridization assay indicates detection of a specifichybridization.

“Stringent hybridization wash conditions” in the context of nucleic acidhybridization experiments such as Southern and northern hybridizationsare sequence dependent, and are different under different environmentalparameters. An extensive guide to the hybridization of nucleic acids isfound in Tijssen (1993), supra. and in Hames and Higgins, 1 and 2.Stringent hybridization and wash conditions can easily be determinedempirically for any test nucleic acid. For example, in determiningstringent hybridization and wash conditions, the hybridization and washconditions are gradually increased (e.g., by increasing temperature,decreasing salt concentration, increasing detergent concentration and/orincreasing the concentration of organic solvents such as formalin in thehybridization or wash), until a selected set of criteria are met. Forexample, in highly stringent hybridization and wash conditions, thehybridization and wash conditions are gradually increased until a probebinds to a perfectly matched complementary target with a signal to noiseratio that is at least 5× as high as that observed for hybridization ofthe probe to an unmatched target.

“Very stringent” conditions are selected to be equal to the thermalmelting point (T_(m)) for a particular probe. The T_(m) is thetemperature (under defined ionic strength and pH) at which 50% of thetest sequence hybridizes to a perfectly matched probe. For the purposesof the present invention, generally, “highly stringent” hybridizationand wash conditions are selected to be about 5° C. lower than the T_(m)for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH.

“Ultra high-stringency” hybridization and wash conditions are those inwhich the stringency of hybridization and wash conditions are increaseduntil the signal to noise ratio for binding of the probe to theperfectly matched complementary target nucleic acid is at least 10× ashigh as that observed for hybridization to any of the unmatched targetnucleic acids. A target nucleic acid which hybridizes to a probe undersuch conditions, with a signal to noise ratio of at least ½ that of theperfectly matched complementary target nucleic acid is said to bind tothe probe under ultra-high stringency conditions.

Similarly, even higher levels of stringency can be determined bygradually increasing the hybridization and/or wash conditions of therelevant hybridization assay. For example, those in which the stringencyof hybridization and wash conditions are increased until the signal tonoise ratio for binding of the probe to the perfectly matchedcomplementary target nucleic acid is at least 10×, 20×, 50×, 100×, or500× or more as high as that observed for hybridization to any of theunmatched target nucleic acids. A target nucleic acid which hybridizesto a probe under such conditions, with a signal to noise ratio of atleast ½ that of the perfectly matched complementary target nucleic acidis said to bind to the probe under ultra-ultra-high stringencyconditions.

Nucleic acids which do not hybridize to each other under stringentconditions are still substantially identical if the polypeptides whichthey encode are substantially identical. This occurs, e.g., when a copyof a nucleic acid is created using the maximum codon degeneracypermitted by the genetic code.

Unique Subsequences

In one aspect, the invention provides a nucleic acid that comprises aunique subsequence in a nucleic acid selected from the sequences ofO-tRNAs and O-RSs disclosed herein. The unique subsequence is unique ascompared to a nucleic acid corresponding to any previously known tRNA orRS nucleic acid sequence. Alignment can be performed using, e.g., BLASTset to default parameters. Any unique subsequence is useful, e.g., as aprobe to identify the nucleic acids of the invention.

Similarly, the invention includes a polypeptide which comprises a uniquesubsequence in a polypeptide selected from the sequences of O-RSsdisclosed herein. Here, the unique subsequence is unique as compared toa polypeptide corresponding to any previously known RS sequence.

The invention also provides target nucleic acids which hybridizes understringent conditions to a unique coding oligonucleotide which encodes aunique subsequence in a polypeptide selected from the sequences of O-RSswherein the unique subsequence is unique as compared to a polypeptidecorresponding to any of the control polypeptides (e.g., parentalsequences from which synthetases of the invention were derived, e.g., bymutation). Unique sequences are determined as noted above.

Sequence Comparison, Identity, and Homology

The terms “identical” or percent “identity,” in the context of two ormore nucleic acid or polypeptide sequences, refer to two or moresequences or subsequences that are the same or have a specifiedpercentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same, whencompared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as measured using oneof the sequence comparison algorithms described below (or otheralgorithms available to persons of skill) or by visual inspection.

The phrase “substantially identical,” in the context of two nucleicacids or polypeptides (e.g., DNAs encoding an O-tRNA or O-RS, or theamino acid sequence of an O-RS) refers to two or more sequences orsubsequences that have at least about 60%, about 80%, about 90-95%,about 98%, about 99% or more nucleotide or amino acid residue identity,when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as measured usinga sequence comparison algorithm or by visual inspection. Such“substantially identical” sequences are typically considered to be“homologous,” without reference to actual ancestry. Preferably, the“substantial identity” exists over a region of the sequences that is atleast about 50 residues in length, more preferably over a region of atleast about 100 residues, and most preferably, the sequences aresubstantially identical over at least about 150 residues, or over thefull length of the two sequences to be compared.

Proteins and/or protein sequences are “homologous” when they arederived, naturally or artificially, from a common ancestral protein orprotein sequence. Similarly, nucleic acids and/or nucleic acid sequencesare homologous when they are derived, naturally or artificially, from acommon ancestral nucleic acid or nucleic acid sequence. For example, anynaturally occurring nucleic acid can be modified by any availablemutagenesis method to include one or more selector codon. Whenexpressed, this mutagenized nucleic acid encodes a polypeptidecomprising one or more homoglutamine, e.g. unnatural amino acid. Themutation process can, of course, additionally alter one or more standardcodon, thereby changing one or more standard amino acid in the resultingmutant protein as well. Homology is generally inferred from sequencesimilarity between two or more nucleic acids or proteins (or sequencesthereof). The precise percentage of similarity between sequences that isuseful in establishing homology varies with the nucleic acid and proteinat issue, but as little as 25% sequence similarity is routinely used toestablish homology. Higher levels of sequence similarity, e.g., 30%,40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 99% or more, can also be used toestablish homology. Methods for determining sequence similaritypercentages (e.g., BLASTP and BLASTN using default parameters) aredescribed herein and are generally available.

For sequence comparison and homology determination, typically onesequence acts as a reference sequence to which test sequences arecompared. When using a sequence comparison algorithm, test and referencesequences are input into a computer, subsequence coordinates aredesignated, if necessary, and sequence algorithm program parameters aredesignated. The sequence comparison algorithm then calculates thepercent sequence identity for the test sequence(s) relative to thereference sequence, based on the designated program parameters.

Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted, e.g., bythe local homology algorithm of Smith & Waterman, Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482(1981), by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman & Wunsch, J.Mol. Biol. 48:443 (1970), by the search for similarity method of Pearson& Lipman, Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444 (1988), by computerizedimplementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA inthe Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group, 575Science Dr., Madison, Wis.), or by visual inspection (see generallyAusubel et al., infra).

One example of an algorithm that is suitable for determining percentsequence identity and sequence similarity is the BLAST algorithm, whichis described in Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410 (1990).Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available through theNational Center for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs(HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence,which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score Twhen aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T isreferred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al.,supra). These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiatingsearches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are thenextended in both directions along each sequence for as far as thecumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores arecalculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (rewardscore for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty scorefor mismatching residues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, ascoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension ofthe word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulativealignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achievedvalue; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to theaccumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or theend of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T,and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTNprogram (for nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of11, an expectation (E) of 10, a cutoff of 100, M=5, N=4, and acomparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP programuses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, andthe BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff & Henikoff (1989) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915).

In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the BLASTalgorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity betweentwo sequences (see, e.g., Karlin & Altschul, Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA90:5873-5787 (1993)). One measure of similarity provided by the BLASTalgorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides anindication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide oramino acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, a nucleic acidis considered similar to a reference sequence if the smallest sumprobability in a comparison of the test nucleic acid to the referencenucleic acid is less than about 0.1, more preferably less than about0.01, and most preferably less than about 0.001.

Mutagenesis and Other Molecular Biology Techniques

Polynucleotide and polypeptides of the invention and used in theinvention can be manipulated using molecular biological techniques.General texts which describe molecular biological techniques includeBerger and Kimmel, Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques, Methods inEnzymology volume 152 Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif. (Berger);Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning—A Laboratory Manual (3rd Ed.). Vol.1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 2001(“Sambrook”) and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, F. M. Ausubelet al., eds., Current Protocols, a joint venture between GreenePublishing Associates, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (supplementedthrough 2003) (“Ausubel”)). These texts describe mutagenesis, the use ofvectors, promoters and many other relevant topics related to, e.g., thegeneration of genes that include selector codons for production ofproteins that include homoglutamines, orthogonal tRNAs, orthogonalsynthetases, and pairs thereof.

Various types of mutagenesis are used in the invention, e.g., to mutatetRNA molecules, to produce libraries of tRNAs, to produce libraries ofsynthetases, to insert selector codons that encode a homoglutamine in aprotein or polypeptide of interest. They include but are not limited tosite-directed, random point mutagenesis, homologous recombination, DNAshuffling or other recursive mutagenesis methods, chimeric construction,mutagenesis using uracil containing templates, oligonucleotide-directedmutagenesis, phosphorothioate-modified DNA mutagenesis, mutagenesisusing gapped duplex DNA or the like, or any combination thereof.Additional suitable methods include point mismatch repair, mutagenesisusing repair-deficient host strains, restriction-selection andrestriction-purification, deletion mutagenesis, mutagenesis by totalgene synthesis, double-strand break repair, and the like. Mutagenesis,e.g., involving chimeric constructs, is also included in the presentinvention. In one embodiment, mutagenesis can be guided by knowninformation of the naturally occurring molecule or altered or mutatednaturally occurring molecule, e.g., sequence, sequence comparisons,physical properties, crystal structure or the like.

Host cells are genetically engineered (e.g., transformed, transduced ortransfected) with the polynucleotides of the invention or constructswhich include a polynucleotide of the invention, e.g., a vector of theinvention, which can be, for example, a cloning vector or an expressionvector. For example, the coding regions for the orthogonal tRNA, theorthogonal tRNA synthetase, and the protein to be derivatized areoperably linked to gene expression control elements that are functionalin the desired host cell. Typical vectors contain transcription andtranslation terminators, transcription and translation initiationsequences, and promoters useful for regulation of the expression of theparticular target nucleic acid. The vectors optionally comprise genericexpression cassettes containing at least one independent terminatorsequence, sequences permitting replication of the cassette ineukaryotes, or prokaryotes, or both (e.g., shuttle vectors) andselection markers for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. Vectorsare suitable for replication and/or integration in prokaryotes,eukaryotes, or preferably both. See Giliman & Smith, Gene 8:81 (1979);Roberts, et al., Nature, 328:731 (1987); Schneider, B., et al., ProteinExpr. Purif. 6435:10 (1995); Ausubel, Sambrook, Berger (all supra). Thevector can be, for example, in the form of a plasmid, a bacterium, avirus, a naked polynucleotide, or a conjugated polynucleotide. Thevectors are introduced into cells and/or microorganisms by standardmethods including electroporation (From et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 82, 5824 (1985), infection by viral vectors, high velocity ballisticpenetration by small particles with the nucleic acid either within thematrix of small beads or particles, or on the surface (Klein et al.,Nature 327, 70-73 (1987)), and/or the like.

A catalogue of Bacteria and Bacteriophages useful for cloning isprovided, e.g., by the ATCC, e.g., The ATCC Catalogue of Bacteria andBacteriophage (1996) Gherna et al. (eds) published by the ATCC.Additional basic procedures for sequencing, cloning and other aspects ofmolecular biology and underlying theoretical considerations are alsofound in Sambrook (supra), Ausubel (supra), and in Watson et al. (1992)Recombinant DNA Second Edition Scientific American Books, NY. Inaddition, essentially any nucleic acid (and virtually any labelednucleic acid, whether standard or non-standard) can be custom orstandard ordered from any of a variety of commercial sources, such asthe Midland Certified Reagent Company (Midland, Tex. mcrc.com), TheGreat American Gene Company (Ramona, Calif. available on the World WideWeb at genco.com), ExpressGen Inc. (Chicago, Ill. available on the WorldWide Web at expressgen.com), Operon Technologies Inc. (Alameda, Calif.)and many others.

The engineered host cells can be cultured in conventional nutrient mediamodified as appropriate for such activities as, for example, screeningsteps, activating promoters or selecting transformants. These cells canoptionally be cultured into transgenic organisms. Other usefulreferences, e.g. for cell isolation and culture (e.g., for subsequentnucleic acid isolation) include Freshney (1994) Culture of Animal Cells,a Manual of Basic Technique, third edition, Wiley-Liss, New York and thereferences cited therein; Payne et al. (1992) Plant Cell and TissueCulture in Liquid Systems John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, N.Y.;Gamborg and Phillips (eds) (1995) Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture;Fundamental Methods Springer Lab Manual, Springer-Verlag (BerlinHeidelberg New York) and Atlas and Parks (eds) The Handbook ofMicrobiological Media (1993) CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.

Proteins and Polypeptides of Interest

Proteins or polypeptides of interest, e.g., having at least onehomoglutamine, are a feature of the invention, as are polypeptidescomprising two or more different unnatural amino acids. An excipient(e.g., a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient) can also be present withthe protein. Optionally, a protein of the invention will include apost-translational modification.

Methods of producing a protein in a cell with a homoglutamine or otherunnatural amino acid at a specified position are also a feature of theinvention. For example, a method includes growing, in an appropriatemedium, the cell, where the cell comprises a nucleic acid that comprisesat least one selector codon and encodes a protein; and, providing thehomoglutamine or other unnatural amino acid; where the cell furthercomprises: an orthogonal-tRNA (O-tRNA) that functions in the cell andrecognizes the selector codon; and, an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetase (O-RS) that preferentially aminoacylates the O-tRNA with thehomoglutamine or other unnatural amino acid. In certain embodiments, theO-tRNA comprises at least about, e.g., a 45%, a 50%, a 60%, a 75%, a80%, or a 90% or more suppression efficiency in the presence of acognate synthetase in response to the selector codon as compared to theO-tRNA comprising or encoded by a polynucleotide sequence as set forthin the sequence listing and examples herein. A protein produced by thismethod is also a feature of the invention.

The invention also provides compositions that include proteins, wherethe proteins comprise a homoglutamine. In certain embodiments, theprotein comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 75% identicalto that of a target protein such as a therapeutic protein, a diagnosticprotein, an industrial enzyme, or portion thereof, e.g., differing fromthe target protein by introduction of one or more unnatural amino acidsuch as homoglutamine.

The compositions of the invention and compositions made by the methodsof the invention optionally are present in a cell. The O-tRNA/O-RS pairsor individual components of the invention can then be used in a hostsystem's translation machinery, which results in a homoglutamine beingincorporated into a protein. International Application NumberPCT/US20041011786, filed Apr. 16, 2004, entitled “expanding theEukaryotic Genetic Code;” and, WO 2002/085923, entitled “IN VIVOINCORPORATION OF UNNATURAL AMINO ACIDS” describe this process, and areincorporated herein by reference. For example, when an O-tRNA/O-RS pairis introduced into a host, e.g., Escherichia coli, the pair leads to thein vivo incorporation of homoglutamine, e.g., a synthetic amino acid,such as derivative of a tyrosine or phenyalanine amino acid, which canbe exogenously added to the growth medium, into a protein, in responseto a selector codon. Optionally, the compositions of the presentinvention can be in an in vitro translation system, or in an in vivosystem(s).

A cell of the invention provides the ability to synthesize proteins thatcomprise unnatural amino acids in large useful quantities. In oneaspect, the composition optionally includes, e.g., at least 10micrograms, at least 50 micrograms, at least 75 micrograms, at least 100micrograms, at least 200 micrograms, at least 250 micrograms, at least500 micrograms, at least 1 milligram, at least 10 milligrams or more ofthe protein that comprises a homoglutamine or multiple unnatural aminoacids, or an amount that can be achieved with in vivo protein productionmethods (details on recombinant protein production and purification areprovided herein). In another aspect, the protein is optionally presentin the composition at a concentration of, e.g., at least 10 microgramsof protein per liter, at least 50 micrograms of protein per liter, atleast 75 micrograms of protein per liter, at least 100 micrograms ofprotein per liter, at least 200 micrograms of protein per liter, atleast 250 micrograms of protein per liter, at least 500 micrograms ofprotein per liter, at least 1 milligram of protein per liter, or atleast 10 milligrams of protein per liter or more, in, e.g., a celllysate, a buffer, a pharmaceutical buffer, or other liquid suspension(e.g., in a volume of, e.g., anywhere from about 1 nL to about 100 L).The production of large quantities (e.g., greater that that typicallypossible with other methods, e.g., in vitro translation) of a protein ina cell including at least one homoglutamine is a feature of theinvention.

The incorporation of a homoglutamine or other unnatural amino acids canbe done to, e.g., tailor changes in protein structure and/or function,e.g., to change size, acidity, nucleophilicity, hydrogen bonding,hydrophobicity, accessibility of protease target sites, target to amoiety (e.g., for a protein array), etc. Proteins that include ahomoglutamine can have enhanced or even entirely new catalytic orphysical properties. For example, the following properties areoptionally modified by inclusion of a homoglutamine or other unnaturalamino acid into a protein: toxicity, biodistribution, structuralproperties, spectroscopic properties, chemical and/or photochemicalproperties, catalytic ability, half-life (e.g., serum half-life),ability to react with other molecules, e.g., covalently ornoncovalently, and the like. The compositions including proteins thatinclude at least one homoglutamines are useful for, e.g., noveltherapeutics, diagnostics, catalytic enzymes, industrial enzymes,binding proteins (e.g., antibodies), and e.g., the study of proteinstructure and function. See, e.g., Dougherty, (2000) Unnatural AminoAcids as Probes of Protein Structure and Function, Current Opinion inChemical Biology, 4:645-652. In addition, one or more unnatural aminoacids can be incorporated into a polypeptide to provide a molecular tag,e.g., to fix the polypeptide to a solid support. See e.g., “PROTEINARRAYS” by Wang and Schultz, filed Dec. 22, 2003, Attorney Docket Number54-000810PC for an extended discussion of methods of making arrays usingpolypeptides that comprise unnatural amino acids.

In one aspect of the invention, a composition includes at least oneprotein with at least one, e.g., at least two, at least three, at leastfour, at least five, at least six, at least seven, at least eight, atleast nine, or at least ten or more unnatural amino acids, e.g.,homoglutamines and/or other unnatural amino acids. The unnatural aminoacids can be the same or different, e.g., there can be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, 8, 9, or 10 or more different sites in the protein that comprise 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 or more different unnatural amino acids.In another aspect, a composition includes a protein with at least one,but fewer than all, of a particular amino acid present in the protein issubstituted with the homoglutamine. For a given protein with more thanone unnatural amino acids, the unnatural amino acids can be identical ordifferent (e.g., the protein can include two or more different types ofunnatural amino acids, or can include two of the same unnatural aminoacid). For a given protein with more than two unnatural amino acids, theunnatural amino acids can be the same, different or a combination of amultiple unnatural amino acid of the same kind with at least onedifferent unnatural amino acid.

Essentially any protein (or portion thereof) that includes an unnaturalamino acid such as a homoglutamine, or that encodes multiple differentunnatural amino acids (and any corresponding coding nucleic acid, e.g.,which includes one or more selector codons) can be produced using thecompositions and methods herein. No attempt is made to identify thehundreds of thousands of known proteins, any of which can be modified toinclude one or more unnatural amino acid, e.g., by tailoring anyavailable mutation methods to include one or more appropriate selectorcodon in a relevant translation system. Common sequence repositories forknown proteins include GenBank EMBL, DDBJ and the NCBI. Otherrepositories can easily be identified by searching the internet.

Typically, the proteins are, e.g., at least 60%, at least 70%, at least75%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% or moreidentical to any available protein (e.g., a therapeutic protein, adiagnostic protein, an industrial enzyme, or portion thereof, and thelike), and they comprise one or more unnatural amino acid. Examples oftherapeutic, diagnostic, and other proteins that can be modified tocomprise one or more homoglutamine can be found, but not limited to,those in International Application Number PCT/US2004/011786, filed Apr.16, 2004, entitled “Expanding the Eukaryotic Genetic Code;” and, WO2002/085923, entitled “IN VIVO INCORPORATION OF UNNATURAL AMINO ACIDS.”Examples of therapeutic, diagnostic, and other proteins that can bemodified to comprise one or more homoglutamines include, but are notlimited to, e.g., Alpha-1 antitrypsin, Angiostatin, Antihemolyticfactor, antibodies (further details on antibodies are found below),Apolipoprotein, Apoprotein, Atrial natriuretic factor, Atrialnatriuretic polypeptide, Atrial peptides, C-X-C chemokines (e.g.,T39765, NAP-2, ENA-78, Gro-a, Gro-b, Gro-c, IP-10, GCP-2, NAP-4, SDF-1,PF4, MIG), Calcitonin, CC chemokines (e.g., Monocyte chemoattractantprotein-1, Monocyte chemoattractant protein-2, Monocyte chemoattractantprotein-3, Monocyte inflammatory protein-1 alpha, Monocyte inflammatoryprotein-1 beta, RANTES, I309, R83915, R91733, HCC1, T58847, D31065,T64262), CD40 ligand, C-kit Ligand, Collagen, Colony stimulating factor(CSF), Complement factor 5a, Complement inhibitor, Complement receptor1, cytokines, (e.g., epithelial Neutrophil Activating Peptide-78,GROα/MGSA, GROβ, GROγ, MIP-1α, MIP-1δ, MCP-1), Epidermal Growth Factor(EGF), Erythropoietin (“EPO”), Exfoliating toxins A and B, Factor IX,Factor VII, Factor VIII, Factor X, Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF),Fibrinogen, Fibronectin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Glucocerebrosidase,Gonadotropin, growth factors, Hedgehog proteins (e.g., Sonic, Indian,Desert), Hemoglobin, Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Hirudin, Humanserum albumin, Insulin, Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF), interferons(e.g., IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ), interleukins (e.g., IL-1, IL-2, IL3, IL-4,IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-11, IL-12, etc.), KeratinocyteGrowth Factor (KGF), Lactoferrin, leukemia inhibitory factor,Luciferase, Neurturin, Neutrophil inhibitory factor (NFE), oncostatin M,Osteogenic protein, Parathyroid hormone, PD-ECSF, PDGF, peptide hormones(e.g., Human Growth Hormone), Pleiotropin, Protein A, Protein G,Pyrogenic exotoxins A, B, and C, Relaxin, Renin, SCF, Soluble complementreceptor I, Soluble I-CAM 1, Soluble interleukin receptors (IL-1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15), Soluble TNF receptor,Somatomedin, Somatostatin, Somatotropin, Streptokinase, Superantigens,i.e., Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEA, SEB, SEC1, SEC2, SEC3, SED,SEE), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1),Thymosin alpha 1, Tissue plasminogen activator, Tumor necrosis factorbeta (TNF beta), Tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR), Tumor necrosisfactor-alpha (TNF alpha), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGEF),Urokinase and many others.

One class of proteins that can be made using the compositions andmethods for in vivo incorporation of homoglutamines described hereinincludes transcriptional modulators or a portion thereof. Exampletranscriptional modulators include genes and transcriptional modulatorproteins that modulate cell growth, differentiation, regulation, or thelike. Transcriptional modulators are found in prokaryotes, viruses, andeukaryotes, including fungi, plants, yeasts, insects, and animals,including mammals, providing a wide range of therapeutic targets. Itwill be appreciated that expression and transcriptional activatorsregulate transcription by many mechanisms, e.g., by binding toreceptors, stimulating a signal transduction cascade, regulatingexpression of transcription factors, binding to promoters and enhancers,binding to proteins that bind to promoters and enhancers, unwinding DNA,splicing pre-mRNA, polyadenylating RNA, and degrading RNA.

One class of proteins of the invention (e.g., proteins with one or morehomoglutamines) include expression activators such as cytokines,inflammatory molecules, growth factors, their receptors, and oncogeneproducts, e.g., interleukins (e.g., IL-1, IL-2, IL-8, etc.),interferons, FGF, IGF-I, IGF-II, FGF, PDGF, TNF, TGF-α, TGF-β, EGF, KGF,SCF/c-Kit, CD40L/CD40, VLA-4/VCAM-1, ICAM-1/LFA-1, and hyalurin/CD44;signal transduction molecules and corresponding oncogene products, e.g.,Mos, Ras, Raf, and Met; and transcriptional activators and suppressors,e.g., p53, Tat, Fos, Myc, Jun, Myb, Rel, and steroid hormone receptorssuch as those for estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, aldosterone, theLDL receptor ligand and corticosterone.

Enzymes (e.g., industrial enzymes) or portions thereof with at least onehomoglutamine are also provided by the invention. Examples of enzymesinclude, but are not limited to, e.g., amidases, amino acid racemases,acylases, dehalogenases, dioxygenases, diarylpropane peroxidases,epimerases, epoxide hydrolases, esterases, isomerases, kinases, glucoseisomerases, glycosidases, glycosyl transferases, haloperoxidases,monooxygenases (e.g., p450s), lipases, lignin peroxidases, nitrilehydratases, nitrilases, proteases, phosphatases, subtilisins,transaminase, and nucleases.

Many of these proteins are commercially available (See, e.g., the SigmaBioSciences 2003 catalogue and price list), and the correspondingprotein sequences and genes and, typically, many variants thereof, arewell-known (see, e.g., Genbank). Any of them can be modified by theinsertion of one or more homoglutamine or other unnatural amino acidaccording to the invention, e.g., to alter the protein with respect toone or more therapeutic, diagnostic or enzymatic properties of interest.Examples of therapeutically relevant properties include serum half-life,shelf half-life, stability, immunogenicity, therapeutic activity,detectability (e.g., by the inclusion of reporter groups (e.g., labelsor label binding sites) in the unnatural amino acids, e.g.,homoglutamines), reduction of LD₅₀ or other side effects, ability toenter the body through the gastric tract (e.g., oral availability), orthe like. Examples of diagnostic properties include shelf half-life,stability, diagnostic activity, detectability, or the like. Examples ofrelevant enzymatic properties include shelf half-life, stability,enzymatic activity, production capability, or the like.

A variety of other proteins can also be modified to include one or morehomoglutamine or other unnatural amino acid of the invention. Forexample, the invention can include substituting one or more naturalamino acids in one or more vaccine proteins with a homoglutamine, e.g.,in proteins from infectious fungi, e.g., Aspergillus, Candida species;bacteria, particularly E. coli, which serves a model for pathogenicbacteria, as well as medically important bacteria such as Staphylococci(e.g., aureus), or Streptococci (e.g., pneumoniae); protozoa such assporozoa (e.g., Plasmodia), rhizopods (e.g., Entamoeba) and flagellates(Trypanosoma, Leishmania, Trichomonas, Giardia, etc.); viruses such as(+) RNA viruses (examples include Poxviruses e.g., vaccinia;Picornaviruses, e.g. polio; Togaviruses, e.g., rubella; Flaviviruses,e.g., HCV; and Coronaviruses), (−) RNA viruses (e.g., Rhabdoviruses,e.g., VSV; Paramyxovimses, e.g., RSV; Orthomyxovimses, e.g., influenza;Bunyaviruses; and Arenaviruses), dsDNA viruses (Reoviruses, forexample), RNA to DNA viruses, i.e., Retroviruses, e.g., HIV and HTLV,and certain DNA to RNA viruses such as Hepatitis B.

Agriculturally related proteins such as insect resistance proteins(e.g., the Cry proteins), starch and lipid production enzymes, plant andinsect toxins, toxin-resistance proteins, Mycotoxin detoxificationproteins, plant growth enzymes (e.g., Ribulose 1,5-BisphosphateCarboxylase/Oxygenase, “RUBISCO”), lipoxygenase (LOX), andPhosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase are also suitable targets forhomoglutamine or other unnatural amino acid modification.

In certain embodiments, the protein or polypeptide of interest (orportion thereof) in the methods and/or compositions of the invention isencoded by a nucleic acid. Typically, the nucleic acid comprises atleast one selector codon, at least two selector codons, at least threeselector codons, at least four selector codons, at least five selectorcodons, at least six selector codons, at least seven selector codons, atleast eight selector codons, at least nine selector codons, ten or moreselector codons.

Genes coding for proteins or polypeptides of interest can be mutagenizedusing methods well-known to one of skill in the art and described hereinunder “Mutagenesis and Other Molecular Biology Techniques” to include,e.g., one or more selector codon for the incorporation of ahomoglutamine. For example, a nucleic acid for a protein of interest ismutagenized to include one or more selector codon, providing for theinsertion of the one or more homoglutamines. The invention includes anysuch variant, e.g., mutant, versions of any protein, e.g., including atleast one homoglutamine. Similarly, the invention also includescorresponding nucleic acids, i.e., any nucleic acid with one or moreselector codon that encodes one or more homoglutamine.

To make a protein that includes a homoglutamine, one can use host cellsand organisms that are adapted for the in vivo incorporation of thehomoglutamine via orthogonal tRNA/RS pairs. Host cells are geneticallyengineered (e.g., transformed, transduced or transfected) with one ormore vectors that express the orthogonal tRNA, the orthogonal tRNAsynthetase, and a vector that encodes the protein to be derivatized.Each of these components can be on the same vector, or each can be on aseparate vector, or two components can be on one vector and the thirdcomponent on a second vector. The vector can be, for example, in theform of a plasmid, a bacterium, a virus, a naked polynucleotide, or aconjugated polynucleotide.

Defining Polypeptides by Immunoreactivity

Because the polypeptides of the invention provide a variety of newpolypeptide sequences (e.g., comprising homoglutamines in the case ofproteins synthesized in the translation systems herein, or, e.g., in thecase of the novel synthetases, novel sequences of standard amino acids),the polypeptides also provide new structural features which can berecognized, e.g., in immunological assays. The generation of antisera,which specifically bind the polypeptides of the invention, as well asthe polypeptides which are bound by such antisera, are a feature of theinvention. The term “antibody,” as used herein, includes, but is notlimited to a polypeptide substantially encoded by an immunoglobulin geneor immunoglobulin genes, or fragments thereof which specifically bindand recognize an analyte (antigen). Examples include polyclonal,monoclonal, chimeric, and single chain antibodies, and the like.Fragments of immunoglobulins, including Fab fragments and fragmentsproduced by an expression library, including phage display, are alsoincluded in the term “antibody” as used herein. See, e.g., Paul,Fundamental Immunology, 4th Ed., 1999, Raven Press, New York, forantibody structure and terminology.

In order to produce antisera for use in an immunoassay, one or more ofthe immunogenic polypeptides is produced and purified as describedherein. For example, recombinant protein can be produced in arecombinant cell. An inbred strain of mice (used in this assay becauseresults are more reproducible due to the virtual genetic identity of themice) is immunized with the immunogenic protein(s) in combination with astandard adjuvant, such as Freund's adjuvant, and a standard mouseimmunization protocol (see, e.g., Harlow and Lane (1988) Antibodies, ALaboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Publications, New York, for astandard description of antibody generation, immunoassay formats andconditions that can be used to determine specific immunoreactivity.Additional details on proteins, antibodies, antisera, etc. can be foundin U.S. Ser. No. 60/479,931, 60/463,869, and 60/496,548 entitled“Expanding the Eukaryotic Genetic Code;” WO 2002/085923, entitled “INVIVO INCORPORATION OF UNNATURAL AMINO ACIDS;” patent applicationentitled “Glycoprotein synthesis” filed Jan. 16, 2003, U.S. Ser. No.60/441,450; and patent application entitled “Protein Arrays,” attorneydocket number P1001US00 filed on Dec. 22, 2002.

Use of O-tRNA and O-RS and O-tRNA/O-RS Pairs

The compositions of the invention and compositions made by the methodsof the invention optionally are in a cell. The O-tRNA/O-RS pairs orindividual components of the invention can then be used in a hostsystem's translation machinery, which results in a homoglutamine beingincorporated into a protein. The patent application “In vivoIncorporation of Unnatural Amino Acids”, WO 2002/085923 by Schultz, etal. describes this process and is incorporated herein by reference. Forexample, when an O-tRNA/O-RS pair is introduced into a host, e.g.,Escherichia coli, the pair leads to the in vivo incorporation of ahomoglutamine, which can be exogenously added to the growth medium, intoa protein, e.g., myoglobin or a therapeutic protein, in response to aselector codon, e.g., an amber nonsense codon. Optionally, thecompositions of the invention can be in an in vitro translation system,or in an in vivo system(s). Proteins with the homoglutamine can be usedas theraupetic proteins and can be used to facilitate studies on proteinstructure, interactions with other protein, electron transfer processesin proteins, and the like.

Kits

Kits are also a feature of the invention. For example, a kit forproducing a protein that comprises at least one homoglutamine in a cellis provided, where the kit includes a container containing apolynucleotide sequence encoding an O-tRNA, and/or an O-tRNA, and/or apolynucleotide sequence encoding an O-RS, and/or an O-RS. In oneembodiment, the kit further includes a homoglutamine. In anotherembodiment, the kit further comprises instructional materials forproducing the protein. Any composition, system or device of theinvention can also be associated with appropriate packaging materials(e.g., containers, etc.) for production in kit form.

EXAMPLES

The following examples are offered to illustrate, but not to limit theclaimed invention. One of skill will recognize a variety of non-criticalparameters that may be altered without departing from the scope of theclaimed invention.

Example 1 Production OF Orthogonal Synthase/tRNA Pair Derived fromArchael TRNA^(LYS)

An orthogonal synthetase-tRNA pair was constructed from the lysyl-tRNAsynthetase of Pyrococcus horikoshii. Using an amber suppressor tRNAderived from the consensus of a multiple sequence alignment of archealtRNAlys sequences, 32% amber suppression was observed in β-galactosidaseassays. As such, this pair is a highly efficient system for theselective incorporation of unnatural amino acids into protein in E.coli.

The expansion of the genetic code of an organism to include additionalamino acids beyond the common twenty requires a minimum of two novelgenes: an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that selectively activates theunnatural amino acid and does not transfer the amino acid to endogenoustRNAs; and a cognate orthogonal tRNA that accepts the unnatural aminoacid and is not charged by endogenous synthetases (Furter, (1998)Protein Sci., 7:419-426). In addition, the tRNA deliver the amino acidin response to a noncoding codon, e.g., a nonsense or frameshift codon.Variants of a Methanococcus jannaschii tyrosyl tRNA-synthetase andcognate amber suppressor tRNA pair (Wang et al., (2000) J. Am. Chem.Soc., 122:5010-5011; Wang et al., (2001) Science, 292:498-500) have beenidentified that fulfill these criteria, and have been used toefficiently incorporate a variety of unnatural amino acids, includingketo-containing (Wang et al., (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,100:56-61) and photo-crosslinking amino acids, into proteins in E. coliwith high fidelity (Chin et al., (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,99:11020-11024; Chin and Schultz, (2002) ChemBioChem, 3:1135-1137).Broadening the scope and number of unnatural amino acids that can begenetically encoded will likely use new orthogonal synthetase-tRNA pairsand new codons to encode them (Magliery et al., (2001) J. Mol. Biol.,307:755-769; Anderson et al., (2002) Chem. Biol., 9:237-244).

Recently a novel approach was taken to construct an orthogonal pairderived from the Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum leucyl-tRNAsynthetase and cognate orthogonal amber, opal, and four-base suppressortRNAs derived from Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (Anderson and Schultz, (2003)Biochemistry, 42(32):9598-608). The design of these suppressor tRNAsfrom the consensus sequence of a multiple sequence alignment of archaealleucyl-tRNAs provided efficient, orthogonal frameshift and opalsuppressors. Robust orthogonal suppressor tRNAs had CU(X)XXXAA anticodonloops (where (X)XXX is the reverse complement sequence of the codon) andno mispaired bases in stem regions. We now report the use of this“consensus suppressor” strategy in the rational design of an efficientorthogonal synthetase-tRNA pair derived from archaeal tRNA^(Lys)sequences and the lysyl-tRNA synthetase of the archaean Pyrococcushorikoshii.

This tRNA/synthetase pair has a number of attractive features for theconstruction of an orthogonal suppressor pair in E. coli. An orthogonaltRNA for use in E. coli should not cross-react with E. coliaminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Despite the similarity between thetRNA^(Lys) sequences of prokaryotes and archaea, the discriminator base73 is A in prokaryotes and G in archaea (Ibba et al., (1999) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96:418-423), which prevents archaeal tRNA^(Lys)s fromserving as substrates for E. coli synthetases. Indeed, E. coli totalcell lysates were found to poorly acylate tRNA from the archaeanHalobacterium cutirubrum (Kwok and Wong, (1980) Can. J. Biochem.,58:213-218). To construct suppressor tRNAs, changes to the sequence ofthe anticodon are allowed without adversely affecting aminoacylationactivity. Studies on tRNA recognition by the lysyl-tRNA synthetase ofthe archaean Pyrococcus horikoshii (PhKRS) (Terada et al., (2002) Nat.Struct. Biol., 9:257-262) revealed that the anticodon can be alteredwithout impairing recognition of the tRNA. Therefore, it is likely thatsuppressor tRNAs for codons such as the amber nonsense codon, UAG, canbe constructed from these tRNAs. Finally, the crystal structure of thearchaeal type I lysyl-tRNA synthetase, PhKRS, is available (Terada etal., (2002) Nat. Struct. Biol., 9:257-262) to facilitate changes in theamino acid specificity of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase.

To determine whether PhKRS is orthogonal in E. coli, it was useful todemonstrate that the synthetase does not charge E. coli tRNA to anysignificant extent. The gene for PhKRS was PCR-amplified from genomicDNA, inserted into the plasmid pBAD-Myc/HisA (Invitrogen), andoverexpressed. The resulting PhKRS protein was purified to homogeneity.Aminoacylation assays were performed on whole tRNA from Halobacteriumsp. NRC-1 or E. coli. The sequences of the tRNA^(Lys)s fromHalobacterium sp. NRC-1 and Pyrococcus horikoshii are highly homologous(FIG. 1). The halobacterial tRNA was, therefore, anticipated to bereadily charged by PhKRS. Indeed, PhKRS charges a 14-fold greater amountof whole halobacterial tRNA than whole E. coli tRNA in 20 minutes (FIG.2; 10 μM [tRNA]). Although PhKRS is able to weakly charge E. coli tRNA,the rate is 28-fold lower than the activity of the E. coli synthetasetowards the same concentration of whole E. coli tRNA and only 7-foldover background charging. Furthermore, the highly homologous archaealsynthetase from M. mariplaudis could only weakly complement a lysS/lysUdouble mutant deficient in E. coli lysyl-tRNA synthetase (Ibba et al.,(1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96:418-423). Therefore, PHKRS islikely to compete poorly with endogenous E. coli synthetases forcharging of E. coli tRNAs in vivo.

To further characterize the orthogonality of PhKRS, we attempted toinsert the PhKRS gene into the constitutive expression vector, pKQ. Thisplasmid contains the ribosome binding site, multiple cloning site, andrrnB terminator from plasmid pBAD-Myc/HisA (Invitrogen) under control ofthe constitutive glutamine promoter. The plasmid also contains a ColE1origin of replication, and a kanamycin resistance selectable marker forplasmid maintenance. Unfortunately, the wild-type PhKRS gene appeared tobe toxic when expressed constitutively. However, a serendipitous E444Gmutant (plasmid pKQ-PhE444G) was identified that exhibited reducedtoxicity when expressed in E. coli. The mechanism by which the E444Gmutation alleviates apparent toxicity in this system has not beenestablished. One possibility is that the mutation prevents the low-levelcross-species mischarging of E. coli tRNA observed in vitro.

The next step involved the construction of a nonsense suppressor tRNAthat could be charged by PhKRS. The weak anticodon binding determinantsobserved for PhKRS suggest that the enzyme should accept tRNAs with avariety of anticodon sequences (Terada et al., (2002) Nat. Struct.Biol., 9:257-262). Because amber suppression is the best-characterizedand most efficient form of suppression in E. coli. (Anderson et al.,(2002) Chem. Biol., 9:237-244), we constructed an orthogonal archaealamber suppressor tRNA, AK_(CUA), from the consensus sequence (Andersonand Schultz, (2003) Biochemistry, 42(32):9598-608). A multiple sequencealignment of all archaeal tRNA^(Lys) sequences from available genomicsequences was performed using the GCG program pileup (FIG. 1). Theconsensus sequence of the aligned tRNAs was determined and a cloverleafrepresentation was generated (FIG. 3). The sequence was then inspectedfor non-canonical base pairs or base mismatches in stem regions, whichhave been found to reduce suppressor efficiency (Hou et al., (1992)Biochemistry, 31:4157-4160). No such mispairs were present in thetRNA^(Lys) consensus sequence. The anticodon loop was then changed toCUCUAAA since this sequence has been found to be optimal for ambersuppression (Yarus et al., (1986) J. Mol. Biol., 192:235-255). Thedesigned tRNA sequence was constructed by the overlap extension ofsynthetic oligonucleotides (Genosys) and inserted between the EcoRI andPstI restriction sites of plasmid pACGFP (Magliery et al., (2001) J.Mol. Biol., 307:755-769) under the control of the strong, constitutivelpp promoter. The resulting plasmid, pAC-AK_(CUA), also contains thep15A origin of replication and a chloramphenicol resistance selectablemarker.

To examine the suppression efficiency of this potential orthogonalsynthetase-tRNA pair, GeneHogs E. coli cells (Invitrogen) werecotransformed with pKQ-PhE444G, pAC-AK_(CUA), and a lacZ reporterplasmid pLASC-lacZ(TAG) (Anderson and Schultz, (2003) Biochemistry,42(32):9598-608). This plasmid, derived from pSC101, contains anampicillin resistance selectable marker and the lacZ gene encodingβ-galactosidase under the control of the Ipp promoter. There is an ambercodon at a permissive site, residue 25, of the lacZ gene, which causespremature termination. In the absence of an amber suppressor tRNA, cellsharboring pLASC-lacZ(TAG) have only 0.17% of the β-galactosidaseactivity observed for plasmid pLASC-lacZ(Lys) which contains an AAA(lysine) sense codon at position 25 and only 2-fold higher activity thancells containing no plasmids. If AK_(CUA) is unable to be charged byendogenous E. coli synthetases, little amber suppression should beobserved when the tRNA is coexpressed with pLASC-lacZ(TAG). Only 1.7%suppression (relative to the expression of lacZ(lys)) is observed forcells harboring PAC-AK_(CUA) and pLASC-lacZ(TAG). If PhKRS is able tocharge the orthogonal tRNA, then a higher level of amber suppressionshould be observed when plasmid pKQ-PhE444G is introduced into thesystem. Indeed, 32% suppression is observed. In comparison, theorthogonal M. jannaschii-derived tyrosine synthetase-tRNA pair describedpreviously for E. coli exhibits a suppression efficiency of 18.5% in thepresence of the cognate synthetase and 0.2% suppression in the absenceof the synthetase. The M. thermoautotrophicum-derived leucine amberorthogonal pair gives 33.2% and 1.5% suppression with and without thecognate synthetase, respectively (Anderson and Schultz, (2003)Biochemistry, 42(32):9598-608).

In this example, we have identified the type I lysyl-tRNA synthetase andan amber suppressor tRNA derived from the multiple-sequence alignment ofarchaeal tRNA^(Lys) sequences as an orthogonal synthetase-tRNA pair forthe site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids in E. coli. Thehigh efficiency (32% suppression) observed for the PhKRS/AK_(CUA) pairdemonstrates the effectiveness of the consensus sequence strategy forthe construction of efficient orthogonal suppressor tRNAs.

EXAMPLE 2 Frameshift Suppression with an Unnatural Amino AcidEliminating the Toxicity of PHKRS

An orthogonal tRNA-synthetase pair derived from the type I lysyl-tRNAsynthetase of Pyrococcus horikoshii has been developed for use in E.coli. The tRNA portion of the system functioned very well as anorthogonal amber suppressor. The synthetase-expression plasmidpKQ-PhE444G was able to charge this tRNA, but toxicity effects werestill observed. When expressed alone, cells harboring pKQ-PhE444G growto 56% of the density observed for cells with no plasmid. Reporterplasmids pAC-AK_(CUA) and pAC-AK_(CUA) show moderate toxicity as well,growing to 71% and 52%. When pKQ-PhE444G is cotransformed with plasmidpAC-AK_(CUA), cell density is decreased to 17%. In addition, cells reacha density of only 5% when coexpressed with the β-lactamase reporterplasmid pAC-AK_(CUA) (a derivative of plasmid pACKO-A184TAG). It istherefore clear that there is toxicity with both the tRNA and thesynthetase in this system. Furthermore, there appears to be asynergistic effect wherein cells cotransformed with both plasmids aredrastically reduced in viability. To address this issue, we sought aless toxic mutant of PhKRS.

It was anticipated that point or other mutations in PhKRS might reducethe toxicity of the synthetase while retaining charging activity.Therefore, pKQ-PhE444G was transformed into chemically competent XL1-redcells (Stratagene) and the cells were plated on LB-agar platescontaining 25 ug/mL kanamycin. This strain has several genomic mutationsthat cause a high rate of mutagenesis in transformed plasmids.Approximately 100 colonies were scraped from this plate and amplified in25 mL of liquid LB media supplemented with kanamycin. It was anticipatedthat nontoxic mutants of pKQ-PhE444G would grow faster than thewild-type, and serial culture of the cells would lead to theaccumulation of these mutants. After 2 serial cultures with 10000-folddilution at each step, the cells were miniprepped and introduced intoGenehog cells containing plasmid pAC-AK_(CUA) and plated on LB-agarplates containing 25 ug/mL each of kanamycin and chloramphenicol, andvarious concentrations of ampicillin. Greater than 90% of thetransformed cells exhibited no apparent toxicity and were able tosurvive on LB-agar plates containing 1000 ug/mL ampicillin. Smallercolonies were observed even at 1500 ug/mL ampicillin indicatingefficient amber suppression. One mutant synthetase, designatedpKQ-PhKep, was isolated and characterized by restriction mapping andsequencing of the PHKRS open reading frame. The mutant gene contains aninsertion of 778 bp following residue S357, but is otherwise the samesequence as plasmid pKQ-PhE444G. A BLAST search revealed that thisinsertion is homologous to a sequence annotated as “insAcp1” fromplasmid p1658/97, but no other mention of this sequence has beenobserved in the literature, and the source of this sequence is unknown.When translated from the start codon of PhKRS, the predicted product ofthis gene is truncated 6 amino acids downstream of S357. To test whetherthe truncation of PhKRS was responsible for the elimination of toxicity,primer CA510R with sequence 5′-CAGTGGAATTCAGTAAGTTGGCAGCATCAC-3′ wassynthesized to explicitly construct the truncation mutant in plasmidpKQ. Plasmid pKQ-PhKep was PCR-amplified with CA279 and CA510R, and theproduct was subcloned into the NcoI and EcoRI sites of plasmid pKQ. Theresulting plasmid, pKQ-PhΔAD (also known as pKQ-Ph510), wascotransformed with plasmid pAC-AK_(CUA) and the resultingtransformatations were found to have a similar IC₅₀ topKQ-PhKep-transformed cells and no apparent toxicity.

The truncation after residue S357 appears to delete the anticodonbinding domain of PhKRS, and we wanted to examine how this deletionaffects the tRNA recognition properties of the synthetase. Therfore, weoverexpressed synthetase and to perform aminoacylation assays in vitro.The gene was PCR-amplified from pKQ-PhKep with CA279 and CA511(5′-CATTGGAATTCGAGTAAGTTGGCAGCATCAC-3′) and subcloned into the NcoI andEcoRI sites of pBAD-Myc/HisA in frame with the C-terminal Myc/His tag.Protein was purified by Ni-NTA chromatography.

Example 3 Expanding the Genetic Code with Four-Base Codons and UnnatualAmino Acids

Although, with few exceptions, the genetic codes of all known organismsencode the same twenty amino acids, all that is required to add a newbuilding block are a unique tRNA/aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase pair, asource of the amino acid, and a unique codon that specifies the aminoacid (Wang et al., (2001) Expanding the genetic code. Science292:498-500). Previously, we have shown that the amber nonsense codon,TAG, together with orthogonal M. jannaschii and E. coli tRNA/synthetasepairs can be used to genetically encode a variety a variety of aminoacids with novel properties in E. coli (Wang et al., (2003) Addition ofthe keto functional group to the genetic code of Escherichia coli. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:56-61; Santoro et al., (2002) An efficientsystem for the evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase specificity. Nat.Biotechnol. 20:1044-8; Chin et al., (2002) Addition of aphotocrosslinking amino acid to the genetic code of Escherichia coli.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:11020-11024; Mehl et al. (2003)Generation of a bacterium with a 21 amino acid genetic code. J. Am.Chem. Soc. 125:935-9), and yeast (Chin et al. (2003) An expandedeukaryotic genetic code. Science 301:964-7), respectively. The limitednumber of noncoding triplet codons, however, severely restricts theultimate number of amino acids encoded by any organism. Here we reportthe generation of a new orthogonal synthetase/tRNA pair derived fromarchaeal tRNA^(Lys) sequences that efficiently and selectivelyincorporates the amino acid homoglutamine (hGln) into myoglobin inresponse to the four-base codon AGGA. Frameshift suppression with hGlndoes not significantly affect protein yields or cell growth rates, andwas shown to be mutually orthogonal with suppression of TAG. This worksuggests that neither the number of available triplet codons nor thetranslational machinery itself represents a significant barrier tofurther expansion of the code.

There are many examples of naturally occurring +1 frameshift suppressorsincluding UAGN (N=A, G, C or T) suppressors derived from Su7 encodingglutamine (Curran and Yarus (1987) Reading frame selection and transferRNA anticodon loop stacking. Science 238:1545-50), sufJ-derivedsuppressors of ACCN codons encoding threonine (Bossi and Roth (1981)Four-base codons ACCA, ACCU and ACCC are recognized by frameshiftsuppressor sufJ. Cell 25:489-96), and CAAA suppressors derived fromtRNA^(Lys) and tRNA^(Gln) (O'Connor (2002) Insertions in the anticodonloop of tRNA(1)(Gln)(sufG) and tRNA(Lys) promote quadruplet decoding ofCAAA. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1985-1990). Moreover, genetic selectionshave been used to identify efficient four- and five-base codonsuppressor tRNAs from large libraries of mutant tRNAs, including an E.coli tRNA_(UCCU) ^(Ser) suppressor (Magliery et al., (2001) Expandingthe genetic code: selection of efficient suppressors of four-base codonsand identification of “shifty” four-base codons with a library approachin Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 307:755-769; Anderson et al., (2002)Exploring the limits of codon and anticodon size. Chem. Biol. 9:237-244;Hohsaka et al., (1999) Incorporation of two nonnatural amino acids intoproteins through extension of the genetic code. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser.42:79-80; Hohsaka et al., (2001) Five-base codons for incorporation ofnonnatural amino acids into proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:3646-51;Hohsaka and Sisido (2002) Incorporation of non-natural amino acids intoproteins. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6:809-15).

In order to encode unnatural amino acids with quadruplet codons in vivo,one has to generate a tRNA that uniquely recognizes this codon and acorresponding synthetase that uniquely aminoacylates only this tRNA withthe unnatural amino acid of interest. Because the anticodon loop of thepreviously generated orthogonal M. jannaschii amber suppressor tRNA is akey recognition element for the cognate synthetase, JYRS, it wasdifficult to engineer this tRNA to decode a four-base codon. Although itmay be possible to relax the anticodon binding specificity of JYRS, itwould likely be difficult to construct mutually orthogonal pairs thatdistinguish amber and four-base suppressors using exclusively theanticodon sequence. Therefore, a system that permitted the simultaneousincorporation of two unnatural amino acids into a polypeptide would mostlikely be achieved using two orthogonal pairs of distinct origin,necessitating, the development a new orthogonal tRNA-synthetase pair.

We initially focused on the lysyl synthetase/tRNA pair of the archaeanPyrococcus horikoshii (PhKRS) as a candidate orthogonal pair since 1)this pair is likely to be orthogonal due to the conservation of A73 inprokaryotes and G73 in archaea (Ibba et al. (1999) Substrate recognitionby class I lysyl-tRNA synthetases: a molecular basis for genedisplacement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:418-423), 2) PhKRS istolerant of substitutions to the tRNA anticodon loop permitting thecharging of suppressor tRNAs (Terada et al. (2002) Functionalconvergence of two lysyl-tRNA synthetases with unrelated topologies.Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:257-262), and 3) the crystal structure of PhKRS isavailable (Terada et al. (2002) Functional convergence of two lysyl-tRNAsynthetases with unrelated topologies. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:257-262) tofacilitate changes in amino acid specificity. Unfortunately, we foundthat PhKRS is toxic to E. coli cells when expressed constitutively.However, serial culture in the mutator strain XL1-red led to theisolation of a non-toxic variant, PhΔAD, which is truncated 6 aminoacids downstream of residue S357 because of a 778 bp insertion elementannotated as insAcp1. As such, the anticodon loop-binding domain hasbeen deleted, further minimizing any loss in activity that might resultfrom anticodon loop replacement.

As noted in more detail in Example 1, to determine whether thistruncation mutant is functional and orthogonal in E. coli, it was usefulto demonstrate that the synthetase cannot charge E. coli tRNA to anysignificant extent but retains activity towards cognate archaeal tRNA.Genes for PhΔAD and EcKRS were cloned and overexpressed and protein waspurified to homogeneity. Aminoacylation of whole tRNA from anarchaebacterium, Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, or E. coli was assayed. PHΔADcharges a greater amount of whole halobacterial tRNA than whole E. colitRNA in 20 minutes (FIG. 2; 10 μM [tRNA]). Although PHΔAD is able toweakly charge E. coli tRNA, the rate is 28-fold lower than the activityof the E. coli synthetase towards the same concentration of whole E.coli tRNA and only 7-fold over background charging. Furthermore, PhΔADwas unable to complement growth at 43° C. of strain PALΔSΔUTR(pMAKlysU)(Chen et al., (1994) Properties of the lysyl-tRNA synthetase gene andproduct from the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol.176:2699-705), a lysS/lysU double mutant deficient in E. coli lysyl-tRNAsynthetase. However, EcKRS (cloned from the lysU locus of E. coli strainHB101) afforded normal growth. Therefore, PHΔAD is unable to substitutefor EcKRS and would likely compete poorly with endogenous E. colisynthetases for charging of E. coli tRNAs in vivo.

To demonstrate that PhΔAD was functional in E. coli, we used aα-lactamase suppression assay with an orthogonal amber suppressor tRNAfor PhΔAD. This approach also allowed us to use the selection schemespreviously developed for the M. jannaschii orthogonal pair. A suppressortRNA_(CUA) (AK_(CUA)) was designed using a recently-describedconsensus-suppressor strategy (Anderson and Schultz, P. G. (2003)Adaptation of an Orthogonal Archaeal Leucyl-tRNA and Synthetase Pair forFour-base, Amber, and Opal Suppression. Biochemistry 42:9598-608). Amultiple sequence alignment of all archaeal tRNA^(Lys) sequences fromavailable genomic sequences was performed and a consensus sequence wasdetermined. The anticodon loop sequence was changed to CUCUAAA to affordan amber suppressor tRNA (FIG. 1). The gene for AK_(CUA) was synthesizedand inserted into plasmid pACKO-A184TAG (Anderson and Schultz, P. G.(2003) Adaptation of an Orthogonal Archaeal Leucyl-tRNA and SynthetasePair for Four-base, Amber, and Opal Suppression. Biochemistry42:9598-608) to examine amber suppression efficiency. This plasmidcontains a gene for β-lactamase (bla) with a TAG codon at the permissivesite A184. With no tRNA, translation affords no observable full-lengthβ-lactamase, and sensitivity to 5 μg/mL ampicillin. When expressed withAK_(CUA), no increase in ampicillin resistance was observed indicatingthat the tRNA is uncharged by E. coli synthetases. When coexpressed withPhΔAD, the orthogonal tRNA was charged leading to efficient ambersuppression and resistance to 1000 μg/mL ampicillin. The PhΔAD/AK_(CUA)orthogonal pair is therefore an efficient and orthogonal ambersuppression system.

Previously, it was shown that the four-base codon AGGA can beefficiently suppressed by an E. coli tRNA_(UCCU) ^(Ser). In this casesuppression of the four-base codon is competing with the rare codon AGGwhich may contribute to the efficiency and lack of toxicity of thesuppressor tRNA. An AGGA suppressor tRNA was designed from AK_(CUA) bychanging the anticodon loop to CUUCCUAA and inserted into plasmidpACKO-A184AGGA. Similar to pACKO-A184TAG, this plasmid contains an AGGAcodon at position A184 resulting in abortive translation and resistanceto only 5 μg/mL ampicillin. Unfortunately, this tRNA is no longerorthogonal to E. coli synthetases. Cells containing the designed tRNAsurvive to 200 μg/mL ampicillin both in the absence and presence ofPhΔAD.

To identify orthogonal variants, we constructed a library in which thelast four base pairs of the acceptor stem, positions 1-4 and 69-72, weresimultaneously randomized (Anderson and Schultz, P. G. (2003) Adaptationof an Orthogonal Archaeal Leucyl-tRNA and Synthetase Pair for Four-base,Amber, and Opal Suppression. Biochemistry 42:9598-608). These tRNAs werecoexpressed with PhΔAD and cells were subjected to two rounds ofampicillin selection at 200 μg/mL resulting in a pool of active AGGAsuppressor tRNAs. To identify orthogonal variants, tRNA plasmids wereisolated and 384 individual clones were screened for sensitivity toampicillin in the absence of PhΔAD. Of these, the most efficient andorthogonal clone is resistant to 700 μg/mL ampicillin in the presence ofPhΔAD but survives to only 5 μg/mL in its absence. This tRNA, AK_(UCCU),contains multiple acceptor stem substitutions and a serendipitous A37Cmutation of unknown importance (FIG. 5).

To incorporate homoglutamine in response to AGGA, it was next useful toalter the specificity of PhΔAD. Homoglutamine was chosen as an initialtarget to test the fidelity of a modified synthetase because it issimilar in size to lysine and has both hydrogen bond donating andaccepting properties. Examination of the PhKRS crystal structure, onlytwo residues specifically recognize the ε-amino group of lysine, E41 andY268. They were simultaneously randomized by saturation mutagenesis inthe construction of a small active site library derived from PhΔAD. Toscreen for hGln-specific synthetases, we used a GFP reporter plasmid,pREP2-AK_(CUA) (Santoro et al., (2002) An efficient system for theevolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase specificity. Nat. Biotechnol.20:1044-8) which encodes the gene for AK_(CUA), a T7 RNA polymerase genewith two TAG codons at positions M1 and Q107, and GFPuv under thecontrol of a T7 promoter. When cotransformed with pREP2-AK_(CUA) andPhΔAD, the amber codons in T7RNAP are suppressed resulting in GFPuvexpression and green fluorescence. In the absence of the synthetase,cells are white. As such, cells harboring active synthetases can beidentified by observing fluorescence. Cells were cotransformed withpREP2-AK_(CUA) and the library was then spread on plates containinghGln. Individual green colonies were isolated and grown with and withoutthe unnatural amino acid to identify clones whose fluorescence requiredhGln. Of 15 colonies screened, 5 showed a higher fluorescence on platescontaining hGln. Of these, all but one conserved a Y268S substitution;the most selective of these synthetases, hGlnRS, has I41 and S268 andwas characterized further. The 5 mutants corresponding to the 5 colonieshad the following sequence changes, as compared to PhΔAD: CloneY268(codon) E41(codon) Clone 2 Ser(TCT) Val(GTT) Clone 3 Ser(TCG)Thr(ACG) Clone 4 Ser(AGT) Ser(AGT) Clone 5 Ser(TCG) Ile(ATT) Clone 6Gly(GGT) Pro(CCG).

Myoglobin protein with a Gly24ΘAGGA mutation was then expressed usingthe orthogonal hGlnRS/AK_(TCCT) pair to determine whether the observedhGln-dependent phenotype resulted from the specific incorporation of theunnatural amino acid. Upon expression of the mutant myoglobin gene inthe absence hGlnRS, no detectable protein was produced. When coexpressedwith hGlnRS, 1.8 mg/mL myoglobin was isolated. In comparison, 3.8 mg/mLof myoglobin was produced upon expression of plasmid pBAD-JYAMB whichcontains the wild-type myoglobin gene. MALDI-TOF analysis of trypticfragments of the purified protein revealed a peptide of mass 1676.85 Da,consistent with the predicted mass of 1676.88 Da. No evidence ofpeptides containing lysine or glutamine at position 24 were observed.Furthermore, we observed little toxicity during hGln incorporation inresponse to AGGA. During midlog growth under the conditions used formyoglobin expression without arabinose induction, doubling time forGeneHogs cells is twice that of cells incorporating hGln. This reductionin growth rate was observed both in the presence and absence of hGlnindicating that the slight toxicity is the result of synthetase and tRNAexpression rather than AGGA suppression. Therefore, cross-reactivity ofthe AGGA suppressor with rare AGG codons does not limit the practicalapplication of frameshift suppression.

The expression of myoglobin by AGGA suppression to incorporate a hGlnresidue is demonstrated in FIG. 7A. This figure provides a western blotprobed with an anti-His C-terminal antibody. Protein was produced fromthe myoglobin gene with an AGGA codon at position G24 (Myo24AGGA) onlyin the presence of all three components, AK514 tRNA, hGlnRS (anhGln-specific variant of PhKRSΔ) and hGln (lanes 2-5). Expression ofmyoglobin by amber suppression at position 75 (Myo75TAG) was onlypossible with JYRS and its cognate amber tRNA, demonstrating the mutualorthogonality of the lysyl and tyrosyl pairs (lanes 6-9).

We also investigated the possibility of using the PhΔAD/AK_(UCCU) pairin combination with the M. jannaschii tyrosine synthetase (JYRS) for thesimultaneous suppression of TAG and AGGA in a single polypeptide. Whencoexpressed with JYRS in plasmid pBK-JYRS, pMyo-AK_(UCCU) affords nodetectable myoglobin. Therefore, JYRS is unable to charge AK_(UCCU).Conversely, we attempted to express myoglobin from plasmidpBAD/JYAMB-4TAG by charging with PhΔAD. This expression plasmid containsthe myoglobin gene with a TAG codon at position 4 and an orthogonaltRNA^(Tyr), J17 (Mehl et al. (2003) Generation of a bacterium with a 21amino acid genetic code. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:935-9). Coexpression withJYRS affords 3.8 mg/mL of myoglobin, but no protein is observed withPhΔAD. Therefore, PhΔAD is unable to charge J17. As such, thesesynthetaseltRNA pairs are mutually orthogonal and could be used incombination without cross-reacting.

For the incorporation of two unnatural amino acids into myoglobin,AK_(UCCU) and J17 were combined into a single plasmid expressing amutant myoglobin with Gly24ΘAGGA and Ala75→TAG. AnO-Methyl-L-tyrosine-specific synthetase (OMeYRS) (Chin et al., (2002)Addition of a photocrosslinking amino acid to the genetic code ofEscherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:11020-11024) derivedfrom JYRS and hGlnRS were combined in a second plasmid. When cellscotransformed with both plasmids were grown in the presence of bothamino acids, 1.7 mg/L of myoglobin was produced. No protein was producedwhen either of the two unnatural amino acids or synthetases wasexcluded.

The simultaneous use of two orthogonal tRNA systems to incorporate twodifferent unnatural amino acids using the myoglobin model system isdemonstrated in FIG. 7B. This figure provides a western blot probed withan anti-His C-terminal antibody. Protein was expressed from a myoglobingene containing an AGGA codon at position 24 and a TAG codon at position75 (Myo24AGGA/75TAG) in the presence of both lysyl and tyrosylorthogonal pairs. hGln was incorporated by AGGA suppression at position24, and O-methyl-tyrosine (OMeTyr) was incorporated by amber suppressionat position 75 in a single polypeptide by using hGlnRS and OMeTyrRS. Asshown in the figure, a polypeptide is produced only when both unnaturalamino acids are present, and furthermore, only when both the lysyl andtyrosyl orthogonal systems are present.

The results observed in the western blots of FIGS. 7A and 7B are furtherconfirmed in analyses provided in FIGS. 8 and 9. FIG. 8 provides amatrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight analysis oftryptic fragments of the wildtype myoglobin (MyoWT; presumablycontaining lysine at position 24) and mutant myoglobin (24AGGA;presumably containing hGln) as produced in FIG. 7A. The analyses ofthese myoglobin species are shown in the upper and lower panels,respectively. The analysis revealed tryptic peptide fragments of thepurified protein revealed a peptide of mass 1,676.85 Da, consistent withthe predicted mass of 1676.88 Da. No evidence of peptides containinglysine (observed mass of 950.46 Da from the protein expressed withPhKRSΔ for the trypsin-cleaved peptide and calculated mass of 950.53 or1,661.91 Da for the full-length peptide) or glutamine at position 24(calculated mass, 1661.87 Da) was observed.

FIG. 9 provides an electrospray MS analysis of the full-length doublemutant protein (produced in FIG. 7B). The MS analysis revealed a mass of18,546.40 Ds (SD 0.11), consistent with the predicted mass of 18,546.60(SD 0.81) for myoglobin containing both unnatural amino acid, comparedwith the calculated mass of 18,518.3 Da for myoglobin with the G24K andA75Y substitutions.

In summary, we have demonstrated the use of frameshift suppression forthe site-specific incorporation of an unnatural amino acid in vivo.Furthermore, we have demonstrated the mutual orthogonality of this P.horikoshii-derived lysyl-tRNA synthetase and an orthogonal pair derivedfrom the M. jannaschii tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and shown that we can thesimultaneously incorporate two unnatural amino acids into a singlepolypeptide. It should be possible to identify synthetase variants thatpermit the incorporation of mutually-orthogonal reactive handles or evenfluorophore amino acids. With such materials, it is possible toincorporate a fluorophore pair into a polypeptide for FRET studies invivo. Similarly, it is possible to incorporate moieties other than aminoacids such as α-hydroxy acids for the ribosomal production of unnaturalpolymers. Additional codons such as CCCU or CUAG can be used, which areefficiently suppressed in E. coli. Alternatively, the genome of E. colicould be resynthesized with limited codon degeneracy thereby making upto 43 codons available for recoding.

Materials and Methods

Cloning and expression of synthetase genes: Genomic DNA was preparedfrom P. horikoshii obtained from the American Type Culture Collection(ATCC; #700860). PhKRS was amplified by PCR and cloned into the NcoI andEcoRI sites of plasmid pBAD/Myc-HisA (Invitrogen) for overexpression.For constitutive expression, the synthetase genes were cloned into pGLNand pKQ (Anderson and Schultz (2003) Adaptation of an OrthogonalArchaeal Leucyl-tRNA and Synthetase Pair for Four-base, Amber, and OpalSuppression. Biochemistry 42:9598-608) under the control of theglutamine promoter. These plasmids derived from pBAD/Myc-HisA conferresistance to ampicillin and kanamycin, respectively. Similarly, EcKRSwas cloned from the lysU locus of E. coli strain HB101. Protein wasoverexpressed in 2YT media by the protocol described for the QiagenQIAexpressionist kit and then dialyzed against 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5;100 mM NaCl; and 10% glycerol.

In vitro aminoacylation assays: Whole E. coli tRNA was purchased fromRoche and halobacterial tRNA was extracted from cultures ofHalobacterium sp. NRC-1 (ATCC; #700922) with the RNA/DNA Extraction Kit(Qiagen). Assays were performed in 20 μL reactions containing 50 mMTris-HCl, pH 7.5, 30 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl₂, 3 mM glutathione, 0.1 mg/mLBSA, 10 mM ATP, 1 μM [³H] lysine (Amersham), 750 nM synthetase, and 0,2, 10, or 40 μM whole tRNA at 37° C. for 20 minutes.

Complementation analysis: PALΔSAUTR(pMAKlysU) cells were transformedwith pGLN derivatives for expression of PhΔAD, EcKRS, or no synthetaseand rescued on LB-agar plates containing 50 μg/mL ampicillin at 30° C.Complementation at 43° C. of the synthetase-deficient growth defect ofstrain PALΔSΔUTR was done on LB agar plates or liquid media with noantibiotics. Growth in GeneHogs was used as a positive control toeliminate the possibility of toxic effects from synthetase expression.For liquid media, saturated cultures were diluted 10000-fold into freshmedia and growth was monitored at 600 nm for 8 hours.

Library construction: Genes for tRNAs were constructed by the overlapextension of synthetic oligonucleotides (Genosys) and subcloned into theEcoRI and PstI sites of pACKO-A184TAG or pACKO-A184AGGA. These reporterplasmids derived from pACYC184 contain the p15A origin of replication, achloramphenicol resistance gene, and a strong constitituve promotercontrolling expression of the tRNA genes. The PhΔAD-derived library wasconstructed in plasmid pKQ by EIPCR (Stemmer and Morris, S. K. (1992)Enzymatic inverse PCR: a restriction site independent, single-fragmentmethod for high-efficiency, site-directed mutagenesis. Biotechniques13:214-20). Premixed phosphoramidites were used during oligonucleotidesynthesis for library construction. Library diversity was 900-foldhigher than the theoretical diversity and shown to be free of sequencebias by sequencing.

Determination of suppression efficiency: Suppression efficiency wasdetermined by plating on LB-agar media supplemented with 25 μg/mLkanamycin and chloramphenicol and various concentrations of ampicillinbetween 5 and 1000 μg/mL. Cells were plated at densities below 100 cellsper plate. Efficiency was reported as the highest concentration at whichcells survived to form colonies among a series of plates for which thenext highest and lowest concentrations would be within 20% of thereported value.

Expression and characterization of myoglobin containing hGln: Forsingle-site incorporation experiments, pMyo-AK_(UCCU) was constructedwith a p15A origin of replication and genes for chloramphenicolacetyltransferase, AK_(UCCU), and sperm whale myoglobin. The myoglobingene was placed under the control the arabinose promoter and contains anAGGA codon at position G24. For two-site incorporation another plasmidwas constructed by introducing a TAG codon at position A74 of themyoglobin gene in pMyo-AK_(UCCU). The orthogonal tRNA^(Tyr), J17, wasadded under the control of a second Ipp promoter. Synthetases hGlnRS andAzPheRS were expressed from plasmid pKQ under independent glutaminepromoters. GeneHogs cells harboring appropriate synthetase and myoglobinexpression plasmids were grown at 37° C. to OD₆₀₀=0.7 in GMML mediasupplemented with the 19 amino acids except lysine at 0.4 mg/ml each,vitamins and 1 mg/ml hGln (Sigma), induced with 0.02% arabinose, andthen grown to saturation. Cells were lysed by sonication, and myoglobinwas purified with the Qiagen QIAexpressionist kit. MALDI-MS analysis oftryptic fragments was performed at the TSR1 Proteomics Facility.

Example 4 Exemplary Lysyl O-RSs and Lysyl O-tRNAs

Exemplary O-tRNAs are found in the examples and/or Table 1. ExemplaryO-RSs are also found in the examples and/or Table 1. Exemplarypolynucleotides that encode O-RSs or portions thereof include thosefound in the examples and/or Table 1.

Further details of the invention, and in particular experimentaldetails, can be found in Anderson, John Christopher, “PathwayEngineering of the Expanding Genetic Code,” Ph.D. Dissertation, TheScripps Research Institute [2003].

It is understood that the examples and embodiments described herein arefor illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changesin light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and areto be included within the spirit and purview of this application andscope of the appended claims.

While the foregoing invention has been described in some detail forpurposes of clarity and understanding, it will be clear to one skilledin the art from a reading of this disclosure that various changes inform and detail can be made without departing from the true scope of theinvention. For example, all the techniques and apparatus described abovecan be used in various combinations. All publications, patents, patentapplications, and/or other documents cited in this application areincorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes to the sameextent as if each individual publication, patent, patent application,and/or other document were individually indicated to be incorporated byreference for all purposes. TABLE 1 SEQ ID: Label SEQUENCE SEQ ID:1 Pa15GGGCCGGUAGCUUAGCCUGGUUAGAGCGGCGGACUCUUAAUC tcCGCAGGUCGGGGGUUCAAAUCCCCCCCGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:2 Pf32GGGCCGGUAGCUUAGCCUGGUUAGAGCGGCGGACUCUUAAUCCGCAGGUCGGGGGUUCAAAUCCCCCCCGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:3 Ph36GGGCCGGUAGCUUAGCCUGGUUAGAGCGGCGGACUCUUAAUCCGCAGGUCGGGGGUUCAAAUCCCCCCCGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:4 Pa34GGGCCGGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUCAGAGCACCGGGCUUUUAACCCGGUGGUCGCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGCCCGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:5 Ph9GGGCCGGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUCAGAGCACCGGGCUUUUAACCCGGUGGUCGCGGGUCAAAUCCCGCCCGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:6 Pf4GGGCCGGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUUAGAGCACCGGGCUUUUAACCCGGUGGUCGCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGCCCGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:7 Pya26GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCCGGUUAGAGCGGCGGGCUUUUAACCCGUAGGUCGUGGGUUCGAAUCCCACCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:8 Ta1GGGUCCGUAGCUUAGCUAGGUAGAGCGCUGGACUCUUAAUCCAUAGGUCAGGGGUCCAAAUCCCCUCGGACCCGCCA SEQ ID:9 Tv40GGGUCCGUAGCUUAGCUAGGUAGAGCGAUGGACUCUUAAUCCAUAGGUCAGGGGUCCAAAUCCCCUCGGACCCGCCA SEQ ID:10 Af18GGGCCGGUAGCUUAGCCAGGCAGAGCGCGGGACUCUUAAUCCCGCAGUCGGGGGUUCAAAUCCCUCCCGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:11 Hh1GGGCCGGUAGCUCAGUCUGGCAGAGCGACGGACUCUUAAUCCGUCGGUCGCGUGUUCAAAUCGCGCCCGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:12 Ta5GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCAGGUAGAGCAUCUGGCUUUUAACCAGGUGGUCAGGGGUUCGAACCCCCUCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:13 Tv24GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCAGGUAGAGCAUCUGGCUUUUAACCAGGUGGUCAGGGGUUCGAACCCCCUCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:14 Mj21GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGUCUGGCAGAGCGCCUGGCUUUUAACCAGGUGGUCGAGGGUUCAAAUCCCUUCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:15 Mt15GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGUCUGGCAGAGCGCUUGGCUUUUAACCAAGUGGUCGCGGGUUCAAUUCCCGUCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:16 Mm4GGGCCCGUAGCUUAGUCUGGUAGAGCGCCUGACUUUUAAUCAGGCGGUCGAGGGUUCGAAUCCCUUCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:17 St1GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCAGGUAGAGCGGCGGGCUCUUAACCCGUAGGUCCCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGGCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:18 St43GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCAGGUAGAGCGGCGGGCUUUUAACCCGUAGGUCCCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGGCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:19 Pya13GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUAGAGCGGCGGGCUCUUAACCCGUAGGUCGUGGGUUCGAAUCCCACCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:20 Af15GGGCUCGUAGCUCAGCCAGGCAGAGCGACGGGCUUUUAACCCGUCGGUCGCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGUCGAGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:21 Ss43GGGCCCGUAGCUUAGCCAGGUAGAGCUACGGGCUCUUAACCCGUAGUCCCGGGUUCGAAUCCCGGCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:22 Ap47GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUAGAGCGGCGGGCUCUUACCCCGCGGAAGUCCCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGGCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:23 ConsensusGGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUUAGAGCGGCGGGCA-UUAACC-CGGAGGUCGCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGCCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:24 AK_(CUA)GGGCCCGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUAGAGCGGCGGGCUCUAAACCCGCAGGUCGCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGCCGGGCCCGCCA SEQ ID:25 AK_(stemlibrary)NNNNCCGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUAGAGCGGCGGGCUUCCUAACCCGCAGGUCGCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGCCGGNNNNGCCA SEQ ID:26 AK_(UCCU)UGGUCCGUAGCUCAGCCUGGUAGAGCGGCGGGCUUCCUCACCCGCAGGUCGCGGGUUCAAAUCCCGCCGGACUAGCCA SEQ ID:27 PhΔAD ATGGTTCATT GGGCCGATTATATTGctgat aaaataatta gagagagggg ggagaaggag aagtacgttg ttgagagtggaataacgcca agtggttacg ttcacgttgg gaactttagg gagcttttta cagcttatattgtgggccat gccctaaggg ataaggggta tgaggttagg cacatccaca tgtgggatgattatgataga tttaggaagg ttccaaggaa cgttccccag gaatggaaag attacctgggaatgcccatt agtgaagttc ctgatccctg gggatgccat gagagttatg ctgaacacttcatgagaaag ttcgaggagg aggtagaaaa attagggatc gaagttgact ttctttatgcgagtgaactc tacaagagag gggaatattc tgaggagata aggttagcct ttgagaaaagggataagata atggagatac taaacaagta tagggaaatt gcgaaacaac ctccccttccagagaactgg tggcccgcaa tggtttactg ccctgagcat aggagggaag cagagatcattgaatgggat gggggctgga aggttaagta taagtgcccc gaaggtcacg agggatgggttgatataagg agtgggaacg tgaaactgag gtggcgtgtt gattggccca tgcgttggtctcactttggc gttgacttcg aacctgctgg aaaggatcat cttgtggctg gttcaagctacgatacggga aaggagatta taaaggaagt ttatggaaag gaagctccgt tatctttaatgtatgagttt gttggaatta aggggcagaa ggggaagatg agtggtagta agggaaatgttattttactc agcgatctgt atgaggttct tgagccaggt ctcgttagat ttatctacgctcggcatagg ccaaacaagg agataaagat agatctaggt cttggcattc taaacctctacgatgagttc gataaagttg agagaatata cttcggggtt gagggtggta aaggtgatgatgaagaatta aggaggactt acgagctttc gGTGATGCTG CCAACTTACT GA SEQ ID:28PhΔAD. MVHWADYIAD KITRERGEKE KYVVESGITP SGYVHVGNFR ELFTAYIVGH pepALRDKGYEVR HIHMWDDYDR FRKVPRNVPQ EWKDYLGMPI SEVPDPWGCH ESYAEHFMRKFEEEVEKLGI EVDFLYASEL YKRGEYSEEI RLAFEKRDKI MEILNKYREI AKQPPLPENWWPAMVYCPEH RREAEIIEWD GGWKVKYKCP EGHEGWVDIR SGNVKLRWRV DWPMRWSHFGVDFEPAGKDH LVAGSSYDTG KEIIKEVYGK EAPLSLMYEF VGIKGQKGKM SGSKGNVILLSDLYEVLEPG LVRFIYARHR PNKEIKIDLG LGILNLYDEF DKVERIYFGV EGGKGDDEELRRTYELSVML PTY* SEQ ID:29 PhE444G atggttcatt gggccgatta tattgctgataaaataatta gagagagggg also known ggagaaggag aagtacgttg ttgagagtggaataacgcca agtggttacg as PhKRS ttcacgttgg gaactttagg gagctttttacagcttatat tgtgggccat gccctaaggg ataaggggta tgaggttagg cacatccacatgtgggatga ttatgataga tttaggaagg ttccaaggaa cgttccccag gaatggaaagattacctggg aatgcccatt agtgaagttc ctgatccctg gggatgccat gagagttatgctgaacactt catgagaaag ttcgaggagg aggtagaaaa attagggatc gaagttgactttctttatgc gagtgaactc tacaagagag gggaatattc tgaggagata aggttagcctttgagaaaag ggataagata atggagatac taaacaagta tagggaaatt gcgaaacaacctccccttcc agagaactgg tggcccgcaa tggtttactg ccctgagcat aggagggaagcagagatcat tgaatgggat gggggctgga aggttaagta taagtgcccc gaaggtcacgagggatgggt tgatataagg agtgggaacg tgaaactgag gtggcgtgtt gattggcccatgcgttggtc tcactttggc gttgacttcg aacctgctgg aaaggatcat cttgtggctggttcaagcta cgatacggga aaggagatta taaaggaagt ttatggaaag gaagctccgttatctttaat gtatgagttt gttggaatta aggggcagaa ggggaagatg agtggtagtaagggaaatgt tattttactc agcgatctgt atgaggttct tgagccaggt ctcgttagatttatctacgc tcggcatagg ccaaacaagg agataaagat agatctaggt cttggcattctaaacctcta cgatgagttc gataaagttg agagaatata cttcggggtt gagggtggtaaaggtgatga tgaagaatta aggaggactt acgagctttc aatgcctaag aagcctgagagattagtcgc tcaagctcct tttaggttcc tagcggtgtt ggttcagtta ccgcatttaaccgaagaaga cataataaat gttctaatca aacagggaca tattcccagg gatctatccaaggaggacgt tgagagggtt aaacttagga taaaccttgc taggaattgg gttaaaaagtatgcccctga ggatgttaaa ttctcaatac ttgagaaacc tccagaagtt gaggtaagtgGagatgttag ggaggccatg aatgaggttg ctgagtggct tgagaatcat gaggaatttagcgttgaaga gtttaataac attctattcg aagttgccaa gaggaggggg atatccagtagggagtggtt ttcgacgctc tacagattat ttattggaaa ggaaagggga ccgagattggccagtttcct ggcatctctt gataggagtt tcgttattaa acgacttaga cttgagggat ag SEQID:30 PhE444G. MVHWADYIAD KIIRERGEKE KYVVESGITP SGYVHVGNFR ELFTAYIVGHpep ALRDKGYEVR HIHMWDDYDR FRKVPRNVPQ EWKDYLGMPI SEVPDPWGCH also knownESYAEHFMRK FEEEVEKLGI EVDFLYASEL YKRGEYSEEI RLAFEKRDKI as PhKRSMEILNXYREI AKQPPLPENW WPAMVYCPEH RREAEIIEWD GGWKVKYKCP EGHEGWVDIRSGNVKLRWRV DWPMRWSHFG VDFEPAGKDH LVAGSSYDTG KEIIKEVYGK EAPLSLMYEFVGIKGQKGKM SGSKGNVILL SDLYEVLEPG LVRFIYARRR PNKEIKIDLG LGILNLYDEFDKVERIYFGV EGGKGDDEEL RRTYELSMPK KPERLVAQAP FRFLAVLVQL PHLTEEDIINVLIKQGHIPR DLSKEDVERV KLRINLARNW VKKYAPEDVK FSILEKPPEV EVSGDVREAMNEVAEWLENH EEFSVEEFNN ILFEVAXRRG ISSREWFSTL YRLFIGKERG PRIASFLASLDRSFVIKRLR LEG* SEQ ID:31 pACKO- gaactccgga tgagcattca tcaggcgggcaagaatgtga ataaaggccg A184TAG gataaaactt gtgcttattt ttctttacggtctttaaaaa ggccgtaata tccagctgaa cggtctggtt ataggtacat tgagcaactgactgaaatgc ctcaaaatgt tctttacgat gccattggga tatatcaacg gtggtatatccagtgatttt tttctccatt ttagcttcct tagctcctga aaatctcgat aactcaaaaaatacgcccgg tagtgatctt atttcattat ggtgaaagtt ggaacctctt acgtgccgatcaacgtctca ttttcgccaa aagttggccc agggcttccc ggtatcaaca gggacaccaggatttattta ttctgcgaag tgatcttccg tcacaggtat ttattcggcg caaagtgcgtcgggtgatgc tgccaactta ctgatttagt gtatgatggt gtttttgagg tgctccagtggcttctgttt ctatcagctg tccctcctgt tcagctactg acggggtggt gcgtaacggcaaaagcaccg ccggacatca gcgctagcgg agtgtatact ggcttactat gttggcactgatgagggtgt cagtgaagtg cttcatgtgg caggagaaaa aaggctgcac cggtgcgtcagcagaatatg tgatacagga tatattccgc ttcctcgctc actgactcgc tacgctcggtcgttcgactg cggcgagcgg aaatggctta cgaacggggc ggagatttcc tggaagatgccaggaagata cttaacaggg aagtgagagg gccgcggcaa agccgttttt ccataggctccgcccccctg acaagcatca cgaaatctga cgctcaaatc agtggtggcg aaacccgacaggactataaa gataccaggc gtttccccct ggcggctccc tcgtgcgctc tcctgttcctgcctttcggt ttaccggtgt cattccgctg ttatggccgc gtttgtctca ttccacgcctgacactcagt tccgggtagg cagttcgctc caagctggac tgtatgcacg aaccccccgttcagtccgac cgctgcgcct tatccggtaa ctatcgtctt gagtccaacc cggaaagacatgcaaaagca ccactggcag cagccactgg taattgattt agaggagtta gtcttgaagtcatgcgccgg ttaaggctaa actgaaagga caagttttgg tgactgcgct cctccaagccagttacctcg gttcaaagag ttggtagctc agagaacctt cgaaaaaccg ccctgcaaggcggttttttc gttttcagag caagagatta cgcgcagacc aaaacgatct caagaagatcatcttattaa tcagataaaa tatttctaga tttcagtgca atttatctct tcaaatgtagcacctgaagt cagccccata cgatataagt tgtaattctc atgtttgaca gcttatcatcgataagcttt aatgcggtag tttatcacag ttaaattgct aacgcagtca ggcaccgtgtatgaaatcta acaatgcgct catcgtcatc ctcggcaccg tcaccctgga tgctgtaggcataggcttgg ttatgccggt actgccgggc ctcttgcggg atatcGGTTT CTTAGACGTCAGGTGGCACT TTtcggggaa atgtgcgcgg aacccctatt tgtttatttt tctaaatacattcaaatatg tatccgctca tgagacaata accctgataa atgcttcaat aatattgaaaaaggaagagt atgagtattc aacatttccg tgtcgccctt attccctttt ttgcggcattttgccttcct gtttttgctc acccagaaac gctggtgaaa gtaaaagatg ctgaagatcagttgggtgca cgagtgggtt acatcgaact ggatctcaac agcggtaaga tccttgagagttttcgcccc gaagaacgtt ttccaatgat gagcactttt aaagttctgc tatgtggcgcggtattatcc cgtgttgacg ccgggcaaga gcaactcggt cgccgcatac actattctcagaatgacttg gttgagtact caccagtcac agaaaagcat cttacggatg gcatgacagtaagagaatta tgcagtgctg ccataaccat gagtgataac actgcggcca acttacttctgacaacgatc ggaggaccga aggagctaac cgcttttttg cacaacatgg gggatcatgtaactcgcctt gatcgttggg aaccggagct gaatgaagcc ataccaaacg acgagcgtgacaccacgatg cctTAGgcaa tggcaacaac gttgcgcaaa ctattaactg gcgaactacttactctagct tcccggcaac aattaataga ctggatggag gcggataaag ttgcaggaccacttctgcgc tcggcccttc cggctggctg gtttattgct gataaatctg gagccggtgagcgtgggtct cgcggtatca ttgcagcact ggggccagat ggtaagccct cccgtatcgtagttatctac acgacgggga gtcaggcaac tatggatgaa cgaaatagac agatcgctgagataggtgcc tcactgatta agcattggca ccaccaccac caccactaaC CCGGGACCAAGTTTACTCAT ATATACttta gattgattta aaacttcatt tttaatttaa aaggatctaggtgaagatcc tttttgataa tCTCATGACC AAAATCCCTT AACGgcatgc accattccttgcggcggcgg tgctcaacgg cctcaaccta ctactGGGCT GCTTCCTAAT GCAGGAGTCGCATAAGGCAG AGCGTCTGGC GAAAGGGGGA TGTGCTGCAA GGCGATTAAG TTGGGTAACGCCAGGGTTTT CCCAGTCACG ACGTTGTAAA ACQACCOCCA GTGCCAAGCT TAAAAAaaatccttagcttt cgctaaggat CTGCACTTAT AATCTCTTTC TAATTGCCTC TAAAATCTTTATAAGTTCTT CAGCTACAGC ATTTTTTAAA TCCATTGGAT GCAATTCCTT ATTTTTAAATAAACTCTCTA ACTCCTCATA GCTATTAACT GTCAAATCTC CACCAAATTT TTCTGGCCTTTTTATGGTTA AAGGATATTC AAGCAAGTAT TTAGCTATCT CCATTATTGG ATTTCCTTCAACAACTCCAG CTCGGCAGTA TGCTTTCTTT ATCTTAGCCC TAATCTCTTC TCGAGAGTCATCAACAGCTA TAAAATTCCC TTTTGAAGAA CTCATCTTTC CTTCTCCATC CAAACCCGTTAAGACAGGGT TGTGAATACA AACAACCTTT TTTGGTAAAA GCTCCCTTGC TAACATGTGTATTTTTCTCT GCTCCATCCC TCCAACTGCA ACATCAACGC CTAAATAATG AATATCATTAACCTGCATTA TTGGATAGAT AACTTCAGCA ACCTTTGGAT TTTCATCCTC TCTTGCTATAAGTTCCATAC TCCTTCTTGC TCTTTTTAAG GTAGTTTTTA AAGCCAATCT ATAGACATTCAGTGTATAAT CCTTATCAAG CTGGAATTCa gcgttacaag tattacacaa agttttttatgttgagaata tttttttgat ggggcgccac ttatttttga tcgttcgctc aaagAAGCGGCGCCAGGGNT GTTTTTCTTT TCACCAGTNA GACGGGCAAC AGAACCCCAT Gagcggcctcatttcttatt ctgagttaca acagtccgca ccgctgtccg gtagctcctt ccggtgggcgcggggcatga ctatcgtcgc cgcacttatg actgtcttct ttatcatgca actcgtaggacaggtgccgg cagcgcccaa cagtcccccg gccacggggc ctgccaccat acccacgccgaaacaagcgc cctgcaccat tatgttccgg atctgcatcg caggatgctg ctggctaccctgtggaacac ctacatctgt attaacgaag cgctaaccgt ttttatcagg ctctgggaggcagaataaat gatcatatcg tcaattatta cctccacggg gagagcctga gcaaactggcctcaggcatt tgagaagcac acggtcacac tgcttccggt agtcaataaa ccggtaaaccagcaatagac ataagcggct atttaacgac cctgccctga accgacgacc gggtcgaatttgctttcgaa tttctgccat tcatccgctt attatcactt attcaggcgt agcaccaggcgtttaagggc accaataact gccttaaaaa aattacgccc cgccctgcca ctcatcgcagtactgttgta attcattaag cattctgccg acatggaagc catcacagac ggcatgatgaacctgaatcg ccagcggcat cagcaccttg tcgccttgcg tataatattt gcccatggtgaaaacggggg cgaagaagtt gtccatattg gccacgttta aatcaaaact ggtgaaactcacccagggat tggctgagac gaaaaacata ttctcaataa accctttagg gaaataggcCaggttttcac cgtaacacgc cacatcttgc gaatatatgt gtagaaactg ccggaaatcgtcgtggtatt cactccagag cgatgaaaac gtttcagttt gctcatggaa aacggtgtaacaagggtgaa cactatccca tatcaccagc tcaccgtctt tcattgccat acg SEQ ID:32pACKO- gaactccgga tgagcattca tcaggcgggc aagaatgtga ataaaggccg A184AGGAgataaaactt gtgcttattt ttctttacgg tctttaaaaa ggccgtaata tccagctgaacggtctggtt ataggtacat tgagcaactg actgaaatgc ctcaaaatgt tctttacgatgccattggga tatatcaacg gtggtatatc cagtgatttt tttctccatt ttagcttccttagctcctga aaatctcgat aactcaaaaa atacgcccgg tagtgatctt atttcattatggtgaaagtt ggaacctctt acgtgccgat caacgtctca ttttcgccaa aagttggcccagggcttccc ggtatcaaca gggacaccag gatttattta ttctgcgaag tgatcttccgtcacaggtat ttattcggcg caaagtgcgt cgggtgatgc tgccaactta ctgatttagtgtatgatggt gtttttgagg tgctccagtg gcttctgttt ctatcagctg tccctcctgttcagctactg acggggtggt gcgtaacggc aaaagcaccg ccggacatca gcgctagcggagtgtatact ggcttactat gttggcactg atgagggtgt cagtgaagtg cttcatgtggcaggagaaaa aaggctgcac cggtgcgtca gcagaatatg tgatacagga tatattccgcttcctcgctc actgactcgc tacgctcggt cgttcgactg cggcgagcgg aaatggcttacgaacggggc ggagatttcc tggaagatgc caggaagata cttaacaggg aagtgagagggccgcggcaa agccgttttt ccataggctc cgcccccctg acaagcatca cgaaatctgacgctcaaatc agtggtggcg aaacccgaca ggactataaa gataccaggc gtttccccctggcggctccc tcgtgcgctc tcctgttcct gcctttcggt ttaccggtgt cattccgctgttatggccgc gtttgtctca ttccacgcct gacactcagt tccgggtagg cagttcgctccaagctggac tgtatgcacg aaccccccgt tcagtccgac cgctgcgcct tatccggtaactatcgtctt gagtccaacc cggaaagaca tgcaaaagca ccactggcag cagccactggtaattgattt agaggagtta gtcttgaagt catgcgccgg ttaaggctaa actgaaaggacaagttttgg tgactgcgct cctccaagcc agttacctcg gttcaaagag ttggtagctcagagaacctt cgaaaaaccg ccctgcaagg cggttttttc gttttcagag caagagattacgcgcagacc aaaacgatct caagaagatc atcttattaa tcagataaaa tatttctagatttcagtgca atttatctct tcaaatgtag cacctgaagt cagccccata cgatataagttgtaattctc atgtttgaca gcttatcatc gataagcttt aatgcggtag tttatcacagttaaattgct aacgcagtca ggcaccgtgt atgaaatcta acaatgcgct catcgtcatcctcggcaccg tcaccctgga tgctgtaggc ataggcttgg ttatgccggt actgccgggcctcttgcggg atatcGGTTT CTTAGACGTC AGGTGGCACT TTtcggggaa atgtgcgcggaacccctatt tgtttatttt tctaaataca ttcaaatatg tatccgctca tgagacaataaccctgataa atgcttcaat aatattgaaa aaggaagagt atgagtattc aacatttccgtgtcgccctt attccctttt ttgcggcatt ttgccttcct gtttttgctc acccagaaacgctggtgaaa gtaaaagatg ctgaagatca gttgggtgca cgagtgggtt acatcgaactggatctcaac agcggtaaga tccttgagag ttttcgcccc gaagaacgtt ttccaatgatgagcactttt aaagttctgc tatgtggcgc ggtattatcc cgtgttgacg ccgggcaagagcaactcggt cgccgcatac actattctca gaatgacttg gttgagtact caccagtcacagaaaagcat cttacggatg gcatgacagt aagagaatta tgcagtgctg ccataaccatgagtgataac actgcggcca acttacttct gacaacgatc ggaggaccga aggagctaaccgcttttttg cacaacatgg gggatcatgt aactcgcctt gatcgttggg aaccggagctgaatgaagcc ataccaaacg acgagcgtga caccacgatg cctAGGAgca atggcaacaacgttgcgcaa actattaact ggcgaactac ttactctagc ttcccggcaa caattaatagactggatgga ggcggataaa gttgcaggac cacttctgcg ctcggccctt ccggctggctggtttattgc tgataaatct ggagccggtg agcgtgggtc tcgcggtatc attgcagcactggggccaga tggtaagccc tcccgtatcg tagttatcta cacgacgggg agtcaggcaactatggatga acgaaataga cagatcgctg agataggtgc ctcactgatt aagcattggcaccaccacca ccaccactaa CCCGGGACCA AGTTTACTCA TATATACttt agattgatttaaaacttcat ttttaattta aaaggatcta ggtgaagatc ctttttgata atCTCATGACCAAAATCCCT TAACGgcatg caccattcct tgcggcggcg gtgctcaacg gcctcaacctactactGGGC TGCTTCCTAA TGCAGGAGTC GCATAAGGGA GAGCGTCTGG CGAAAGGGGGATGTGCTGCA AGGCGATTAA GTTGGGTAAC GCCAGGGTTT TCCCAGTCAC GACGTTGTAAAACGACGGCC AGTGCCAAGC TTAAAAAaaa tccttagctt tcgctaagga tCTGCAGTTATAATCTCTTT CTAATTGGCT CTAAAATCTT TATAAGTTCT TCAGCTACAG CATTTTTTAAATCCATTGGA TGCAATTCCT TATTTTTAAA TAAACTCTCT AACTCCTCAT AGCTATTAACTGTCAAATCT CCACCAAATT TTTCTGGCCT TTTTATGGTT AAAGGATATT CAAGGAAGTATTTAGCTATC TCCATTATTG GATTTCCTTC AACAACTCCA GCTGGGCAGT ATGCTTTCTTTATCTTAGCC CTAATCTCTT CTGGAGAGTC ATCAACAGCT ATAAAATTCC CTTTTGAAGAACTCATCTTT CCTTCTCCAT CCAAACCCGT TAAGACAGGG TTGTGAATAC AAACAACCTTTTTTGGTAAA AGCTCCCTTG CTAACATGTG TATTTTTCTC TGCTCCATCC CTCCAACTGCAACATCAACG CCTAAATAAT GAATATCATT AACCTGCATT ATTGGATAGA TAACTTCAGCAACCTTTGGA TTTTCATCCT CTCTTGCTAT AAGTTCCATA CTCCTTCTTG CTCTTTTTAAGGTAGTTTTT AAAGCCAATC TATAGACATT CAGTGTATAA TCCTTATCAA GCTGGAATTCagcgttacaa gtattacaca aagtttttta tgttgagaat atttttttga tggggcgccacttatttttg atcgttcgct caaagAAGCG GCGCCAGGGN TGTTTTTCTT TTCACCAGTNAGACGGGCAA CAGAACGCCA TGAgcggcct catttcttat tctgagttac aacagtccgcaccgctgtcc ggtagctcct tccggtgggc gcggggcatg actatcgtcg ccgcacttatgactgtcttc tttatcatgc aactcgtagg acaggtgccg gcagcgccca acagtcccccggccacgggg cctgccacca tacccacgcc gaaacaagcg ccctgcacca ttatgttccggatctgcatc gcaggatgct gctggctacc ctgtggaaca cctacatctg tattaacgaagcgctaaccg tttttatcag gctctgggag gcagaataaa tgatcatatc gtcaattattacctccacgg ggagagcctg agcaaactgg cctcaggcat ttgagaagca cacggtcacactgcttccgg tagtcaataa accggtaaac cagcaataga cataagcggc tatttaacgaccctgccctg aaccgacgac cgggtcgaat ttgctttcga atttctgcca ttcatccgcttattatcact tattcaggcg tagcaccagg cgtttaaggg caccaataac tgccttaaaaaaattacgcc ccgccctgcc actcatcgca gtactgttgt aattcattaa gcattctgccgacatggaag ccatcacaga cggcatgatg aacctgaatc gccagcggca tcagcaccttgtcgccttgc gtataatatt tgcccatggt gaaaacgggg gcgaagaagt tgtccatattggccacgttt aaatcaaaac tggtgaaact cacccaggga ttggctgaga cgaaaaacatattctcaata aaccctttag ggaaataggc caggttttca ccgtaacacg ccacatcttgcgaatatatg tgtagaaact gccggaaatc gtcgtggtat tcactccaga gcgatgaaaacgtttcagtt tgctcatgga aaacggtgta acaagggtga acactatccc atatcaccagctcaccgtct ttcattgcca tacg SEQ ID:33 pACKO- gaactccgga tgagcattcatcaggcgggc aagaatgtga ataaaggccg Bla gataaaactt gtgcttattt ttctttacggtctttaaaaa ggccgtaata tccagctgaa cggtctggtt ataggtacat tgagcaactgactgaaatgc ctcaaaatgt tctttacgat gccattggga tatatcaacg gtggtatatccagtgatttt tttctccatt ttagcttcct tagctcctga aaatctcgat aactcaaaaaatacgcccgg tagtgatctt atttcattat ggtgaaagtt ggaacctctt acgtgccgatcaacgtctca ttttcgccaa aagttggccc agggcttccc ggtatcaaca gggacaccaggatttattta ttctgcgaag tgatcttccg tcacaggtat ttattcggcg caaagtgcgtcgggtgatgc tgccaactta ctgatttagt gtatgatggt gtttttgagg tgctccagtggcttctgttt ctatcagctg tccctcctgt tcagctactg acggggtggt gcgtaacggcaaaagcaccg ccggacatca gcgctagcgg agtgtatact ggcttactat gttggcactgatgagggtgt cagtgaagtg cttcatgtgg caggagaaaa aaggctgcac cggtgcgtcagcagaatatg tgatacagga tatattccgc ttcctcgctc actgactcgc tacgctcggtcgttcgactg cggcgagcgg aaatggctta cgaacggggc ggagatttcc tggaagatgccaggaagata cttaacaggg aagtgagagg gccgcggcaa agccgttttt ccataggctccgcccccctg acaagcatca cgaaatctga cgctcaaatc agtggtggcg aaacccgacaggactataaa gataccaggc gtttccccct ggcggctCCC tcgtgcgctc tcctgttcctgcctttcggt ttaccggtgt cattccgctg ttatggccgc gtttgtctca ttccacgcctgacactcagt tccgggtagg cagttcgctc caagctggac tgtatgcacg aaccccccgttcagtccgac cgctgcgcct tatccggtaa ctatcgtctt gagtccaacc cggaaagacatgcaaaagca ccactggcag cagccactgg taattgattt agaggagtta gtcttgaagtcatgcgccgg ttaaggctaa actgaaagga caagttttgg tgactgcgct cctccaagccagttacctcg gttcaaagag ttggtagctc agagaacctt cgaaaaaccg ccctgcaaggcggttttttc gttttcagag caagagatta cgcgcagacc aaaacgatct caagaagatcatcttattaa tcagataaaa tatttctaga tttcagtgca atttatctct tcaaatgtagcacctgaagt cagccccata cgatataagt tgtaattctc atgtttgaca gcttatcatcgataagcttt aatgcggtag tttatcacag ttaaattgct aacgcagtca ggcaccgtgtatgaaatcta acaatgcgct catcgtcatc ctcggcaccg tcaccctgga tgctgtaggcataggcttgg ttatgccggt actgccgggc ctcttgcggg atatcGGTTT CTTAGACGTCAGGTGGCact tttcggggaa atgtgcgcgg aacccctatt tgtttatttt tctaaatacattcaaatatg tatccgctca tgagacaata accctgataa atgcttcaat aatattgaaaaaggaagagt atgagtattc aacatttccg tgtcgccctt attccctttt ttgcggcattttgccttCCT GTTTTTGCTC ACCCAGAAAC ACTAGtgcag caatggcaac aacgttgcgcaaactattaa ctggcgaact acttactcta gcttcccggc aacaattaat agactggatggaggcggata aagttgcagg accacttctg cgctcggccc ttccggctgg ctggtttattgctgataaat ctggagccgg tgagcgtggg tctcgcggta tcattgcagc actggggccagatggtaagc cctcccgtat cgtagttatc tacacgacgg ggagtcaggc aactatggatgaacgaaata gacagatcgc tgagataggt gcctCACTGA TTAAGCATTG GTAACCCGGGACCAAGTTTA CTCATATATA Ctttagattg atttaaaact tcatttttaa tttaaaaggatctaggtgaa gatccttttt gataatCTCA TGACCAAAAT CCCTTAACGg catgcaccattccttgcggc ggcggtgctc aacggcctca acctactact GGGCTGCTTC CTAATGCAGGAGTCGCATAA GGGAGAGCGT CTGGCGAAAG GGGGATGTGC TGCAAGGCGA TTAAGTTGGGTAACGCCAGG GTTTTCCCAG TCACGACGTT GTAAAACGAC GGCCAGTGCC AAGCTTAAAAAaaatcctta gctttcgcta aggatCTGCA GTTATAATCT CTTTCTAATT GGCTCTAAAATCTTTATAAG TTCTTCAGCT ACAGCATTTT TTAAATCCAT TGGATGCAAT TCCTTATTTTTAAATAAACT CTCTAACTCC TCATAGCTAT TAACTGTCAA ATCTCCACCA AATTTTTCTGGCCTTTTTAT GGTTAAAGGA TATTCAAGGA AGTATTTAGC TATCTCCATT ATTGGATTTCCTTCAACAAC TCCAGCTGGG CAGTATGCTT TCTTTATCTT AGCCCTAATC TCTTCTGGAGAGTCATCAAC AGCTATAAAA TTCCCTTTTG AAGAACTCAT CTTTCCTTCT CCATCCAAACCCGTTAAGAC AGGGTTGTGA ATACAAACAA CCTTTTTTGG TAAAAGCTCC CTTGCTAACATGTGTATTTT TCTCTGCTCC ATCCCTCCAA CTGCAACATC AACGCCTAAA TAATGAATATCATTAACCTG CATTATTGGA TAGATAACTT CAGCAACCTT TGGATTTTCA TCCTCTCTTGCTATAAGTTC CATACTCCTT CTTGCTCTTT TTAAGGTAGT TTTTAAAGCC AATCTATAGACATTCAGTGT ATAATCCTTA TCAAGCTGGA ATTCagcgtt acaagtatta cacaaagttttttatgttga gaatattttt ttgatggggc gccacttatt tttgatcgtt cgctcaaagAAGCGGCGCCA GGGNTGTTTT TCTTTTCACC AGTNAGACGG GCAACAGAAC GCCATGAgcggcctcatttc ttattctgag ttacaacagt ccgcaccgct gtccggtagc tccttccggtgggcgcgggg catgactatc gtcgccgcac ttatgactgt cttctttatc atgcaactcgtaggacaggt gccggcagcg cccaacagtc ccccggccac ggggcctgcc accatacccacgccgaaaca agcgccctgc accattatgt tccggatctg catcgcagga tgctgctggctaccctgtgg aacacctaca tctgtattaa cgaagcgcta accgttttta tcaggctctgggaggcagaa taaatgatca tatcgtcaat tattacctcc acggggagag cctgagcaaactggcctcag gcatttgaga agcacacggt cacactgctt ccggtagtca ataaaccggtaaaccagcaa tagacataag cggctattta acgaccctgc cctgaaccga cgaccgggtcgaatttgctt tcgaatttct gccattcatc cgcttattat cacttattca ggcgtagcaccaggcgttta agggcaccaa taactgcctt aaaaaaatta cgccccgccc tgccactcatcgcagtactg ttgtaattca ttaagcattc tgccgacatg gaagccatca cagacggcatgatgaacctg aatcgccagc ggcatcagca ccttgtcgcc ttgcgtataa tatttgcccatggtgaaaac gggggcgaag aagttgtcca tattggccac gtttaaatca aaactggtgaaactcaccca gggattggct gagacgaaaa acatattctc aataaaccct ttagggaaataggccaggtt ttcaccgtaa cacgccacat cttgcgaata tatgtgtaga aactgccggaaatcgtcgtg gtattcactc cagagcgatg aaaacgtttc agtttgctca tggaaaacggtgtaacaagg gtgaacacta tcccatatca ccagctcacc gtctttcatt gccatacg SEQID:34 pKQ ATGGATCCGA GCTCGAGATC TGCAGCTGGT ACCATATGGG AATTCGAAGCTTGGGCCCGA ACAAAAACTC ATCTCAGAAG AGGATCTGAA TAGCGCCGTC GACCATCATCATCATCATCA TTGAGTTTAA ACGGTCTCCA GCTTGGCTGT TTTGGCGGAT GAGAGAAGATTTTCAGCCTG ATACAGATTA AATCAGAACG CAGAAGCGGT CTGATAAAAC AGAATTTGCCTGGCGGCAGT AGCGCGGTGG TCCCACCTGA CCCCATGCCG AACTCAGAAG TGAAACGCCGTAGCGCCGAT GGTAGTGTGG GGTCTCCCCA TGCGAGAGTA GGGAACTGCC AGGCATCAAATAAAACGAAA GGCTCAGTCG AAAGACTGGG CCTTTCGTTT TATCTGTTGT TTGTCGGTGAACGATATCTG CTTTTCTTCG CGAATtaatt ccgcttcgca ACATGTgagc aaaaggccagcaaaaggcca ggaaccgtaa aaaggccgcg ttgctggcgt ttttccatag gctccgcccccctgacgagc atcacaaaaa tcgacgctca agtcagaggt ggcgaaaccc gacaggactataaagatacc aggcgtttcc ccctggaagc tccctcgtgc gctctcctgt tccgaccctgccgcttaccg gatacctgtc cgcctttctc ccttcgggaa gcgtggcgct ttctcatagctcacgctgta ggtatctcag ttcggtgtag gtcgttcgct ccaagctggg ctgtgtgcacgaaccccccg ttcagcccga ccgctgcgcc ttatccggta actatcgtct tgagtccaacccggtaagac acgacttatc gccactggca gcagccactg gtaacaggat tagcagagcgaggtatgtag gcggtgctac agagttcttg aagtggtggc ctaactacgg ctacactagaaggacagtat ttggtatctg cgctctgctg aagccagtta ccttcggaaa aagagttggtagctcttgat ccggcaaaca aaccaccgct ggtagcggtg gtttttttgt ttgcaagcagcagattacgc gcagaaaaaa aggatctcaa gaagatcctt tgatcttttc tacggggtctgacgctcagt ggaacgaaaa ctcacgttaa gggattttgg TCATGAgttg tgtctcaaaatctctgatgt tacattgcac aagataaaaa tatatcatca tgaacaataa aactgtctgcttacataaac agtaatacaa ggggtgttat gagccatatt caacgggaaa cgtcttgctcgaggccgcga ttaaattcca acatggatgc tgatttatat gggtataaat gggctcgcgataatgtcggg caatcaggtg cgacaatcta tcgattgtat gggaagcccg atgcgccagagttgtttctg aaacatggca aaggtagcgt tgccaatgat gttacagatg agatggtcagactaaactgg ctgacggaat ttatgcctct tccgaccatc aagcatttta tccgtactcctgatgatgca tggttactca ccactgcgat ccccgggaaa acagcattcc aggtattagaagaatatcct gattcaggtg aaaatattgt tgatgcgctg gcagtgttcc tgcgccggttgcattcgatt cctgtttgta attgtccttt taacagcgat cgcgtatttc gtctcgctcaggcgcaatca cgaatgaata acggtttggt tgatgcgagt gattttgatg acgagcgtaatggctggcct gttgaacaag tctggaaaga aatgcataag cttttgccat tctcaccggattcagtcgtc actcatggtg atttctcact tgataacctt atttttgacg aggggaaattaataggttgt attgatgttg gacgagtcgg aatcgcagac cgataccagg atcttgccatcctatggaac tgcctcggtg agttttctcc ttcattacag aaacggcttt ttcaaaaatatggtattgat aatcctgata tgaataaatt gcagtttcat ttgatgctcg atgagtttttctaatcagaa ttggttaatt ggttgtaaca ctggcagagc attacgctga cttgacgggacggcggcttt gttgaataaa tcgaactttt gctgagttga aggatcCTCG GGagttgtcagcctgtcccg cttataagat catacgccgt tatacGTTGT TTACGCTTTG AGGAATTAAC C SEQID:35 pKQ- ATGGTTCATT GGGCCGATTA TATTGctgat aaaataatta gagagagggg PhKepggagaaggag aagtacgttg ttgagagtgg aataacgcca agtggttacg ttcacgttgggaactttagg gagcttttta cagcttatat tgtgggccat gccctaaggg ataaggggtatgaggttagg cacatccaca tgtgggatga ttatgataga tttaggaagg ttccaaggaacgttccccag gaatggaaag attacctggg aatgcccatt agtgaagttc ctgatccctggggatgccat gagagttatg ctgaacactt catgagaaag ttcgaggagg aggtagaaaaattagggatc gaagttgact ttctttatgc gagtgaactc tacaagagag gggaatattctgaggagata aggttagcct ttgagaaaag ggataagata atggagatac taaacaagtatagggaaatt gcgaaacaac ctccccttcc agagaactgg tggcccgcaa tggtttactgccctgagcat aggagggaag cagagatcat tgaatgggat gggggctgga aggttaagtataagtgcccc gaaggtcacg agggatgggt tgatataagg agtgggaacg tgaaactgaggtggcgtgtt gattggccca tgcgttggtc tcactttggc gttgacttcg aacctgctggaaaggatcat cttgtggctg gttcaagcta cgatacggga aaggagatta taaaggaagtttatggaaag gaagctccgt tatctttaat gtatgagttt gttggaatta aggggcagaaggggaagatg agtggtagta agggaaatgt tattttactc agcgatctgt atgaggttcttgagccaggt ctcgttagat ttatctacgc tcggcatagg ccaaacaagg agataaagatagatctaggt cttggcattc taaacctcta cgatgagttc gataaagttg agagaatatacttcggggtt gagggtggta aaggtgatga tgaagaatta aggaggactt acgagctttcggtgatgctg ccaacttact gatttagtgt atgatggtgt ttttgaggtg ctccagtggcttctgtttct atcagctgtc cctcctgttc agctactgac ggggtggtgc gtaacggcaaaagcaccgcc ggacatcagc gctatctctg ctctcactgc cgtaaaacat ggcaactgcagttcacttac accgcttctc aacccggtac gcaccagaaa atcattgata tggccatgaatggcgttgga tgccgggcaa ccgcccgcat tatgggcgtt ggcctcaaca cgattttccgccatttaaaa aactcaggcc gcagtcggta acctcgcgca tacagccggg cagtgacgtcatcgtctgcg cggaaatgga cgaacagtgg ggatacgtcg gtgctaaatc gcgccagcgctggctgtttt acgcgtatga caggctccgg aagacggttg ttgcgcacgt attcggtgaacgcactatgg cgacgctggg gcgtcttatg agcctgctgt caccctttga cgtggtgatatggatgacgg atggctggcc gctgtatgaa tcccgcctga agggaaagct gcacgtaatcagcaagcgat atacgcagcg aattgagcgg cataacctga atctgaggca gcacctggcacggctgggac ggaagtcgct gtcgttctca aaatcggtgg agctgcatga caaagtcatcgggcattatc tgaacataaa acactatcaa taagttggag tcattacccc gagctttcaatgcctaagaa gcctgagaga ttagtcgctc aagctccttt taggttccta gcggtgttggttcagttacc gcatttaacc gaagaagaca taataaatgt tctaatcaaa cagggacatattcccaggga tctatccaag gaggacgttg agagggttaa acttaggata aaccttgctaggaattgggt taaaaagtat gcccctgagg atgttaaatt ctcaatactt gagaaacctccagaagttga ggtaagtgaa gatgttaggg aggccatgaa tgaggttgct gagtggcttgagaatcatga ggaatttagc gttgaagagt ttaataacat tctattcgaa gttgccaagaggagggggat atccagtagg gagtggtttt cgacgctcta cagattattt attggaaaggaaaggggacc gagattggcc agtttcctgg catctcttga taggagtttc gttattAAACGACTTAGACT TGAGGGATAA GAATTCGAAG CTTGGGCCCG AACAAAAACT CATCTCAGAAGAGGATCTGA ATAGCGCCGT CGACCATCAT CATCATCATC ATTGAGTTTA AACGGTCTCCAGCTTGGCTG TTTTGGCGGA TGAGAGAAGA TTTTCAGCCT GATACAGATT AAATCAGAACGCAGAAGCGG TCTGATAAAA CAGAATT~GC CTGGCGGCAG TAGCGCGGTG GTCCCACCTGACCCCATGCC GAACTCAGAA GTGAAACGCC GTAGCGCCGA TGGTAGTGTG GGGTCTCCCCATGCGAGAGT AGGGAACTGC CAGGCATCAA ATAAAACGAA AGGCTCAGTC GAAAGACTGGGCCTTTCGTT TTATCTGTTG TTTGTCGGTG AACGATATCT GCTTTTCTTC GCGAATtaattccgcttcgc aACATGTgag caaaaggcca gcaaaaggcc aggaaccgta aaaaggccgcgttgctggcg tttttccata ggctccgccc ccctgacgag catcacaaaa atcgacgctcaagtcagagg tggcgaaacc cgacaggact ataaagatac caggcgtttc cccctggaagctccctcgtg cgctctcctg ttccgaccct gccgcttacc ggatacctgt ccgcctttctcccttcggga agcgtggcgc tttctcatag ctcacgctgt aggtatctca gttcggtgtaggtcgttcgc tccaagctgg gctgtgtgca cgaacccccc gttcagcccg accgctgcgccttatccggt aactatcgtc ttgagtccaa cccggtaaga cacgacttat cgccactggcagcagccact ggtaacagga ttagcagagc gaggtatgta ggcggtgcta cagagttcttgaagtggtgg cctaactacg gctacactag aaggacagta tttggtatct gcgctctgctgaagccagtt accttcggaa aaagagttgg tagctcttga tccggcaaac aaaccaccgctggtagcggt ggtttttttg tttgcaagca gcagattacg cgcagaaaaa aaggatctcaagaagatcct ttgatctttt ctacggggtc tgacgctcag tggaacgaaa actcacgttaagggattttg gTCATGAgtt gtgtctcaaa atctctgatg ttacattgca caagataaaaatatatcatc atgaacaata aaactgtctg cttacataaa cagtaataca aggggtgttatgagccatat tcaacgggaa acgtcttgct cgaggccgcg attaaattcc aacatggatgctgatttata tgggtataaa tgggctcgcg ataatgtcgg gcaatcaggt gcgacaatctatcgattgta tgggaagccc gatgcgccag agttgtttct gaaacatggc aaaggtagcgttgccaatga tgttacagat gagatggtca gactaaactg gctgacggaa tttatgcctcttccgaccat caagcatttt atccgtactc ctgatgatgc atggttactc accactgcgatccccgggaa aacagcattc caggtattag aagaatatcc tgattcaggt gaaaatattgttgatgcgct ggcagtgttc ctgcgccggt tgcattcgat tcctgtttgt aattgtccttttaacagcga tcgcgtattt cgtctcgctc aggcgcaatc acgaatgaat aacggtttggttgatgcgag tgattttgat gacgagcgta atggctggcc tgttgaacaa gtctggaaagaaatgcataa gcttttgcca ttctcaccgg attcagtcgt cactcatggt gatttctcacttgataacct tatttttgac gaggggaaat taataggttg tattgatgtt ggacgagtcggaatcgcaga ccgataccag gatcttgcca tcctatggaa ctgcctcggt gagttttctccttcattaca gaaacggctt tttcaaaaat atggtattga taatcctgat atgaataaattgcagtttca tttgatgctc gatgagtttt tctaatcaga attggttaat tggttgtaacactggcagag cattacgctg acttgacggg acggcggctt tgttgaataa atcgaacttttgctgagttg aaggatcCTC GGGagttgtc agcctgtccc gcttataaga tcatacgccgttatacGTTG TTTACGCTTT GAGGAATTAA CC

1. A translation system comprising: an orthogonal lysyl tRNA (lysylO-tRNA) or modified variant thereof; an orthogonal aminoacyl tRNAsynthetase (O-RS) that preferentially charges an orthogonal lysyl tRNAor modified variant thereof with one or more amino acid; or anorthogonal lysyl tRNA (lysyl O-tRNA) or modified variant thereof and anorthogonal aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (O-RS) that preferentially chargesthe lysyl O-tRNA or modified variant thereof with one or more aminoacid.
 2. The translation system of claim 1, wherein the translationsystem comprises a cell.
 3. The translation system of claim 2, whereinthe cell is an E. coli cell.
 4. The translation system of claim 1,wherein the amino acid is an unnatural amino acid.
 5. (canceled)
 6. Thetranslation system of claim 1, wherein the lysyl O-tRNA or modifiedvariant thereof, the O-RS, or both, are derived from Pyrococcushorikoshii (PhKRS).
 7. The translation system of claim 6, wherein theO-RS is PhKRS, or E444G.
 8. The translation system of claim 6, whereinthe O-RS, when expressed in an E. coli cell displays a toxicity that isthe same as or less than an I41 and/or S268 mutant of PhΔAD.
 9. Thetranslation system of claim 1, wherein the lysyl O-tRNA or modifiedvariant thereof comprises a recognition sequence for a four base codonor an amber codon.
 10. The translation system of claim 1, wherein thelysyl O-tRNA or modified variant thereof comprises a recognitionsequence for AGGA.
 11. The translation system of claim 1, wherein thelysyl O-tRNA or modified variant thereof comprises an anti-codon loopcomprising a CU(X)_(n)XXXAA sequence.
 12. The translation system ofclaim 11, wherein the CU(X)_(n)XXXAA sequence comprises CUCUAAA orCUUCCUAA.
 13. The translation system of claim 1, wherein the lysylO-tRNA or modified variant thereof comprises SEQ ID NO:24.
 14. Thetranslation system of claim 1, wherein the O-RS and lysyl O-tRNA ormodified variant thereof are at least 50% as effective at suppressing astop or frame shift selector codon as E444G, in combination with anO-tRNA of SEQ ID NO:24.
 15. The translation system of claim 1,comprising an additional O-RS and an additional O-tRNA, wherein theadditional O-RS and the additional O-tRNA suppress a frame shiftselector codon that is different from a frame shift selector codonsuppressed by the lysyl O-tRNA or variant thereof and the O-RS thatpreferentially charges the lysyl O-tRNA or modified variant thereof. 16.The translation system of claim 1, wherein the translation systemsuppresses both a four base selector codon and a stop selector codon ina target nucleic acid that encodes a target polypeptide.
 17. Thetranslation system of claim 16, wherein the four base selector codoncomprises the sequence AGGA and the stop selector codon comprises thesequence TAG or UAG.
 18. The translation system of claim 1, comprising atarget nucleic acid that comprises a four base selector codon.
 19. Thetranslation system of claim 18, comprising a protein encoded by thetarget nucleic acid.
 20. (canceled)
 21. The translation system of claim1, comprising a target nucleic acid that comprises a four base selectorcodon and a stop selector codon.
 22. The translation system of claim 21,comprising a protein encoded by the target nucleic acid, wherein theprotein comprises at least two different unnatural amino acids.
 23. Atranslation system comprising: a first orthogonal tRNA (O-tRNA) thatrecognizes a four base selector codon; a first orthogonal aminoacyl tRNAsynthetase (O-RS) that preferentially charges the O-tRNA with a firstunnatural amino acid; a second O-tRNA that recongnizes a stop selectorcodon; and, a second O-RS that preferentially charges the second O-tRNAwith a second unnatural amino acid.
 24. The translation system of claim23, wherein the four base selector codon is AGGA.
 25. The translationsystem of claim 23, wherein the stop codon is UAG.
 26. The translationsystem of claim 23, wherein the translation system comprises a cell. 27.The translation system of claim 23, wherein the first or second O-tRNAis an orthogonal lysyl tRNA (lysyl O-tRNA) or modified variant thereof.28. The translation system of claim 23, wherein the first O-tRNA is anorthogonal lysyl tRNA (lysyl O-tRNA) or modified variant thereof and thesecond O-tRNA is an orthogonal tyrosyl tRNA (tyrosyl O-tRNA) or modifiedvariant thereof.
 29. The translation system of claim 23, furthercomprising a nucleic acid comprising at least a four base selector codonand a stop selector codon.
 30. The translation system of claim 29,wherein the four base selector codon is AGGA and the stop selector codonis TAG or UAG.
 31. The translation system of claim 29, wherein thenucleic acid is an expressed RNA.
 32. The translation system of claim29, wherein the translation system comprises a protein encoded by thenucleic acid, which protein comprises at least two different unnaturalamino acids.
 33. (canceled)
 34. (canceled)
 35. (canceled)
 36. Acomposition comprising: PhKRS, E444G, or a conservative variant thereof.37. A nucleic acid that encodes PhKRS, E444G, or a conservative variantthereof.
 38. A nucleic acid that comprises or encodes a tRNA thatcorresponds to SEQ ID NO:24, or a conservative variation thereof. 39.(canceled)
 40. (canceled)
 41. (canceled)
 42. (canceled)
 43. (canceled)44. (canceled)
 45. (canceled)
 46. (canceled)
 47. (canceled) 48.(canceled)
 49. (canceled)
 50. (canceled)
 51. (canceled)
 52. (canceled)53. (canceled)
 54. (canceled)
 55. (canceled)
 56. (canceled) 57.(canceled)
 58. (canceled)
 59. (canceled)
 60. (canceled)
 61. (canceled)62. (canceled)
 63. (canceled)
 64. (canceled)
 65. (canceled)